spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
PART I. EXPLORING THE AFRICAN HORIZON: DISCOURSES ON HEALTH CHAPTER 1. THE FABRIC OF HEALTH IN AFRICA The assertion that Reformed church and theology in Africa need to address the believers’ quest for healing and well-being by developing adequate or corresponding theological views on health, illness and healing, poses at least one big challenge to this research. After all, what is ‘health’ exactly? And what kind of expectations, experiences and perceptions do African believers have pertaining to healing? This first chapter is an exploration of how ‘health’ can be understood so that it will be clear which conceptualization(s) of health will be employed in this research. There are essentially two parts to this exploration of health conceptualization: first a substantiation of the use of health as a social construct (1.3), and second the acknowledgment of the existence of multiple health discourses in the African context (1.4). 1.1 WHAT IS HEALTH? Health issues are regularly addressed in everyday conversations, and every society is seriously concerned with public health and healthcare. There is an abundance of adverts for body-care products, books and magazines about fitness, and the media are filled with stories about health such as obese children, healthcare budget, fundraising for the fight against cancer and diabetes and HIV/AIDS in Africa. The pitfall of health as a prominent and universal concern is the tendency to forget to specify what is meant by ‘health’, because it is assumed that everyone’s understanding of the term ‘health’ is the same. However, the answer to the question ‘what is health?’ is fully determined by one’s own perspective, where in the world one lives, by one’s age, one’s gender and one’s financial status. In other words, a universal definition of health does not exist. 1.1.1 Who’s definition of health The lack of a universal definition of health is generally compensated for by the definition of the World Health Organization (as formulated in the preamble of its constitution in 1948): “health is a state of overall physical, mental, and social wellbeing that does not consist solely in the absence of illness or infirmity” (World Health Organization 1992). The authoritative WHO definition reveals the aim to move beyond defining ‘health’ as the mere absence of illness and 24
physical affliction, and it points towards ‘health’ as a multi-dimensional and holistic concept. The somewhat one-sided focus on somatic aspects and diseases, an approach that has a long history in Western medicine going back to classical antiquity, is left behind and now the psychological, social and spiritual elements of health are acknowledged as well. This broadening of the concept of health corresponds well with most non-Western medical traditions based on their holistic concept of health. Notwithstanding this important merit of emphasizing various dimensions of health, the WHO definition still remains a modern Western product that was formulated in the aftermath of World War II: peace and health were now seen as inseparable, and “deeply held assumptions about progress and perfectibility, and the role that science can and should play in the direction of human affairs” (Brady et.al. 1997:272) gave rise to the WHO definition of health. This perspective discloses mainly Western ideas concerning health as the inevitable result of human progress overcoming economic and social difficulties. Consequently, it turns health as a desirable and blissful circumstance into health as a fundamental human right. The often raised question is whether the WHO definition can function as an effective working concept in studies of health and disease. The main complication has to do with the fact that a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being refers much more to happiness than to health. Equating health with happiness has at least two main consequences for the concept of health as a universal right: any disturbance to happiness (which is strictly subjective) may be viewed as a health problem which could lead to an unlimited demand for health services; and any effort to guarantee happiness for every individual will be difficult to align with striving for justice and equity in health (care). The WHO definition of health has to be appreciated for the emphasis on the various coherent dimensions of health, although this approach remains utopian. 1.1.2 Two basic approaches to health Besides the well-known, yet utopian and, therefore, inapplicable definition of the WHO there are two basic approaches that influence the existing understandings of health, illness and healing. These two approaches of how health is conceived tend to differ enormously, and often cause trouble for those who would like to embrace both health models (cf. Engel 1977:132). The biomedical model The biomedical approach to health is the most dominant perspective within the health discourse, and it offers a very familiar health theory and knowledge framework for many people. The biomedical model is represented by the image of a hospital or clinic, well-educated medical 25
- Page 1 and 2: SPIRIT AND HEALING IN AFRICA: A REF
- Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It feels like this
- Page 5 and 6: I would like to believe that my chi
- Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 11 1
- Page 9 and 10: PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUM
- Page 11 and 12: INTRODUCTION 1. Research background
- Page 13 and 14: and her status? Does the Bible not
- Page 15 and 16: traditional healing, the HIV/AIDS c
- Page 17 and 18: This thesis centralizes the proper,
- Page 19 and 20: subject of health within the variou
- Page 21 and 22: 7. Research outline This research c
- Page 23: and materiality. The answers to thi
- Page 27 and 28: 1.2 MEANING OF SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIS
- Page 29 and 30: trust) that can influence health an
- Page 31 and 32: 1.3.2 Discourse When one follows th
- Page 33 and 34: still resists a clear definition an
- Page 35 and 36: the study of African healing starte
- Page 37 and 38: industrialized world” (Helman 200
- Page 39 and 40: produced, that a certain gesture re
- Page 41 and 42: influence in Southern Africa. The a
- Page 43 and 44: collective experiences, codes of th
- Page 45 and 46: However, despite many attempts to a
- Page 47 and 48: impact on African indigenous cultur
- Page 49 and 50: Suffering as a relational matter
- Page 51 and 52: situation in which one is actively
- Page 53 and 54: particular rituals are subject to c
- Page 55 and 56: Ngoma’s ability to recreate socie
- Page 57 and 58: 2.4 BORDERS OF AFRICAN TRADITIONAL
- Page 59 and 60: carefully balance their practices a
- Page 61 and 62: connection with the human beings wh
- Page 63 and 64: ancestors and other spirits is impo
- Page 65 and 66: a network of vessels through which
- Page 67 and 68: healing, because relationships are
- Page 69 and 70: esistance. Without denying that mis
- Page 71 and 72: century it turned out that the medi
- Page 73 and 74: scientific insights. The rigid Enli
PART I. EXPLORING THE AFRICAN HORIZON: DISCOURSES<br />
ON HEALTH<br />
CHAPTER 1. THE FABRIC OF HEALTH IN AFRICA<br />
The assertion that Reformed church <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> Africa need to address <strong>the</strong> believers’ quest<br />
for <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g by develop<strong>in</strong>g adequate or correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ological views on health,<br />
illness <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, poses at least one big challenge to this research. After all, what is ‘health’<br />
exactly? And what k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> expectations, experiences <strong>and</strong> perceptions do African believers have<br />
perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>? This first chapter is an exploration <strong>of</strong> how ‘health’ can be understood so<br />
that it will be clear which conceptualization(s) <strong>of</strong> health will be employed <strong>in</strong> this research. There<br />
are essentially two parts to this exploration <strong>of</strong> health conceptualization: first a substantiation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> health as a social construct (1.3), <strong>and</strong> second <strong>the</strong> acknowledgment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong><br />
multiple health discourses <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> African context (1.4).<br />
1.1 WHAT IS HEALTH?<br />
Health issues are regularly addressed <strong>in</strong> everyday conversations, <strong>and</strong> every society is seriously<br />
concerned with public health <strong>and</strong> healthcare. There is an abundance <strong>of</strong> adverts for body-care<br />
products, books <strong>and</strong> magaz<strong>in</strong>es about fitness, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> media are filled with stories about health<br />
such as obese children, healthcare budget, fundrais<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong> fight aga<strong>in</strong>st cancer <strong>and</strong> diabetes<br />
<strong>and</strong> HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Africa. The pitfall <strong>of</strong> health as a prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>and</strong> universal concern is <strong>the</strong><br />
tendency to forget to specify what is meant by ‘health’, because it is assumed that everyone’s<br />
underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term ‘health’ is <strong>the</strong> same. However, <strong>the</strong> answer to <strong>the</strong> question ‘what is<br />
health?’ is fully determ<strong>in</strong>ed by one’s own perspective, where <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world one lives, by one’s<br />
age, one’s gender <strong>and</strong> one’s f<strong>in</strong>ancial status. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, a universal def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> health does<br />
not exist.<br />
1.1.1 Who’s def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> health<br />
The lack <strong>of</strong> a universal def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> health is generally compensated for by <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
World Health Organization (as formulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preamble <strong>of</strong> its constitution <strong>in</strong> 1948): “health is<br />
a state <strong>of</strong> overall physical, mental, <strong>and</strong> social wellbe<strong>in</strong>g that does not consist solely <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
absence <strong>of</strong> illness or <strong>in</strong>firmity” (World Health Organization 1992). The authoritative WHO<br />
def<strong>in</strong>ition reveals <strong>the</strong> aim to move beyond def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘health’ as <strong>the</strong> mere absence <strong>of</strong> illness <strong>and</strong><br />
24