23.06.2013 Views

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, who is <strong>the</strong> key for “abundant life <strong>in</strong> a precarious socio-economic <strong>and</strong> political<br />

environment” (Kalu 2002:129). Asamoah-Gyadu (2007:307) confirms <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>extricable l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

between Holy Spirit <strong>and</strong> power when he says that “Pentecostalism is about <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit” (see also Gräbe 2002:236f; Anderson 2002:525).<br />

The Pentecostal approach to power can generally be identified as a thaumaturgical <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong><br />

power. This means that this <strong>the</strong>ology presupposes <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>sists that it is possible for humans to<br />

experience <strong>the</strong> extraord<strong>in</strong>ary effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supernatural <strong>in</strong> creaturely life (Wilson 1969:368). The<br />

Holy Spirit is capable <strong>of</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> people <strong>in</strong> order to address <strong>the</strong>ir human needs<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus to reveal <strong>the</strong> victory <strong>of</strong> God’s righteousness (cf. Asamoah-Gyadu 2007:306). The focus<br />

on <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit is, <strong>the</strong>refore, rooted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> perception <strong>of</strong> reality as an open reality<br />

where div<strong>in</strong>e power <strong>in</strong>tervenes on behalf <strong>of</strong> believers. One aspect <strong>of</strong> such a pneumatology <strong>of</strong><br />

power is <strong>the</strong> hope for personal benefits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present. Prosperity <strong>and</strong> deliverance from evil<br />

forces are perceived as signs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s power. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>e power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit transpires <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit to address existential, this-worldly needs <strong>and</strong> to turn<br />

<strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong>to situations <strong>of</strong> abundance. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Anderson (1990:73), this pneumatology <strong>of</strong><br />

power dist<strong>in</strong>guishes Pentecostalism from o<strong>the</strong>r traditions.<br />

The manifestation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit also refers to victory over evil, allow<strong>in</strong>g believers to<br />

live victoriously. As Anderson (1991:72) has po<strong>in</strong>ted out, Pentecostal <strong>the</strong>ologies have <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

justifiably been criticized with regard to an overemphasis on power <strong>and</strong> success at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong><br />

a <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross (see also Gräbe 2002:242; Fudge 2003). The power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

to a particular underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> salvation, a holistic <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> salvation: salvation is not seen<br />

“exclusively <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> salvation from s<strong>in</strong>ful acts <strong>and</strong> from eternal condemnation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

hereafter (…), but also <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> salvation from sickness (<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>), from evil <strong>spirit</strong>is<br />

(exorcism), <strong>and</strong> from o<strong>the</strong>r forms <strong>of</strong> misfortunes” (Anderson 2001:233; see also Anderson<br />

2002:527; Mat<strong>the</strong>y 2004:407). In general, it can be said that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g,<br />

div<strong>in</strong>e power is seen as experiential, <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> soteriological. In response to criticism on<br />

Pentecostalism’s heavy emphasis on pneumatological soteriology, Amos Yong (2005:111f, with<br />

reference to Dabney 2000:511-524) proposes a constructive approach to a pneumatology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cross, whereby <strong>the</strong> Spirit is not only seen as <strong>the</strong> One who has resurrection power, but also as <strong>the</strong><br />

One who leads followers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son to <strong>the</strong>ir crosses.<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>and</strong> eventually underm<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole African cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Even though one could<br />

question Ngong’s implicit redef<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> salvation for Africa (namely as a prom<strong>in</strong>ent position for Africa <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

global political economy, p. 147), his proposal to reflect fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> deeper on African pneumatological soteriology<br />

is <strong>in</strong>novative.<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!