spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

humble servant. This humility of Christ was applied to the divine attribute of omnipotence, so that God’s weakness was understood as God’s power. The revised concept of divine power suggested that power could be seen as a relational category without aspects of dominance and self-sufficiency. As a result, attention was now directed to the relational dimension of God’s power: that is, God’s power is found in his ability to save creation (see for example Janzen 1975:379-406; Berkhof 1986:140-146; Ford 1987:233-238; Case- Winters 1990:201-232). Instead of holding on to an identification of divine power as selfsufficient, there was increasing interest for the conceptualization of divine power as shared power, as “the capacity both to influence and to be influenced by others” (Loomers 1976:17). The novum of this understanding of divine power as relational power is not so much that the scope of divine power is at stake, but rather that new dimensions of God’s omnipotence are articulated. These newly addressed dimensions also have theological-anthropological implications. The process-feminist synthesis proposal by Case-Winters (1990) is a good example: by understanding divine power as shared, persuasive power (instead of all-determining causal power), there is a new opportunity to reflect on God’s omnipotence as an empowering and life-giving force. The implication is that God’s power does not eliminate the relative independence and power of the human being, but, instead, uses them for the glory of God and the well-being of creation (Case-Winters 1990:231). Another attempt to move beyond the classic definition of power as domination is offered by Kyle Pasewark (1993). A major contribution to the redefinition of power can be found in his effort to retrieve the theme of power from political theory. Pasewark criticizes the tendency to reflect on power in mere political categories since this reduces power to dominance (‘power over’). Instead, he emphasizes (based on Foucault, and in the footsteps of Luther and Tillich) the ubiquity of power. Power is present in all dimensions of life, and is to be defined as ‘the communication of efficacy’ (1993:197ff). That is, the communication of life that has its origins in God. Pasewark’s proposal to understand power as the communication of life is rooted in Luther’s understanding that the power of God is always used for us. In this light, Pasewark redefines power as dominance (‘power over’) to power that exist only in relationships (‘power to’). 61 61. Despite Pasewark’s firm rejection of power in terms of political terms, one could conclude that the redefinition of power as the communication of efficacy could still be understood as a form of dominant power (cf. Kearsley 2008:37). 262

Migliore (2008) has the same opinion about a redefinition of the nature of God’s power. He makes a case for understanding God’s power as shared power on the basis of the doctrine of the Trinity. His claim is that the living God, whose life is communal or social by nature, is “the power of self-giving love” (2008:82). Migliore shows that a full understanding of God’s power will have a profound impact on Christian life. The power of self-giving love of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit can reshape the ways in which power is exerted in human life, both by individuals and communities. Christian politics, inspired by the power of God, is directly linked with forgiveness, hospitality to strangers and prayer for God’s coming reign. Reformed understandings of the concept of divine power seem to embrace two opposite perspectives: divine power as a self-sufficient or relational power. A rather radical shift from solitary power to shared power can be noted in Reformed discourse. The conceptual imprecision of the biblical concepts of power, in combination with global societal changes, contributed to the absence of nuance in Reformed theology on power. In other words, one could say that Reformed theology works with an underdeveloped notion of divine power. 10.1.2 Pentecostal understanding of power Another theological perspective on God’s power has been developed by the growing field of Pentecostal theologies 62 . Sykes (2006:107) places the Reformed understanding of divine power as weakness (as antagonistic to power) over against the Pentecostal emphasis on the importance of signs and wonders through God’s power. In Pentecostal theologies, divine power is understood as the power of the Spirit that enables the believer to exist in a way that corresponds with God’s intentions (cf. Anderson 1991:120). One of the often mentioned aspects of Pentecostal pneumatologies is that the Holy Spirit is represented as the power that enables believers to conquer evil forces and malevolent spirits. The Holy Spirit is the enabler who brings victory in spiritual warfare, and who is considered as the “new Christian change-agent” (Kalu 2002:122; see also Anderson 2002:527). Gräbe (2002:241) contends that “the Pentecostal message of God’s life-giving power, which delivers from evil and allows one to feel safe in a hostile world, is relevant to the existential world of Africa. The message of African Christianity must provide for the existential this-worldly needs, and not only for the life to come”. The Holy Spirit is thus perceived as the divine power who guarantees fullness of life in the here and now (see Ngong 2010:2) 63 . Pentecostal theology of power, therefore, hinges on the person and the 62. The chapter on church-based healing discourse addressed briefly the Pentecostal conceptualization of the power of the Spirit, and came to the conclusion that the question of power is central in Pentecostal discourse. 63. In his work on the Holy Spirit and salvation in African Christian theology (2010), David Tonghou Ngong resists this kind of popular pneumatological soteriology, because according to him this approach restricts the African 263

Migliore (2008) has <strong>the</strong> same op<strong>in</strong>ion about a redef<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> God’s power. He<br />

makes a case for underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g God’s power as shared power on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Tr<strong>in</strong>ity. His claim is that <strong>the</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g God, whose life is communal or social by nature, is “<strong>the</strong><br />

power <strong>of</strong> self-giv<strong>in</strong>g love” (2008:82). Migliore shows that a full underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> God’s power<br />

will have a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on Christian life. The power <strong>of</strong> self-giv<strong>in</strong>g love <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, Son<br />

<strong>and</strong> Holy Spirit can reshape <strong>the</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which power is exerted <strong>in</strong> human life, both by<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> communities. Christian politics, <strong>in</strong>spired by <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> God, is directly l<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

with forgiveness, hospitality to strangers <strong>and</strong> prayer for God’s com<strong>in</strong>g reign.<br />

Reformed underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power seem to embrace two opposite<br />

perspectives: div<strong>in</strong>e power as a self-sufficient or relational power. A ra<strong>the</strong>r radical shift from<br />

solitary power to shared power can be noted <strong>in</strong> Reformed discourse. The conceptual imprecision<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biblical concepts <strong>of</strong> power, <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with global societal changes, contributed to <strong>the</strong><br />

absence <strong>of</strong> nuance <strong>in</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology on power. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, one could say that Reformed<br />

<strong>the</strong>ology works with an underdeveloped notion <strong>of</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power.<br />

10.1.2 Pentecostal underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> power<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ological perspective on God’s power has been developed by <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g field <strong>of</strong><br />

Pentecostal <strong>the</strong>ologies 62 . Sykes (2006:107) places <strong>the</strong> Reformed underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power<br />

as weakness (as antagonistic to power) over aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal emphasis on <strong>the</strong> importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> signs <strong>and</strong> wonders through God’s power. In Pentecostal <strong>the</strong>ologies, div<strong>in</strong>e power is<br />

understood as <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit that enables <strong>the</strong> believer to exist <strong>in</strong> a way that corresponds<br />

with God’s <strong>in</strong>tentions (cf. Anderson 1991:120). One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten mentioned aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

Pentecostal pneumatologies is that <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit is represented as <strong>the</strong> power that enables<br />

believers to conquer evil forces <strong>and</strong> malevolent <strong>spirit</strong>s. The Holy Spirit is <strong>the</strong> enabler who br<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

victory <strong>in</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual warfare, <strong>and</strong> who is considered as <strong>the</strong> “new Christian change-agent” (Kalu<br />

2002:122; see also Anderson 2002:527). Gräbe (2002:241) contends that “<strong>the</strong> Pentecostal<br />

message <strong>of</strong> God’s life-giv<strong>in</strong>g power, which delivers from evil <strong>and</strong> allows one to feel safe <strong>in</strong> a<br />

hostile world, is relevant to <strong>the</strong> existential world <strong>of</strong> Africa. The message <strong>of</strong> African Christianity<br />

must provide for <strong>the</strong> existential this-worldly needs, <strong>and</strong> not only for <strong>the</strong> life to come”. The Holy<br />

Spirit is thus perceived as <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e power who guarantees fullness <strong>of</strong> life <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> here <strong>and</strong> now<br />

(see Ngong 2010:2) 63 . Pentecostal <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> power, <strong>the</strong>refore, h<strong>in</strong>ges on <strong>the</strong> person <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

62. The chapter on church-based <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> discourse addressed briefly <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal conceptualization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> power<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, <strong>and</strong> came to <strong>the</strong> conclusion that <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> power is central <strong>in</strong> Pentecostal discourse.<br />

63. In his work on <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>and</strong> salvation <strong>in</strong> African Christian <strong>the</strong>ology (2010), David Tonghou Ngong resists<br />

this k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> popular pneumatological soteriology, because accord<strong>in</strong>g to him this approach restricts <strong>the</strong> African<br />

263

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!