spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
the cross points to victory: God’s power is in his weakness, his death brings glorified life 64 . The cross stands for death, but also includes resurrection meaning. John’s theology of the cross clearly understands the cross as triumph over the power of death, as an “instrument and point of victory, not the point of defeat which has to be reversed on Easter morning” (Marsh 1968:618; see also Bultmann 1955:56; Newbigin 1982:160; Schillebeeckx 1980:409ff). The cross and resurrection are kept very close together, but not in such a way that the meaning of the cross is lost in the event of the resurrection. God’s power is established through his suffering and death 65 . The tension of the cross and resurrection is held together by the Spirit of God. The Spirit is the Spirit of Christ, the crucified One through whom it is possible to refer to the cross as the beginning of new life. Moltmann (1992:60-65) identifies the Holy Spirit as the One who accompanies Jesus in his life and death (see also Dabney 2001:56). Jesus receives his power to proclaim the coming Kingdom in word and deed from the Spirit without limits (Luke 4:18-19, John 3:34), and the Spirit accompanies and empowers Jesus up to the point of his death on the cross. The passion story of Jesus can simultaneously be understood as the story of the Spirit, even though the Spirit does not suffer the same way as Jesus does (Moltmann 1992:64; Novello 2011:94). The Holy Spirit is associated with the power of an indestructible life (Hebrews 7:16, 9:14; 2 Corinthians 13:4), and She enables Jesus to surrender to death. The participation of the Spirit in Jesus’ surrender is shaped by the Spirit’s life-giving power to make this end the new beginning: the Spirit is not only involved in the journey to the cross, but She is also the auctor resurrectionis Christi, the source of life and re-birth of everything living (Moltmann 1992:67f, with reference to Calvin, Corpus Reformatorum XLVII, 48). In the Scriptures, resurrection events are considered to be the work of the Spirit, because the Spirit of God gives new life that is beyond the power of death (Romans 1:3-4; Ephesians 1:19- 20; 1 Peter 3:18). Thomas (2002:262) contends that the New Testament authors based their perception of the resurrecting Spirit on the vision outlined by the prophet Ezekiel (Ezekiel 37) in 64. According to Rücker (1985:210) this concept of a suffering God has difficulty finding access to African ideas of power, because they generally do not match with the doctrine of a God who surrenders himself to weakness. Mbiti (1973:402) conveys the same idea by describing the opinion of an African Christian who explains that Jesus is his Savior, “not so much because of the cross but because he is linked up with the God who, by virtue of his almightiness, can and does rescue or save the needy”. Bongmba (2004:108), in his reflection on the concept of power in Africa from a theological perspective, emphasizes that the notion of God’s suffering is to be embraced: “one must insist that no conception of divine power is complete if it ignores the reality that God is a suffering God”. 65. In his Between Cross and Resurrection, Alan E. Lewis develops a theology of Holy Saturday by exploring extensively the dialectics of God’s power and glory. He takes his stance in the ‘no-man’s-land’ of Easter Saturday, in the helplessness after death and before resurrection life. 266
which the Spirit of God brings new life to the dead. Romans 8:11 is an important foundation for biblical thought on the Spirit as the Spirit of resurrection. The basic thrust of Paul’s link between the Spirit and the resurrection is that the Spirit of the Father is the One who gave life back to Jesus, and She is the same who gives life back to us. Durrwell (1986:146) says about the Spirit that “He is in the Fatherhood in whom he has his source, and in the sonship of the Son from whom he wells up. The mystery of the resurrection of Jesus is an illustration of this: the Spirit himself is the power of the resurrection which enables Christ to be the channel of the Spirit”. The Pauline emphasis on the power and the presence of the Spirit does not only reveal the Trinitarian nature of the cross and the resurrection, it also reveals that the Spirit is distinctively the One who is present in the suffering and death of Christ. It is precisely this ‘function of presence’ (Novello 2011:94) that belongs to the Spirit. In the cross, the Spirit is not subjected to the loneliness of the Son, nor does She experience loss as the Father does. Instead, the Holy Spirit is present “all the way into the horror of death, so that death will be finally conquered and transformed into life; that is, the resurrection life” (Novello 2011:95). Through being present there where no one else can be present anymore, the Spirit presents God’s faithfulness to Christ and, in the reading of Romans 8:11, also to creaturely life. In other words, the resurrection event is the other crucial event of God’s creativity, bringing chaos and hopelessness to a halt: the breath of life, the Spirit, has found a way to move past the power of death. By holding together the mourning Father and the dying Son, She is their love in the midst of agony; her presence is life in the midst of death. Dabney (2001:58) identifies the Spirit as “the Spirit of the self-sacrifice and resurrection of Jesus Christ made manifest in the Trinitarian kenosis of God on the cross, the possibility of God even in the midst of every impossibility”. This naming of the Spirit as presence and as possibility offers promising ways to reflect further on the relation between the Spirit and the resurrection of our mortal bodies. In this light, one could say that the Holy Spirit embraces the dialectics of cross and resurrection, and reveals God’s power in creative and surprising ways. She points to death in order to reveal life, to weakness in order to reveal power, to suffering in order to reveal healing. The cruciform and life-giving ways of the Spirit reveal the paradox of God’s power: in and through weakness, God has assumed power over his creation. In the cross and the resurrection, the Spirit reveals new life. This new life is not only Christ’s new and glorified life, but has become our new life as well, through the power of the Spirit. Thomas (2002:263) emphasizes that our resurrection life is not only a state of being that refers to the new world of the new creation, but includes our creaturely being, our world with its space, time and finitude as well (see also Torrance 1976, Chapter 4). In other words, the resurrection of Christ becomes relevant to our daily life through the power of the Spirit (Romans 8:11; 1 Corinthians 6:14). The Holy Spirit relates Christ’s new life to our life in such a way that we are 267
- Page 215 and 216: elationships among the Trinitarian
- Page 217 and 218: constitute an important element of
- Page 219 and 220: lost. She was caught in a vicious c
- Page 221 and 222: CHAPTER 8. THE SPIRIT AND TRANSFORM
- Page 223 and 224: system of the Christian church (…
- Page 225 and 226: 8.2.3 Spirit of adoption James Dunn
- Page 227 and 228: 8.2.4 Physicality and transformatio
- Page 229 and 230: Metaphorical language about transfo
- Page 231 and 232: Reformed thought on the theme of tr
- Page 233 and 234: that God’s plan of salvation tran
- Page 235 and 236: gift into a gift that is beneficial
- Page 237 and 238: considered a tentative condition in
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 9. THE SPIRIT AND QUALITY O
- Page 241 and 242: physical abilities, social circumst
- Page 243 and 244: The clear distinction between the C
- Page 245 and 246: Conradie 54 shows, based on Van Rul
- Page 247 and 248: could say that people’s bodies ma
- Page 249 and 250: 9.3.1 Vulnerability, creation and S
- Page 251 and 252: in the cosmos, Polkinghorne (2006:1
- Page 253 and 254: ody, and thus his or her vulnerabil
- Page 255 and 256: the Holy Spirit. Moreover, this foc
- Page 257 and 258: The acceptance of her vulnerability
- Page 259 and 260: CHAPTER 10. THE SPIRIT AND POWER Th
- Page 261 and 262: oom for creation and for the embodi
- Page 263 and 264: Migliore (2008) has the same opinio
- Page 265: 10.2 POWER AND THE HOLY SPIRIT Chri
- Page 269 and 270: life through this discontinuity:
- Page 271 and 272: interpersonal relations. Everyone s
- Page 273 and 274: God’s power is revealed through h
- Page 275 and 276: The journey consists of two main st
- Page 277 and 278: are a constructive part of it. In a
- Page 279 and 280: transformation can be defined as he
- Page 281 and 282: provided the basis for a re-visioni
- Page 283 and 284: iomedical constructions of health,
- Page 285 and 286: Attanasi, K 2008. Getting in Step w
- Page 287 and 288: — 1997. Theology of the Old Testa
- Page 289 and 290: — 2001. ‘Naming the Spirit: Tow
- Page 291 and 292: Paper for use in HIV and AIDS Progr
- Page 293 and 294: Hamilton, NQ 1957. The Holy Spirit
- Page 295 and 296: — 2007. The Next Christendom. The
- Page 297 and 298: Kraan, KJ 3 1974. ‘Opdat U genezi
- Page 299 and 300: — Luther’s Works. 1957-1986. 55
- Page 301 and 302: Müller-Fahrenholz, G 2000. The Kin
- Page 303 and 304: Pilch, JJ 2000. Healing in the New
- Page 305 and 306: Rohleder, P & Gibson, K 2006. ‘We
- Page 307 and 308: — 2011. Trends and Directions in
- Page 309 and 310: Twesigye, EK 1987. Common Ground: C
- Page 311 and 312: — 1961b. ‘Structuurverschillen
- Page 313 and 314: Warfield, BB 1946, ‘Introductory
- Page 315 and 316: Wisse, M 2004. Towards a Truly Rela
<strong>the</strong> cross po<strong>in</strong>ts to victory: God’s power is <strong>in</strong> his weakness, his death br<strong>in</strong>gs glorified life 64 . The<br />
cross st<strong>and</strong>s for death, but also <strong>in</strong>cludes resurrection mean<strong>in</strong>g. John’s <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross<br />
clearly underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong> cross as triumph over <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> death, as an “<strong>in</strong>strument <strong>and</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong><br />
victory, not <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> defeat which has to be reversed on Easter morn<strong>in</strong>g” (Marsh 1968:618;<br />
see also Bultmann 1955:56; Newbig<strong>in</strong> 1982:160; Schillebeeckx 1980:409ff). The cross <strong>and</strong><br />
resurrection are kept very close toge<strong>the</strong>r, but not <strong>in</strong> such a way that <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross is<br />
lost <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection. God’s power is established through his suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> death 65 .<br />
The tension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross <strong>and</strong> resurrection is held toge<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> God. The Spirit is <strong>the</strong><br />
Spirit <strong>of</strong> Christ, <strong>the</strong> crucified One through whom it is possible to refer to <strong>the</strong> cross as <strong>the</strong><br />
beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> new life. Moltmann (1992:60-65) identifies <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit as <strong>the</strong> One who<br />
accompanies Jesus <strong>in</strong> his life <strong>and</strong> death (see also Dabney 2001:56). Jesus receives his power to<br />
proclaim <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>in</strong> word <strong>and</strong> deed from <strong>the</strong> Spirit without limits (Luke 4:18-19,<br />
John 3:34), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit accompanies <strong>and</strong> empowers Jesus up to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> his death on <strong>the</strong><br />
cross. The passion story <strong>of</strong> Jesus can simultaneously be understood as <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit,<br />
even though <strong>the</strong> Spirit does not suffer <strong>the</strong> same way as Jesus does (Moltmann 1992:64; Novello<br />
2011:94). The Holy Spirit is associated with <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>destructible life (Hebrews 7:16,<br />
9:14; 2 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 13:4), <strong>and</strong> She enables Jesus to surrender to death. The participation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Spirit <strong>in</strong> Jesus’ surrender is shaped by <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s life-giv<strong>in</strong>g power to make this end <strong>the</strong> new<br />
beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>the</strong> Spirit is not only <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> journey to <strong>the</strong> cross, but She is also <strong>the</strong> auctor<br />
resurrectionis Christi, <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> life <strong>and</strong> re-birth <strong>of</strong> everyth<strong>in</strong>g liv<strong>in</strong>g (Moltmann 1992:67f,<br />
with reference to Calv<strong>in</strong>, Corpus Reformatorum XLVII, 48).<br />
In <strong>the</strong> Scriptures, resurrection events are considered to be <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, because <strong>the</strong><br />
Spirit <strong>of</strong> God gives new life that is beyond <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> death (Romans 1:3-4; Ephesians 1:19-<br />
20; 1 Peter 3:18). Thomas (2002:262) contends that <strong>the</strong> New Testament authors based <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrect<strong>in</strong>g Spirit on <strong>the</strong> vision outl<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> prophet Ezekiel (Ezekiel 37) <strong>in</strong><br />
64. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Rücker (1985:210) this concept <strong>of</strong> a suffer<strong>in</strong>g God has difficulty f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g access to African ideas <strong>of</strong><br />
power, because <strong>the</strong>y generally do not match with <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a God who surrenders himself to weakness. Mbiti<br />
(1973:402) conveys <strong>the</strong> same idea by describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an African Christian who expla<strong>in</strong>s that Jesus is his<br />
Savior, “not so much because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross but because he is l<strong>in</strong>ked up with <strong>the</strong> God who, by virtue <strong>of</strong> his<br />
almight<strong>in</strong>ess, can <strong>and</strong> does rescue or save <strong>the</strong> needy”. Bongmba (2004:108), <strong>in</strong> his reflection on <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong><br />
power <strong>in</strong> Africa from a <strong>the</strong>ological perspective, emphasizes that <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> God’s suffer<strong>in</strong>g is to be embraced:<br />
“one must <strong>in</strong>sist that no conception <strong>of</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power is complete if it ignores <strong>the</strong> reality that God is a suffer<strong>in</strong>g God”.<br />
65. In his Between Cross <strong>and</strong> Resurrection, Alan E. Lewis develops a <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> Holy Saturday by explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
extensively <strong>the</strong> dialectics <strong>of</strong> God’s power <strong>and</strong> glory. He takes his stance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘no-man’s-l<strong>and</strong>’ <strong>of</strong> Easter Saturday,<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> helplessness after death <strong>and</strong> before resurrection life.<br />
266