27.06.2013 Views

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

Hinton - The Fourth Dimension.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118<br />

THE FOURTH DIMENSION<br />

being, those that do survive will possess such and such<br />

characteristics. This is the necessary beginning for ascertaining<br />

what kinds of organisms do come into existence.<br />

And so Kant’s hypothesis of a random consciousness is<br />

the necessary beginning for the rational investigation<br />

of consciousness as it is. His assumption supplies, as<br />

it were, the space in which we can observe the phenomena.<br />

It gives the general laws constitutive of any<br />

experience. If, on the assumption of absolute randomness<br />

in the constituents, such and such would be<br />

characteristic of the experience, then, whatever the constituents,<br />

these characteristics must be universally valid.<br />

We will now proceed to examine more carefully the<br />

poiograph, constructed for the purpose of exhibiting an<br />

illustration of Kant’s theory of apperception.<br />

In order to show the derivation order out of non-order<br />

it has been necessary to assume a principle of duality—<br />

we have had the axes and the posits on the axes—there<br />

are two sets of elements, each non-ordered, and it is in<br />

the reciprocal relation of them that the order, the definite<br />

system, originates.<br />

Is there anything in our experience of the nature of a<br />

duality?<br />

<strong>The</strong>re certainly are objects in our experience which<br />

have order and those which are incapable of order. <strong>The</strong><br />

two roots of a quadratic equation have no order. No one<br />

can tell which comes first. If a body rises vertically and<br />

then goes at right angles to its former course, no one can<br />

assign any priority to the direction of the north or to the<br />

east. <strong>The</strong>re is no priority in directions of turning. We<br />

associate turnings with no order, progressions in a line<br />

with order. But in the axes and points we have assumed<br />

above there is no such distinction. It is the same, whether<br />

we assume an order among the turnings, and no order<br />

among the points on the axes, or, vice versa, an order in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!