Information and liaison bulletin - Institut kurde de Paris
Information and liaison bulletin - Institut kurde de Paris
Information and liaison bulletin - Institut kurde de Paris
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• 10 • <strong>Information</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>liaison</strong> <strong>bulletin</strong> n° 272 • November 2007<br />
READ IN THE TURKISH PRESS :<br />
THE KURDISH QUESTION SEEN<br />
BY THE TURKISH GENERALS<br />
“The Turkish Republic has been fighting<br />
for several years against the most<br />
important problem in its history (…)<br />
Military intervention into Northern<br />
Iraq (Iraqi Kurdistan) is again on the<br />
agenda (…) The government has<br />
obtained parliaments authorisation for<br />
cross-bor<strong>de</strong>r intervention. Operations<br />
<strong>and</strong> fighting persist on the bor<strong>de</strong>r.<br />
How have the Turkish Armed Forces<br />
conducted this struggle? How has this<br />
Army, which is after all a regular one,<br />
emerged victorious from this struggle<br />
called “the asymmetrical war”? What<br />
have been the repercussions of this<br />
struggle on the State, on the Turkish<br />
armed forces <strong>and</strong> on the PKK? What<br />
have been the mistakes ma<strong>de</strong> by<br />
Turkey during this period of struggle?<br />
Does the State, does the Army, have<br />
the same line <strong>and</strong> orientation today as<br />
at the start of the struggle in 1984?<br />
What are the views of the comm<strong>and</strong>ers<br />
who conducted this struggle against<br />
the PKK <strong>and</strong> led the Turkish Armed<br />
forces? What are their views of the<br />
future?” To try <strong>and</strong> answer these<br />
questions, Fikret Bila, a Turkish<br />
journalist on the daily paper Milliyet,<br />
close to Army circles, carried<br />
out a series of interviews with five<br />
Turkish generals during the month<br />
of November. The following are<br />
extensive extracts from these interviews,<br />
published in the Turkish<br />
daily as from 3 November:<br />
It was 16 September 1998. Atilla Ates,<br />
comm<strong>and</strong>er in Chief of the Army had<br />
just ma<strong>de</strong> his famous speech of warning<br />
to Damascus, in Reyhanli district<br />
of Hatay. Damascus would have to<br />
h<strong>and</strong> Ocalan over to us of face the risk<br />
of war with Turkey. General Aytac<br />
Yalman, Comm<strong>and</strong>er of the Army’s<br />
2nd Division, who was accompanying<br />
Ates Pasha that day, set to work as<br />
soon as his chief had left for Ankara …<br />
What would have happened if Damascus<br />
had not taken Turkey’s threats<br />
into account? (…) We would have<br />
entered Syria. The plans were<br />
ready for going right through to<br />
Damascus. We were not joking.<br />
Had Syria not taken any measures on<br />
its bor<strong>de</strong>rs?<br />
It was not in any position to stop<br />
us. The majority of its troops were<br />
stationed on the bor<strong>de</strong>r with Israel<br />
… Following the collapse of the<br />
USSR Russia could not come to its<br />
aid. Syria was short of spare parts:<br />
its planes could not take off, its<br />
tanks were pinned down. And we<br />
were <strong>de</strong>termined. I myself knew<br />
the region very well. … (…)<br />
It was then that the news came via the<br />
Egyptian Presi<strong>de</strong>nt, Hosni Mubarak<br />
(…). Mubarak phoned the Turkish<br />
Presi<strong>de</strong>nt, Demirel, <strong>and</strong> informed him<br />
that Hafiz al-Assad had <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d to<br />
send Abdullah Ocalan away from<br />
Syria. After he left Syria, Ocalan was<br />
finally <strong>de</strong>livered to Turkish officials in<br />
Nairobi on 15 February 1999. The following<br />
year, Aytac Pasha became<br />
Comm<strong>and</strong>er of the Gendarmerie <strong>and</strong><br />
in 2002 Comm<strong>and</strong>er in Chief of the<br />
Army. He retired in 2004, leaving his<br />
comm<strong>and</strong> to General Yasar Buyukanit<br />
(today the Chief of Staff of the Turkish<br />
Armed Forces).<br />
The h<strong>and</strong>ing over of Ocalan to the<br />
Turkish authorities is viewed somewhat<br />
differently by Aytac Yalman: “In<br />
my opinion, the USA had already long<br />
<strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d to intervene in Iraq. That is<br />
why the Americans h<strong>and</strong>ed Ocalan<br />
over to us. They wanted to be able to<br />
rely on the Kurds when they intervened<br />
in Iraq. They had planned to<br />
carry out this intervention with the<br />
help of Barzani <strong>and</strong> Talabani. Ocalan<br />
was an alternative to Barzani <strong>and</strong> Talabani.<br />
I think the Americans <strong>de</strong>livered<br />
Ocalan to strengthen Barzani <strong>and</strong> Talabani’s<br />
margin of manoeuvre. (…)<br />
Questioned on the non-military<br />
aspects of the Kurdish question, General<br />
Yalman stressed: “The social<br />
dimension of the problem is very old.<br />
In reality Turkey aught to have seen<br />
the problem <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>de</strong> a just interpretation<br />
of it when it was still just a<br />
social question. A solution could then<br />
have been found at that time if what<br />
was nee<strong>de</strong>d had been done. (…) What<br />
are the social aspects of the (Kurdish)<br />
problem?<br />
It can be <strong>de</strong>scribed as a question of<br />
“self expression”. They want to speak<br />
their own language, sing <strong>and</strong> listen to<br />
their songs. At that time we were