spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

the cross points to victory: God’s power is in his weakness, his death brings glorified life 64 . The cross stands for death, but also includes resurrection meaning. John’s theology of the cross clearly understands the cross as triumph over the power of death, as an “instrument and point of victory, not the point of defeat which has to be reversed on Easter morning” (Marsh 1968:618; see also Bultmann 1955:56; Newbigin 1982:160; Schillebeeckx 1980:409ff). The cross and resurrection are kept very close together, but not in such a way that the meaning of the cross is lost in the event of the resurrection. God’s power is established through his suffering and death 65 . The tension of the cross and resurrection is held together by the Spirit of God. The Spirit is the Spirit of Christ, the crucified One through whom it is possible to refer to the cross as the beginning of new life. Moltmann (1992:60-65) identifies the Holy Spirit as the One who accompanies Jesus in his life and death (see also Dabney 2001:56). Jesus receives his power to proclaim the coming Kingdom in word and deed from the Spirit without limits (Luke 4:18-19, John 3:34), and the Spirit accompanies and empowers Jesus up to the point of his death on the cross. The passion story of Jesus can simultaneously be understood as the story of the Spirit, even though the Spirit does not suffer the same way as Jesus does (Moltmann 1992:64; Novello 2011:94). The Holy Spirit is associated with the power of an indestructible life (Hebrews 7:16, 9:14; 2 Corinthians 13:4), and She enables Jesus to surrender to death. The participation of the Spirit in Jesus’ surrender is shaped by the Spirit’s life-giving power to make this end the new beginning: the Spirit is not only involved in the journey to the cross, but She is also the auctor resurrectionis Christi, the source of life and re-birth of everything living (Moltmann 1992:67f, with reference to Calvin, Corpus Reformatorum XLVII, 48). In the Scriptures, resurrection events are considered to be the work of the Spirit, because the Spirit of God gives new life that is beyond the power of death (Romans 1:3-4; Ephesians 1:19- 20; 1 Peter 3:18). Thomas (2002:262) contends that the New Testament authors based their perception of the resurrecting Spirit on the vision outlined by the prophet Ezekiel (Ezekiel 37) in 64. According to Rücker (1985:210) this concept of a suffering God has difficulty finding access to African ideas of power, because they generally do not match with the doctrine of a God who surrenders himself to weakness. Mbiti (1973:402) conveys the same idea by describing the opinion of an African Christian who explains that Jesus is his Savior, “not so much because of the cross but because he is linked up with the God who, by virtue of his almightiness, can and does rescue or save the needy”. Bongmba (2004:108), in his reflection on the concept of power in Africa from a theological perspective, emphasizes that the notion of God’s suffering is to be embraced: “one must insist that no conception of divine power is complete if it ignores the reality that God is a suffering God”. 65. In his Between Cross and Resurrection, Alan E. Lewis develops a theology of Holy Saturday by exploring extensively the dialectics of God’s power and glory. He takes his stance in the ‘no-man’s-landof Easter Saturday, in the helplessness after death and before resurrection life. 266

which the Spirit of God brings new life to the dead. Romans 8:11 is an important foundation for biblical thought on the Spirit as the Spirit of resurrection. The basic thrust of Paul’s link between the Spirit and the resurrection is that the Spirit of the Father is the One who gave life back to Jesus, and She is the same who gives life back to us. Durrwell (1986:146) says about the Spirit that “He is in the Fatherhood in whom he has his source, and in the sonship of the Son from whom he wells up. The mystery of the resurrection of Jesus is an illustration of this: the Spirit himself is the power of the resurrection which enables Christ to be the channel of the Spirit”. The Pauline emphasis on the power and the presence of the Spirit does not only reveal the Trinitarian nature of the cross and the resurrection, it also reveals that the Spirit is distinctively the One who is present in the suffering and death of Christ. It is precisely this ‘function of presence’ (Novello 2011:94) that belongs to the Spirit. In the cross, the Spirit is not subjected to the loneliness of the Son, nor does She experience loss as the Father does. Instead, the Holy Spirit is present “all the way into the horror of death, so that death will be finally conquered and transformed into life; that is, the resurrection life” (Novello 2011:95). Through being present there where no one else can be present anymore, the Spirit presents God’s faithfulness to Christ and, in the reading of Romans 8:11, also to creaturely life. In other words, the resurrection event is the other crucial event of God’s creativity, bringing chaos and hopelessness to a halt: the breath of life, the Spirit, has found a way to move past the power of death. By holding together the mourning Father and the dying Son, She is their love in the midst of agony; her presence is life in the midst of death. Dabney (2001:58) identifies the Spirit as “the Spirit of the self-sacrifice and resurrection of Jesus Christ made manifest in the Trinitarian kenosis of God on the cross, the possibility of God even in the midst of every impossibility”. This naming of the Spirit as presence and as possibility offers promising ways to reflect further on the relation between the Spirit and the resurrection of our mortal bodies. In this light, one could say that the Holy Spirit embraces the dialectics of cross and resurrection, and reveals God’s power in creative and surprising ways. She points to death in order to reveal life, to weakness in order to reveal power, to suffering in order to reveal healing. The cruciform and life-giving ways of the Spirit reveal the paradox of God’s power: in and through weakness, God has assumed power over his creation. In the cross and the resurrection, the Spirit reveals new life. This new life is not only Christ’s new and glorified life, but has become our new life as well, through the power of the Spirit. Thomas (2002:263) emphasizes that our resurrection life is not only a state of being that refers to the new world of the new creation, but includes our creaturely being, our world with its space, time and finitude as well (see also Torrance 1976, Chapter 4). In other words, the resurrection of Christ becomes relevant to our daily life through the power of the Spirit (Romans 8:11; 1 Corinthians 6:14). The Holy Spirit relates Christ’s new life to our life in such a way that we are 267

<strong>the</strong> cross po<strong>in</strong>ts to victory: God’s power is <strong>in</strong> his weakness, his death br<strong>in</strong>gs glorified life 64 . The<br />

cross st<strong>and</strong>s for death, but also <strong>in</strong>cludes resurrection mean<strong>in</strong>g. John’s <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross<br />

clearly underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong> cross as triumph over <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> death, as an “<strong>in</strong>strument <strong>and</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong><br />

victory, not <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> defeat which has to be reversed on Easter morn<strong>in</strong>g” (Marsh 1968:618;<br />

see also Bultmann 1955:56; Newbig<strong>in</strong> 1982:160; Schillebeeckx 1980:409ff). The cross <strong>and</strong><br />

resurrection are kept very close toge<strong>the</strong>r, but not <strong>in</strong> such a way that <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross is<br />

lost <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection. God’s power is established through his suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> death 65 .<br />

The tension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross <strong>and</strong> resurrection is held toge<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> God. The Spirit is <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit <strong>of</strong> Christ, <strong>the</strong> crucified One through whom it is possible to refer to <strong>the</strong> cross as <strong>the</strong><br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> new life. Moltmann (1992:60-65) identifies <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit as <strong>the</strong> One who<br />

accompanies Jesus <strong>in</strong> his life <strong>and</strong> death (see also Dabney 2001:56). Jesus receives his power to<br />

proclaim <strong>the</strong> com<strong>in</strong>g K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>in</strong> word <strong>and</strong> deed from <strong>the</strong> Spirit without limits (Luke 4:18-19,<br />

John 3:34), <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit accompanies <strong>and</strong> empowers Jesus up to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> his death on <strong>the</strong><br />

cross. The passion story <strong>of</strong> Jesus can simultaneously be understood as <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit,<br />

even though <strong>the</strong> Spirit does not suffer <strong>the</strong> same way as Jesus does (Moltmann 1992:64; Novello<br />

2011:94). The Holy Spirit is associated with <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>destructible life (Hebrews 7:16,<br />

9:14; 2 Cor<strong>in</strong>thians 13:4), <strong>and</strong> She enables Jesus to surrender to death. The participation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit <strong>in</strong> Jesus’ surrender is shaped by <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s life-giv<strong>in</strong>g power to make this end <strong>the</strong> new<br />

beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>the</strong> Spirit is not only <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> journey to <strong>the</strong> cross, but She is also <strong>the</strong> auctor<br />

resurrectionis Christi, <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> life <strong>and</strong> re-birth <strong>of</strong> everyth<strong>in</strong>g liv<strong>in</strong>g (Moltmann 1992:67f,<br />

with reference to Calv<strong>in</strong>, Corpus Reformatorum XLVII, 48).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Scriptures, resurrection events are considered to be <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, because <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit <strong>of</strong> God gives new life that is beyond <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> death (Romans 1:3-4; Ephesians 1:19-<br />

20; 1 Peter 3:18). Thomas (2002:262) contends that <strong>the</strong> New Testament authors based <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrect<strong>in</strong>g Spirit on <strong>the</strong> vision outl<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> prophet Ezekiel (Ezekiel 37) <strong>in</strong><br />

64. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Rücker (1985:210) this concept <strong>of</strong> a suffer<strong>in</strong>g God has difficulty f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g access to African ideas <strong>of</strong><br />

power, because <strong>the</strong>y generally do not match with <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> a God who surrenders himself to weakness. Mbiti<br />

(1973:402) conveys <strong>the</strong> same idea by describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> an African Christian who expla<strong>in</strong>s that Jesus is his<br />

Savior, “not so much because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross but because he is l<strong>in</strong>ked up with <strong>the</strong> God who, by virtue <strong>of</strong> his<br />

almight<strong>in</strong>ess, can <strong>and</strong> does rescue or save <strong>the</strong> needy”. Bongmba (2004:108), <strong>in</strong> his reflection on <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong><br />

power <strong>in</strong> Africa from a <strong>the</strong>ological perspective, emphasizes that <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> God’s suffer<strong>in</strong>g is to be embraced:<br />

“one must <strong>in</strong>sist that no conception <strong>of</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power is complete if it ignores <strong>the</strong> reality that God is a suffer<strong>in</strong>g God”.<br />

65. In his Between Cross <strong>and</strong> Resurrection, Alan E. Lewis develops a <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> Holy Saturday by explor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

extensively <strong>the</strong> dialectics <strong>of</strong> God’s power <strong>and</strong> glory. He takes his stance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘no-man’s-l<strong>and</strong>’ <strong>of</strong> Easter Saturday,<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> helplessness after death <strong>and</strong> before resurrection life.<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!