You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
118<br />
THE FOURTH DIMENSION<br />
being, those that do survive will possess such and such<br />
characteristics. This is the necessary beginning for ascertaining<br />
what kinds of organisms do come into existence.<br />
And so Kant’s hypothesis of a random consciousness is<br />
the necessary beginning for the rational investigation<br />
of consciousness as it is. His assumption supplies, as<br />
it were, the space in which we can observe the phenomena.<br />
It gives the general laws constitutive of any<br />
experience. If, on the assumption of absolute randomness<br />
in the constituents, such and such would be<br />
characteristic of the experience, then, whatever the constituents,<br />
these characteristics must be universally valid.<br />
We will now proceed to examine more carefully the<br />
poiograph, constructed for the purpose of exhibiting an<br />
illustration of Kant’s theory of apperception.<br />
In order to show the derivation order out of non-order<br />
it has been necessary to assume a principle of duality—<br />
we have had the axes and the posits on the axes—there<br />
are two sets of elements, each non-ordered, and it is in<br />
the reciprocal relation of them that the order, the definite<br />
system, originates.<br />
Is there anything in our experience of the nature of a<br />
duality?<br />
<strong>The</strong>re certainly are objects in our experience which<br />
have order and those which are incapable of order. <strong>The</strong><br />
two roots of a quadratic equation have no order. No one<br />
can tell which comes first. If a body rises vertically and<br />
then goes at right angles to its former course, no one can<br />
assign any priority to the direction of the north or to the<br />
east. <strong>The</strong>re is no priority in directions of turning. We<br />
associate turnings with no order, progressions in a line<br />
with order. But in the axes and points we have assumed<br />
above there is no such distinction. It is the same, whether<br />
we assume an order among the turnings, and no order<br />
among the points on the axes, or, vice versa, an order in