252 C. Ryd<strong>in</strong> et al.: <strong>Cretaceous</strong> <strong>ephedroids</strong> <strong>from</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a
C. Ryd<strong>in</strong> et al.: <strong>Cretaceous</strong> <strong>ephedroids</strong> <strong>from</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a 253 Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> nomenclatural problems with <strong>the</strong> taxon Ephedrites and <strong>the</strong> difficulty to unambiguously correlate <strong>the</strong> present material with extant Ephedra, we prefer to keep <strong>the</strong> name Liaoxia, and suggest that Liaoxia is used for Ephedra-like megafossils that cannot be unambiguously assigned to <strong>the</strong> extant genus. Interpretation of <strong>the</strong> new fossils and comparison with extant species. The material presented here comprises impression-compression fossils with rema<strong>in</strong>s of oxidized organic material. Most specimens have stems, leaves, and cones <strong>in</strong> connection, but none of <strong>the</strong> fossils is preserved as whole plants and none has roots attached. No anatomical details are preserved. Characters are summarised <strong>in</strong> Table 2. The reconstruction of Liaoxia chenii (Fig. 21) is based on <strong>the</strong> holotype (PB17800) and <strong>the</strong> new specimens (PB20717–PB20718). Vegetative characters of Liaoxia. The fossils have erect stems, which are longitud<strong>in</strong>ally striate probably <strong>from</strong> preserved fibers. Upper parts are th<strong>in</strong>ner than <strong>the</strong> basal parts and <strong>in</strong> all species <strong>the</strong> stems become wider at <strong>the</strong> nodes. Liaoxia robusta is larger than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species and has <strong>the</strong> widest stems, but <strong>the</strong> variation is generally larger with<strong>in</strong> each plant than between <strong>the</strong>m. Leaves are absent <strong>in</strong> Liaoxia changii and L. elongata; leaf scars are miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> all specimens. In Liaoxia longibractea, only <strong>the</strong> uppermost part of a reproductive shoot is preserved and it is unknown whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it had leaves. The o<strong>the</strong>r species all have narrow, l<strong>in</strong>ear leaves, opposite at nodes. The leaf bases are probably sheeted <strong>in</strong> all <strong>the</strong> species, but <strong>the</strong> poor preservation prevents unambiguous conclusions. The venation is also generally poorly preserved, but obvious <strong>in</strong> at least some parts of <strong>the</strong> leaves. In all species <strong>the</strong>re is a primary parallel venation and no second order venation. Liaoxia chenii and L. acutiformis appear to have two parallel ve<strong>in</strong>s. Liaoxia robusta has four ve<strong>in</strong>s. In extant Ephedra, <strong>the</strong> size and shape of leaves and stems may vary significantly with<strong>in</strong> and between species (Gifford and Foster 1989) and <strong>the</strong> variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossils is covered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extant genus. For example, Ephedra leaves are generally m<strong>in</strong>ute (less than 10 mm long), ovate to triangular <strong>in</strong> shape, but Ephedra foliata has l<strong>in</strong>ear leaves with a well-developed lam<strong>in</strong>a, often 10–15 mm long, sometimes extend<strong>in</strong>g up to 40 mm <strong>in</strong> length (Freitag and Maier-Stolte 1994). Leaves of Ephedra have 2–3 parallel ve<strong>in</strong>s (Kubitzki 1990). Second order venation is unknown <strong>in</strong> Ephedra, but occurs <strong>in</strong> Gnetum and Welwitschia. Cones and cone bracts of Liaoxia. The cones of Liaoxia chenii and L. robusta are obovate and wide, whereas <strong>the</strong> cones of L. acutiformis and L. changii are elongate to slightly obovate. Cones of L. elongata are narrowly elongate, but one of <strong>the</strong> cones of L. elongata has a dist<strong>in</strong>ctly different shape and is smaller and rounded. It was probably preserved <strong>in</strong> an immature stage. In L. longibractea, <strong>the</strong> cones are rounded to obovate and several cones are densely crowded at nodes, form<strong>in</strong>g a head-like structure. Multiple axillary branch<strong>in</strong>g result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> four or more cones at a node is obvious <strong>in</strong> Liaoxia robusta, L. longibractea and L. elongata, and this feature is also common <strong>in</strong> extant Ephedra. Presence of multiple axillary buds is a synapomorphy for <strong>the</strong> Gnetales (Crane 1996, Doyle 1996). Liaoxia chenii has 2–6 pairs of ovate to triangular cone bracts with a po<strong>in</strong>ted apex. b Figs. 16–20. Liaoxia robusta Ryd<strong>in</strong>, S.Q. Wu et Friis sp. nov. and Liaoxia longibractea Ryd<strong>in</strong> S.Q. Wu et Friis sp. nov. 16–18 Liaoxia robusta sp. nov (PB20719–PB20720); a large species with preserved seeds, also <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> axil of proximal cone bracts. Leaves and stems are surrounded by precipitations that make <strong>the</strong>m appear wider than <strong>the</strong>y are. 19–20 Liaoxia longibractea sp. nov. (PB20725–PB20726); <strong>the</strong> uppermostpartofareproductiveshoot. It is unknown if this species had leaves or not. Note <strong>the</strong> spectacular cone bracts, and <strong>the</strong> densely crowded cones that form head-like structures. Scale bars = 1 cm <strong>in</strong> Figs. 16–20. S =seed;L =leaf