spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

its own which is not incongruous with God’s rationality”. The dynamic contingency of creation means that creation is not considered independent from God, and that creation has a certain quality of its own because it is created through the “sheer mystery of God’s love, which knows no reason beyond its own ultimateness as the Love that God is” (Torrance 1979:333). Recently, scientific studies give account of the contingent nature of the universe. In the discourse on natural sciences, there is a growing consensus that the natural order is characterized by both orderliness and contingency. Natural scientists are responding to the feeling that there is more to the world than can be traced by empirical research, and they have developed the insight that there is a certain elusiveness in the natural order. One significant development in the discourse on natural sciences is the connection between the physical structures of the cosmos and God the Creator. This development gave rise to the current dialogue between theology and natural sciences (see, for example, Torrance 1979, 1981; Polkinghorne 1987, 1998, 2006, 2010; Worthing 1995; Yong 2006:183-204). The Scot T.F. Torrance has been one of the first theologians who applied the aspect of contingency to explain the relationship between Creator and creation, denoting that the universe, with its openness to a variety of possible interpretations, is dependent upon the unlimited rationality and freedom of the Creator (cf. Torrance 1979:334). Polkinghorne (1987:64) emphasizes the same relatedness and contingency of nature, when he states that “the evolving process of the world depends for its fruitfulness upon a delicate interplay between chance and necessity”, in which he recognizes God as the Sustainer of the world. 9.2.2 Renewal of creation The understanding that the being of creation is qualified by divine love also refers to the notion of renewal of creation. Creation is damaged by the presence of evil, which “prevents the creation from fulfilling its proper purpose” (Gunton 1997a:143). The redemption of creation is based on the presence, the providence and the efficacies of a loving God, who has the well-being of creation in mind. Therefore, the relation between Creator and cosmic life also means that God aims at the recovery of creation, individually as well as collectively, and in the present as well as eschatologically. Gods continuously redemptive work towards creation reveals that creation is involved in a process of qualitative renewal. God’s redemptive work is focused on the preservation of the quality of creation, over against the power of evil. The relationship between salvation and creation can be perceived in various ways. 244

Conradie 54 shows, based on Van Ruler’s typology, that there are four different perceptions of this relationship 55 , and he focuses on the classic Reformed position which considers salvation as re-creation. In contrast with the idea of creatio nova, and in contrast with the idea of elevation, re-creation implies that ultimately every aspect of creation will be permeated with God’s wholeness (salvation), and that the whole being of creation will be sanctified. Re-creation emphasizes continuation, the preservation of the initial creation. Creation, indeed, needs to be renewed by God due to the reality of sin, but simultaneously creation is of a quality that cannot be replaced. In the perception of salvation as re-creation, the notion of coram Deo plays an important role as well. The Reformed perspective stresses that our entire reality is lived before God, and that there is no separation between secular and religious dimensions of creaturely life. So there is no aspect of creation that falls outside the horizon of God’s love. Coram Deo means that the focus is not so much on “the horizon, God, but on the moving space of creaturely and cosmic existence that is encompassed and transformed by this horizon. This space is a space constituted by the relation between God and cosmos and among God and creatures in their individuality, sociality, and interdependence” (Culp 2010:6). One could also say that the notion of coram Deo implies that the entire creation is influenced by God’s love, which says something about the goodness of creation. 9.2.3 Vulnerability of creation The doctrine of creation is about the meaning of creaturely life in relation to the Creator. This meaning also refers to the quality of creaturely life in all its forms. The motifs of God’s creative love and of creation’s contingency explain the relationship between God and creation: the world depends on God for its order and well-being. The biblical creation stories witness to the same idea, namely that the breath of God gives life to everything that exists. The human being is formed from the dust of the ground, and filled with the breath of life by the Spirit. This perspective draws attention to a particular aspect of creaturely life: that is, its physicality and 54. Conradie, EM. Creation and salvation? The legacy of the reformed term re-creatio. Forthcoming. 55. The four different accents in the relationship between salvation and creation are (1) the concept of nova creation, which means that the first creation will be replaced by an entirely new creation where there is no space for evil and suffering; (2) the notion of elevation, meaning that created nature has to be complemented by divine grace in order to reach a higher level of reality; the implication is that this creation is of inferior quality; (3) the notion of predicatio, which refers to the sinfulness of creation; creation will never be free of sinfulness, but creation is declared righteous before God on the basis of the predicatio of God’s word in this world; and (4) the notion of sanctification, which means that the emphasis is on the renewal of creation on the basis of its focus on God. 245

its own which is not <strong>in</strong>congruous with God’s rationality”. The dynamic cont<strong>in</strong>gency <strong>of</strong> creation<br />

means that creation is not considered <strong>in</strong>dependent from God, <strong>and</strong> that creation has a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

quality <strong>of</strong> its own because it is created through <strong>the</strong> “sheer mystery <strong>of</strong> God’s love, which knows<br />

no reason beyond its own ultimateness as <strong>the</strong> Love that God is” (Torrance 1979:333).<br />

Recently, scientific studies give account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gent nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> universe. In <strong>the</strong> discourse<br />

on natural sciences, <strong>the</strong>re is a grow<strong>in</strong>g consensus that <strong>the</strong> natural order is characterized by both<br />

orderl<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency. Natural scientists are respond<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> feel<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>re is more to<br />

<strong>the</strong> world than can be traced by empirical research, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y have developed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a certa<strong>in</strong> elusiveness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural order. One significant development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> discourse<br />

on natural sciences is <strong>the</strong> connection between <strong>the</strong> physical structures <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cosmos <strong>and</strong> God <strong>the</strong><br />

Creator. This development gave rise to <strong>the</strong> current dialogue between <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>and</strong> natural<br />

sciences (see, for example, Torrance 1979, 1981; Polk<strong>in</strong>ghorne 1987, 1998, 2006, 2010;<br />

Worth<strong>in</strong>g 1995; Yong 2006:183-204). The Scot T.F. Torrance has been one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />

<strong>the</strong>ologians who applied <strong>the</strong> aspect <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship between Creator<br />

<strong>and</strong> creation, denot<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> universe, with its openness to a variety <strong>of</strong> possible <strong>in</strong>terpretations,<br />

is dependent upon <strong>the</strong> unlimited rationality <strong>and</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Creator (cf. Torrance 1979:334).<br />

Polk<strong>in</strong>ghorne (1987:64) emphasizes <strong>the</strong> same relatedness <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency <strong>of</strong> nature, when he<br />

states that “<strong>the</strong> evolv<strong>in</strong>g process <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world depends for its fruitfulness upon a delicate<br />

<strong>in</strong>terplay between chance <strong>and</strong> necessity”, <strong>in</strong> which he recognizes God as <strong>the</strong> Susta<strong>in</strong>er <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

world.<br />

9.2.2 Renewal <strong>of</strong> creation<br />

The underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> creation is qualified by div<strong>in</strong>e love also refers to <strong>the</strong> notion<br />

<strong>of</strong> renewal <strong>of</strong> creation. Creation is damaged by <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> evil, which “prevents <strong>the</strong> creation<br />

from fulfill<strong>in</strong>g its proper purpose” (Gunton 1997a:143). The redemption <strong>of</strong> creation is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> presence, <strong>the</strong> providence <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficacies <strong>of</strong> a lov<strong>in</strong>g God, who has <strong>the</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

creation <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> relation between Creator <strong>and</strong> cosmic life also means that God<br />

aims at <strong>the</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> creation, <strong>in</strong>dividually as well as collectively, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present as well as<br />

eschatologically. Gods cont<strong>in</strong>uously redemptive work towards creation reveals that creation is<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> a process <strong>of</strong> qualitative renewal.<br />

God’s redemptive work is focused on <strong>the</strong> preservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> creation, over aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong><br />

power <strong>of</strong> evil. The relationship between salvation <strong>and</strong> creation can be perceived <strong>in</strong> various ways.<br />

244

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!