spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

personnel with all kinds of specializations, the pharmaceutical industry, medical insurances, and international organizations like Medicins sans Frontiers. The biomedical model reflects a scientific approach to health, based on reductionist logic combined with a preference for scientific neutrality pertaining to health. This means that all kinds of subjectivities and contingencies are left out in the acquisition of medical knowledge and in the treatment of a patient. Not surprisingly, one of the features of the biomedical model is the focus on disease. The idea that the incidence of disease implies the absence of health, sharpened biomedicine’s focus on the abnormal condition of health, with the result that representatives of the biomedical model are more concerned with the aberrations of health (that is, disease) than with manifestations of health. Expressions like ‘conquering the disease’ andthe battle against AIDS’ are typical for the biomedical model since it reveals modern thinking about development, human progress and control. The social constructivism model Towards the end of the 1970’s a new perspective on how to define health emerged, for the reductionist model of health and its focus on disease and the body did not do justice to other dimensions of health. Factors like political, social, economic and personal circumstances were generally not taken into consideration in the efforts to halt the disease. Things started to change radically under the influence of the work of Michel Foucault, and the social constructivist approach entered the health disciplines. This approach cast new light on the perception of health by addressing the very processes of distributing health knowledge. The implication of the social constructivist model is that the perception of health (and illness) is continuously being constructed in the words, thoughts and experiences of people. Thus, health is not something objective that is understood by everyone in the same way, and illness is not something that is being treated the same way everywhere in the world; health is constructed by the individual as well as by the group, who affirm and sustain that specific construct. In the social constructivist model it is not possible to understand ‘health’ by one definition or broad description, because health is seen as a complex collection of perceptions that are produced within specific discourses. According to the social constructivist approach, for example, the biomedical model is just one culturally determined discourse among many other health discourses. The exact definition of health, is not fixed in a particular objective idea, but comes into existence when the role of culture, power relations and dominant knowledge are considered as, and linked with, the ideas and practices of those who seek health. 26

1.2 MEANING OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM IN HEALTH RESEARCH The social constructivist model provides the theoretical framework for this research on health, illness and healing in the African context, because it clarifies the theories about health in such a way that these constructs can be used for further interdisciplinary research on health. Social constructivism 5 is an important framework provider for reflection on health in the African context in at least three ways: first of all, social constructivism draws the attention to social structures; in doing so, a focus on health-oriented approaches is generated, and this is a crucial addition to the existing frame of ‘fighting disease’; finally, the social constructivist model offers new opportunities for Reformed theology to reflect on health, illness and healing. 1.2.1 Social structures The significance of the social constructivist approach has to do, among other things, with its focus on social structures that co-determine the perception of health. Health conceptualizations are the result of how people view reality based on who they are, where they live, what they have experienced and what kind of information they can access. Health as construct implies that the personal perspective moulds the reality of health or disease. For example, someone belonging to the working or low-income classes may define pain in a different way to someone belonging to a high-income class of the same society, due to the fact that the higher-income class may experience fewer obstacles in accessing knowledge of diseases, treatment and medication. Various factors like class, gender, religion, sexuality, ethnic background, education, type of work and hobbies are important reference points in the social structures that determine the way people define health, recognize disease, or seek treatment of the health condition. This means that health is more than the visible condition of the individual, because health is directly related to the social structures of which the individual is fully part. The consideration of culture, identity, power relations, gender and class as essential constituents of health constructions does not only address the dimension of social structures (and hence of the presence of power and knowledge as parameters of human organizations), but it also implies that the social constructs reflect tendencies or changes within the social organization. The social constructivism approach thus offers a helpful frame for exploring and discerning transformation 5. Social constructivism should not be confused with social constructionism. Both concepts have to do with the development of social phenomena, yet the difference is in the emphasis. Social constructionism is about the construction of phenomena that are related to social contexts, while social constructivism puts the emphasis on how individuals construct meaning on the basis of available knowledge. Lev Vygotsky, a cognitive psychologist and a social constructivist theorist, stresses the critical importance of one’s social context for cognitive development and meaning-making. 27

1.2 MEANING OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM IN HEALTH RESEARCH<br />

The social constructivist model provides <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical framework for this research on health,<br />

illness <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> African context, because it clarifies <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ories about health <strong>in</strong> such a<br />

way that <strong>the</strong>se constructs can be used for fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary research on health. Social<br />

constructivism 5 is an important framework provider for reflection on health <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> African<br />

context <strong>in</strong> at least three ways: first <strong>of</strong> all, social constructivism draws <strong>the</strong> attention to social<br />

structures; <strong>in</strong> do<strong>in</strong>g so, a focus on health-oriented approaches is generated, <strong>and</strong> this is a crucial<br />

addition to <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g frame <strong>of</strong> ‘fight<strong>in</strong>g disease’; f<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> social constructivist model <strong>of</strong>fers<br />

new opportunities for Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology to reflect on health, illness <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />

1.2.1 Social structures<br />

The significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> social constructivist approach has to do, among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, with its<br />

focus on social structures that co-determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> health. Health conceptualizations<br />

are <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> how people view reality based on who <strong>the</strong>y are, where <strong>the</strong>y live, what <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

experienced <strong>and</strong> what k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>the</strong>y can access. Health as construct implies that <strong>the</strong><br />

personal perspective moulds <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> health or disease. For example, someone belong<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g or low-<strong>in</strong>come classes may def<strong>in</strong>e pa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a different way to someone belong<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />

high-<strong>in</strong>come class <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same society, due to <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> higher-<strong>in</strong>come class may<br />

experience fewer obstacles <strong>in</strong> access<strong>in</strong>g knowledge <strong>of</strong> diseases, treatment <strong>and</strong> medication.<br />

Various factors like class, gender, religion, sexuality, ethnic background, education, type <strong>of</strong> work<br />

<strong>and</strong> hobbies are important reference po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> social structures that determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> way people<br />

def<strong>in</strong>e health, recognize disease, or seek treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> health condition. This means that health<br />

is more than <strong>the</strong> visible condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual, because health is directly related to <strong>the</strong> social<br />

structures <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual is fully part.<br />

The consideration <strong>of</strong> culture, identity, power relations, gender <strong>and</strong> class as essential constituents<br />

<strong>of</strong> health constructions does not only address <strong>the</strong> dimension <strong>of</strong> social structures (<strong>and</strong> hence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> power <strong>and</strong> knowledge as parameters <strong>of</strong> human organizations), but it also implies that<br />

<strong>the</strong> social constructs reflect tendencies or changes with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> social organization. The social<br />

constructivism approach thus <strong>of</strong>fers a helpful frame for explor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> discern<strong>in</strong>g transformation<br />

5. Social constructivism should not be confused with social constructionism. Both concepts have to do with <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> social phenomena, yet <strong>the</strong> difference is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> emphasis. Social constructionism is about <strong>the</strong><br />

construction <strong>of</strong> phenomena that are related to social contexts, while social constructivism puts <strong>the</strong> emphasis on how<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals construct mean<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> available knowledge. Lev Vygotsky, a cognitive psychologist <strong>and</strong> a<br />

social constructivist <strong>the</strong>orist, stresses <strong>the</strong> critical importance <strong>of</strong> one’s social context for cognitive development <strong>and</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!