Impulses for Growth and Employment through Profitable Savings in ...

Impulses for Growth and Employment through Profitable Savings in ... Impulses for Growth and Employment through Profitable Savings in ...

aachenerstiftung
from aachenerstiftung More from this publisher
25.06.2013 Views

Table 1 shows that the effects on GDP are only slightly different to those in Scenario I. However, this scenario has a much better labour market effect of about 760,000 additional jobs because the negative effect on employment due to wage increases is inapplicable. Further results of Scenario II in 2015 in comparison to the base-line scenario are: • Economy: Real production value grows by 2.4% or EUR 110.0 billion, net company profits grow nominally by EUR 163.6 billion. • Employees: The wage bill grows nominally by merely EUR 22.3 billion. However, prices fall more than in Scenario I with the effect of a real improvement of the position of employees: With practically unchanged nominal wages real wages increase through a 3% decline in consumer prices while employment increases by about 756,000 persons. • Public sector budgets: Relief at a nominal EUR 21.2 billion is now considerably higher than in Scenario I because social costs are now much lower due to the employment situation. Of course, employment effects do not take place to the same degree across all sectors, as figure 2 shows. Definite winners can be found in all service sectors. Besides trade and services close to companies, the health sector, education, culture, sports and entertainment as well home services benefit particularly. These sectors profit from an increased demand emanat- ing from higher incomes induced by dematerialization. Results of Scenario III In Scenario III productivity growth minus the counteracting wage development is passed on fully to consumers in form of price reductions. With respect to wage formulation we assume the same behaviour as in Scenario I. This means that the wage rate is endogenous. The benefit for business, employees and the government is initially in a clear improvement of purchasing power vis-à-vis Scenario I and II because of a price reduction of 7.2%. The expansive effect on GDP is the strongest of all scenarios. In comparison to the base-line scenario the following effects are anticipated for 2015: • Economy: Production value increases in real terms by 6.4% or EUR 195.5 billion, net company profit increases nominally by EUR 115.0 billion. • Employee wages: The wage bill increases by a nominal EUR 38.6 billion, purchasing power per working hour increases by 11.2% concomitant with a 7.2% decrease in consumer goods prices and a 4.0% increase in nominal wage rates. However, employment drops by about 300,000 persons due to the strong growth in real wages. Employment losses are much lower than in Scenario I because of the stronger general economic upturn. • Public sector budgets: In comparison to Scenario II the state budget is burdened by higher social costs so that the effect on the financial balance of the state at EUR -5.7% billion is slightly negative. This means that stronger price competition in the national market also increases the benefits of a profitable dematerialization and other productivity gains for businesses, the state and employees as well as providing a limited number of new jobs. 9

Summary of Results Computations with the econometric INFORGE model have shown that a profitable increase of material efficiency on a single-company basis leads to overall productivity increases and price reductions in the national economy which foster economic growth and have positive effects on real income for businesses and private households. Due to imperfect goods’ markets these price reductions are lower than the productivity gains. If wage rates increase in accordance with this productivity growth a decline in employment would occur despite the real increase in GDP. But if wage rates follow the paths they would have taken without dematerialization then we would witness clear employment growth. Closely linked thereto are the effects on the state budget. Depending on how the wage rate reacts there are negative or positive effects upon the financial balance of the social security system that clearly outweigh the direct effects of profitable dematerialization on public sector spending. The effects of the profitable increase of material efficiency modelled here on the labour market and the financial balance of the state therefore depend on the concrete design of dematerialization and flanking labour-market measures. 10

Table 1 shows that the effects on GDP are<br />

only slightly different to those <strong>in</strong> Scenario<br />

I. However, this scenario has a much better<br />

labour market effect of about 760,000<br />

additional jobs because the negative effect<br />

on employment due to wage <strong>in</strong>creases is<br />

<strong>in</strong>applicable.<br />

Further results of Scenario II <strong>in</strong> 2015 <strong>in</strong><br />

comparison to the base-l<strong>in</strong>e scenario are:<br />

• Economy: Real production value grows<br />

by 2.4% or EUR 110.0 billion, net<br />

company profits grow nom<strong>in</strong>ally by<br />

EUR 163.6 billion.<br />

• Employees: The wage bill grows nom<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

by merely EUR 22.3 billion. However,<br />

prices fall more than <strong>in</strong> Scenario I<br />

with the effect of a real improvement of<br />

the position of employees:<br />

With practically unchanged nom<strong>in</strong>al<br />

wages real wages <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>through</strong> a<br />

3% decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> consumer prices while<br />

employment <strong>in</strong>creases by about<br />

756,000 persons.<br />

• Public sector budgets: Relief at a<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>al EUR 21.2 billion is now considerably<br />

higher than <strong>in</strong> Scenario I because<br />

social costs are now much lower<br />

due to the employment situation.<br />

Of course, employment effects do not take<br />

place to the same degree across all sectors,<br />

as figure 2 shows. Def<strong>in</strong>ite w<strong>in</strong>ners<br />

can be found <strong>in</strong> all service sectors. Besides<br />

trade <strong>and</strong> services close to companies,<br />

the health sector, education, culture,<br />

sports <strong>and</strong> enterta<strong>in</strong>ment as well home<br />

services benefit particularly. These sectors<br />

profit from an <strong>in</strong>creased dem<strong>and</strong> emanat-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g from higher <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>in</strong>duced by dematerialization.<br />

Results of Scenario III<br />

In Scenario III productivity growth m<strong>in</strong>us<br />

the counteract<strong>in</strong>g wage development is<br />

passed on fully to consumers <strong>in</strong> <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

price reductions. With respect to wage<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulation we assume the same behaviour<br />

as <strong>in</strong> Scenario I. This means that the<br />

wage rate is endogenous.<br />

The benefit <strong>for</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess, employees <strong>and</strong><br />

the government is <strong>in</strong>itially <strong>in</strong> a clear improvement<br />

of purchas<strong>in</strong>g power vis-à-vis<br />

Scenario I <strong>and</strong> II because of a price reduction<br />

of 7.2%. The expansive effect on GDP<br />

is the strongest of all scenarios. In comparison<br />

to the base-l<strong>in</strong>e scenario the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

effects are anticipated <strong>for</strong> 2015:<br />

• Economy: Production value <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

<strong>in</strong> real terms by 6.4% or EUR 195.5 billion,<br />

net company profit <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

nom<strong>in</strong>ally by EUR 115.0 billion.<br />

• Employee wages: The wage bill <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

by a nom<strong>in</strong>al EUR 38.6 billion,<br />

purchas<strong>in</strong>g power per work<strong>in</strong>g hour <strong>in</strong>creases<br />

by 11.2% concomitant with a<br />

7.2% decrease <strong>in</strong> consumer goods<br />

prices <strong>and</strong> a 4.0% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>al<br />

wage rates. However, employment<br />

drops by about 300,000 persons due<br />

to the strong growth <strong>in</strong> real wages.<br />

<strong>Employment</strong> losses are much lower<br />

than <strong>in</strong> Scenario I because of the<br />

stronger general economic upturn.<br />

• Public sector budgets: In comparison<br />

to Scenario II the state budget is burdened<br />

by higher social costs so that<br />

the effect on the f<strong>in</strong>ancial balance of<br />

the state at EUR -5.7% billion is<br />

slightly negative.<br />

This means that stronger price competition<br />

<strong>in</strong> the national market also <strong>in</strong>creases the<br />

benefits of a profitable dematerialization<br />

<strong>and</strong> other productivity ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>for</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses,<br />

the state <strong>and</strong> employees as well<br />

as provid<strong>in</strong>g a limited number of new jobs.<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!