24.06.2013 Views

New Europe College Regional Program Yearbook 2001-2002

New Europe College Regional Program Yearbook 2001-2002

New Europe College Regional Program Yearbook 2001-2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

N.E.C. <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2001</strong>-<strong>2002</strong><br />

uses innovation as one of the features of industrial upgrading, whereas<br />

Kaplinsky and Readman (<strong>2001</strong>) try to distinguish industrial upgrading<br />

from innovation. According to them, innovation is the development of<br />

new products/processes or improvement of existing products by the firms<br />

compared to their previous position, whereas upgrading is how fast the<br />

firm reacts to its changing environment in comparison to its rivals. This<br />

definition brings in dynamics analysis to the industrial upgrading concept,<br />

which I try to grasp through dynamic capabilities (internal to the firm)<br />

and networks (external to the firm).<br />

Kaplinsky and Readman (<strong>2001</strong>) have worked on industrial upgrading<br />

at the firm level (at small and medium-sized enterprise [SME] level) and<br />

associated it with the value chain concept. 3 They distinguish four types<br />

of upgrading:<br />

• Process upgrading: increasing the efficiency of internal processes<br />

such that these are significantly better than those of the rivals,<br />

both within individual links in the chain (for example, increased<br />

inventory turns, lower scrap), and between the links in the chain<br />

(for example, more frequent, smaller and on-time deliveries from<br />

suppliers).<br />

• Product upgrading: introducing new products or improving old<br />

products faster than rivals to reap a market advantage. This involves<br />

changing new product development processes both within<br />

individual links in the value chain and in the relationship between<br />

different chain links.<br />

• Functional upgrading: increasing value added by changing the<br />

mix of activities conducted within the firm (for example, taking<br />

responsibility for, or outsourcing accounting, logistics and quality<br />

functions) or moving the locus of activities to different links in the<br />

value chain (for example, from manufacturing to design).<br />

• Chain upgrading: moving to a new value chain (for example,<br />

Taiwanese firms moved from the manufacture of transistor radios<br />

to calculators, to TVs, to computer monitors, to laptops and now to<br />

WAP phones).<br />

They have suggested that ‘standards’ 4 have become crucial parameters<br />

determining the upgrading of process or product or both, due to their role<br />

as qualifying requirements for participation in global product markets<br />

and value chains. For this reason, upgrading follows a logical path, starting<br />

with process upgrading to decrease costs and improve quality. On this<br />

306

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!