CITIES AND TOWN The medieval city.pdf
CITIES AND TOWN The medieval city.pdf
CITIES AND TOWN The medieval city.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
14<br />
THE MEDIEVAL CITY<br />
to other lords who supposed that if they also granted charters and laid<br />
out the streets of a new town they too would reap a steady income just<br />
as the lord of Totnes was doing. First came the borough of Bridgetown,<br />
at the distant end of the bridge across the river Dart. It achieved a very<br />
modest success at first, but then decayed and is today represented only<br />
by a small cluster of houses. Another attempt at town foundation was located<br />
a mile or so to the north. It was entirely unsuccessful, and no town<br />
ever materialized. <strong>The</strong> amount of business available in this part of Devon<br />
was not adequate for two incorporated boroughs, let alone for three.<br />
In England, where government was more centralized and more effective<br />
than in almost any other part of Europe, it became the practice for<br />
the king to authorize the establishment of a town or market and fair. Before<br />
he did so, however, the king usually instituted an inquiry known as<br />
ad quod damnum. It asked the simple question: what harm might the proposed<br />
market do to the trade and profitability of markets already in existence?<br />
Only if there would be none was the proposed market, in theory<br />
at least, allowed to proceed. In continental Europe the same practice<br />
broadly prevailed. Market and fairs were established and given protection<br />
by territorial lords who profited from their activities. It became the<br />
general rule that no town could be founded closer to another existing<br />
town than a day’s market journey (see p. 71).<br />
Those who granted charters of foundation to <strong>medieval</strong> towns can have<br />
had little knowledge of the theoretical basis of their distribution. Only<br />
by a prolonged process of trial and error did they learn that some towns<br />
would fail if they were too closely spaced or if located in unproductive<br />
areas incapable of generating any significant trade. Yet hope springs eternal,<br />
and the tally of unsuccessful and failed towns runs to hundreds. Nor<br />
did they understand the institutions and infrastructure that made for a<br />
successful town. In this they looked to those that had—fortuitously perhaps—achieved<br />
a measure of success and imitated their practices or<br />
“laws.” Many towns in England adopted the “Laws” of Breteuil, a small<br />
town in upper Normandy, which seemed to the Norman invaders of England<br />
to have achieved a certain degree of success. (See “Biographies and<br />
Places,” pp. 174–75.)<br />
<strong>The</strong> biggest wave of town foundations during the Middle Ages was in<br />
central and eastern Europe. Here it was part of the eastward progression<br />
of German-speaking peoples from the Elbe Valley to that of the Oder,