27.06.2013 Views

Total Syntheses of (±)-(Z)- and (±)-(E)-9

Total Syntheses of (±)-(Z)- and (±)-(E)-9

Total Syntheses of (±)-(Z)- and (±)-(E)-9

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

718 J.-L. Zhu et al. PAPER<br />

18<br />

a, b<br />

82% over 2 steps<br />

O<br />

(<strong>±</strong>)-3<br />

Scheme 5 Reagents <strong>and</strong> conditions: (a) TBAF (5.0 equiv), THF,<br />

r.t., 3 h; (b) PDC (2.0 equiv, based on 24), CH2Cl2, r.t., 2 h.<br />

In summary, we have accomplished the total synthesis <strong>of</strong><br />

1 <strong>and</strong> 2 in 13 steps through a novel synthetic approach. Although<br />

the ultimate synthesis did not strictly follow the<br />

initially designed scheme, our original goals <strong>of</strong> using the<br />

Diels–Alder reaction to construct the A-ring <strong>and</strong> the reductive<br />

alkylation <strong>of</strong> the Diels–Alder adduct to create the<br />

spiro quaternary center with the suitable functionalities<br />

for accessing the B-ring have been well realized. In the<br />

synthetic sequence, some intermediates were produced as<br />

the isomeric mixtures, but the separations <strong>of</strong> them were<br />

shown to be unnecessary since all <strong>of</strong> the isomers could be<br />

eventually converted into either <strong>of</strong> the targets. In comparison<br />

with the previously reported syntheses (overall<br />

yields: 0.31% 6 <strong>and</strong> 4.51% 7 for 1, 2.12% 6 <strong>and</strong> 0.45% 7 for<br />

2, respectively), the current study did not result in a significant<br />

improvement on the overall yields <strong>of</strong> 1 (0.85%) <strong>and</strong><br />

2 (1.74%), but the synthetic route developed by us appears<br />

to be more general <strong>and</strong> the generality has been demonstrated<br />

by the ready achievement <strong>of</strong> (<strong>±</strong>)-majusculone (3)<br />

from the intermediate leading to 1 <strong>and</strong> 2. The application<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same strategy for the syntheses <strong>of</strong> other members <strong>of</strong><br />

chamigrene family is the focus <strong>of</strong> our ongoing studies.<br />

Unless otherwise noted, all starting materials <strong>and</strong> reagents were<br />

purchased from commercial suppliers <strong>and</strong> used without further purification.<br />

THF was distilled from sodium-benzophenone; toluene,<br />

benzene, CH 2Cl 2, <strong>and</strong> DMF were distilled from CaH 2 before use.<br />

TLC analysis <strong>and</strong> preparative TLC were performed on Macherey-<br />

Nagel DC-Fertigplatten. Durasil-25 UV 254 glass-backed plates, <strong>and</strong><br />

visualized by UV, or KMnO 4 or I 2 treatment. All <strong>of</strong> the products<br />

were purified by flash chromatography on Merck Kieselgel 60 (Art.<br />

9385) (230–400 mesh) or neutral aluminum oxide. IR spectra were<br />

recorded on a Jasco FT/IR 410 spectrometer. NMR spectra ( 1 H, 13 C,<br />

DEPT, NOESY) were recorded on a Bruker Avance DPE-400 or a<br />

Bruker Avance DPE-600 spectrometer using CDCl 3 or C 6D 6 as solvent.<br />

High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) <strong>and</strong> low-resolution<br />

mass spectra (LRMS) were recorded on a Finnigan/Thermo Quest<br />

MAT 95XL spectrometer in a fast atom bombardment (FAB) model.<br />

Ethyl 2-Cyano-3-methylbut-2-enoate (4)<br />

This known compound was prepared by a modified procedure as<br />

follows. LiBr (7.82 g, 0.09 mol) <strong>and</strong> molecular sieves 3Å (300 mg)<br />

were added to a mixture <strong>of</strong> ethyl cyanoacetate (2.0 g, 0.018 mol)<br />

<strong>and</strong> acetone (60 mL). The suspension was refluxed for 18 h, cooled<br />

to r.t., filtered, <strong>and</strong> concentrated in vacuo. The residue was diluted<br />

with EtOAc (300 mL), washed with H 2O (2 × 50 mL) <strong>and</strong> brine (50<br />

mL), <strong>and</strong> concentrated. The crude mixture was subjected to chromatographic<br />

purification on silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 20:1) to<br />

yield 4 (1.82 g, 66%).<br />

Synthesis 2011, No. 5, 715–722 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York<br />

O<br />

4-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-cyano-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylic<br />

Acid Ethyl Ester (6) <strong>and</strong> 1-[(1R*,2S*,6S*)-<br />

4-(tert-Butyldimethylsilyloxy)-2,6-dimethylcyclohex-3enyl]ethanone<br />

(11)<br />

To a flame-dried 100 mL round-bottom flask were added anhyd<br />

ZnCl 2 (804 mg, 5.9 mmol) <strong>and</strong> anhyd toluene (20 mL). The resulting<br />

suspension was stirred under a N 2 atmosphere for 20 min before<br />

treating with a solution <strong>of</strong> 4 (904 mg, 5.9 mmol) in anhyd toluene<br />

(4 mL). After stirring for an additional 30 min, a solution <strong>of</strong> diene<br />

5 10 (5.85 g, 29.5 mmol) in anhyd toluene (8 mL) was added to the<br />

mixture. The mixture was then stirred at 80 °C for 20 h, cooled to<br />

r.t., <strong>and</strong> diluted with EtOAc (120 mL). The solution was successively<br />

washed with H 2O (2 × 30 mL) <strong>and</strong> brine (20 mL), dried<br />

(Na 2SO 4), filtered, <strong>and</strong> concentrated under reduced pressure. Chromatographic<br />

purification <strong>of</strong> the crude residue on silica gel (hexane–<br />

EtOAc, 100:1, 60:1, <strong>and</strong> 40:1) afforded 11 11 (500 mg, generated<br />

from 0.6 out <strong>of</strong> 5 equiv <strong>of</strong> 5) as a colorless sticky oil, followed by 6<br />

(1.7 g, 82%) as a mixture <strong>of</strong> two isomers (50:50).<br />

6<br />

IR (neat): 2960, 2931, 2857, 2242, 1739, 1671, 1463, 1363, 1259,<br />

1207, 838, 781 cm –1 .<br />

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d (isomer 1) = 4.57 (br s, 1 H), 4.35–<br />

4.16 (m, 2 H), 3.04–2.95 (m, 1 H), 2.42 (br d, J=17.5 Hz, 1 H),<br />

1.76 (d, J=17.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.33 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3 H), 1.18–1.05 (m,<br />

9 H), 0.90 (s, 9 H), 0.15 (s, 3 H), 0.14 (s, 3 H); d (isomer 2) = 4.51<br />

(br s, 1 H), 4.35–4.16 (m, 2 H), 2.90–2.82 (m, 1 H), 2.41 (d, J=17.3<br />

Hz, 1 H), 1.74 (d, J=17.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.30 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 3 H), 1.24<br />

(s, 3 H), 1.16–1.05 (m, 6 H), 0.90 (s, 9 H), 0.14 (s, 3 H), 0.13 (s, 3<br />

H).<br />

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d (isomer 1) = 167.7, 148.7, 117.6,<br />

105.6, 62.4, 58.9, 43.0, 37.6, 33.4, 27.1, 25.6, 22.0, 18.2, 17.9, 14.2,<br />

–4.3, –4.6; d (isomer 2) = 165.9, 149.3, 119.8, 103.7, 61.9, 57.2,<br />

40.5, 37.0, 35.9, 26.8, 26.0, 25.6, 17.9, 17.3, 14.2, –4.3, –4.5.<br />

HRMS-FAB: m/z calcd for C19H34NO3Si [M + H] + : 352.2308;<br />

found: 352.2298.<br />

11 11<br />

IR (neat): 2958, 2929, 1712, 1673, 1253, 1195, 1180, 838, 779 cm –1 .<br />

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d = 4.87 (dd, J=5.2, 1.8 Hz, 1 H),<br />

2.63 (dd, J=12.3, 6.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.51 (dd, J=10.9, 5.3 Hz, 1 H),<br />

2.19–2.10 (m, 1 H), 2.14 (s, 3 H), 2.07 (dd, J=17.0, 5.9 Hz, 1 H),<br />

1.75–1.68 (m, 1 H), 0.92 (d, J=4.7 Hz, 3 H), 0.91 (s, 9 H), 0.80 (d,<br />

J=7.0 Hz, 3 H), 0.13 (s, 3 H), 0.12 (s, 3 H).<br />

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d = 210.8, 149.2, 109.1, 57.4, 37.9,<br />

30.7, 30.6, 25.6, 24.8, 19.8, 18.0, 17.9, –4.3, –4.4.<br />

HRMS-FAB: m/z calcd for C16H31O2Si [M + H] + : 283.2093; found:<br />

283.2098.<br />

(1S*,2S*)-1-But-3-enyl-4-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylic<br />

Acid Ethyl Ester (12)<br />

To a solution <strong>of</strong> 6 (548 mg, 1.56 mmol) in anhyd THF (10 mL) precooled<br />

at –45 °C was added a THF solution <strong>of</strong> lithium naphthalenide<br />

(0.34 M, 16.1 mL, 5.46 mmol) 13 via syringe under the protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> a N2 atmosphere. The resulting dark green solution was stirred at<br />

–45 °C for 30 min <strong>and</strong> successively treated with 4-bromobut-1-ene<br />

(0.63 mL, 6.24 mmol) <strong>and</strong> HMPA (1.09 mL, 6.24 mmol). The reaction<br />

mixture was stirred at r.t. for 12 h, then poured into sat. aq<br />

NH4Cl (10 mL), <strong>and</strong> extracted with EtOAc (2 × 60 mL). The combined<br />

organic extracts were washed with H2O (2 × 15 mL) <strong>and</strong> brine<br />

(15 mL), <strong>and</strong> concentrated. Chromatographic purification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

crude mixture on silica gel (hexane–EtOAc, 100:1) afforded 12 as a<br />

colorless oil (416 mg, 70%).<br />

IR (neat): 2958, 2929, 2902, 2857, 1735, 1673, 1641, 1149, 1130,<br />

989, 939 cm –1 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!