27.06.2013 Views

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

160<br />

THE FOURTH DIMENSION<br />

Each of the six surrounding cubes carried on in the same<br />

motion will make a tesseract also, and these will be<br />

grouped around the tesseract formed by A. But will they<br />

enclose it completely?<br />

All the cubes An, Af, etc., lie in our space. But there is<br />

nothing between the cube A and that solid sheet in contact<br />

with which every particle of matter is. When the cube A<br />

moves in the fourth direction it starts from its position,<br />

say Aκ, and ends in a final position Aα (using the words<br />

“ana” and “kata” for up and down in the fourth dimension).<br />

Now the movement in this fourth dimension is<br />

not bounded by any of the cubes An, Af, nor by what<br />

they form when thus moved. <strong>The</strong> tesseract which A<br />

becomes is bounded in the positive and negative ways in<br />

this new direction by the first position of A and the last<br />

position of A. Or, if we ask how many tesseracts lie<br />

around the tesseract which A forms, there are eight, of<br />

which one meets it by the cube A, and another meets it<br />

by a cube like A at the end of its motion.<br />

We come here to a very curious thing. <strong>The</strong> whole<br />

solid cube A is to be looked on merely as a boundary of<br />

the tesseract.<br />

Yet this is exactly analogous to what the plane being<br />

would come to in his study of the solid world. <strong>The</strong><br />

square A (fig. 96), which the plane being looks on as a<br />

solid existence in his plane world, is merely the boundary<br />

of the cube which he supposes generated by its motion.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact is that we have to recognise that, if there is<br />

another dimension of space, our present idea of a solid<br />

body, as one which has three dimensions only, does not<br />

correspond to anything real, but is the abstract idea of a<br />

three-dimensional boundary limiting a four-dimensional<br />

solid, which a four-dimensional being would form. <strong>The</strong><br />

plane being’s thought of a square is not the thought<br />

of what we should call a possibly existing real square,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!