23.06.2013 Views

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Heal<strong>in</strong>g refers to every aspect <strong>of</strong> human life as hav<strong>in</strong>g a place <strong>and</strong> purpose <strong>in</strong> God’s desire to<br />

restore creation.<br />

8.4. CONCLUSIONS<br />

This chapter forms a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exploration <strong>in</strong>to possibilities <strong>of</strong> speak<strong>in</strong>g about God <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> this chapter was to show that one way <strong>of</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g articulations about God <strong>and</strong> health<br />

could be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>of</strong> transformation. This <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> transformation was retrieved by<br />

engag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> discourse <strong>of</strong> missionary medic<strong>in</strong>e (as an African health discourse) with Reformed<br />

pneumatological discourse. In both discourses, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> transformation is considered highly<br />

significant.<br />

The missionary medic<strong>in</strong>e discourse, with its focus on transformation <strong>in</strong> various forms, has<br />

already been described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 3 <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis. Transformation was understood as an<br />

existential change located at <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tersection <strong>of</strong> materiality (body) <strong>and</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>uality (soul),<br />

whereby <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> referred to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended transformation. In this chapter, missionary<br />

medic<strong>in</strong>e’s concept <strong>of</strong> transformation was related to <strong>the</strong>ological discourse, provok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

question what transformation precisely means <strong>in</strong> Reformed pneumatology, <strong>and</strong> whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

transformation can be articulated only metaphorically? To what extent are <strong>the</strong> aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

physicality <strong>and</strong> materiality <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Reformed pneumatological perceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

transformation? Where <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> metaphor <strong>of</strong> adoption <strong>and</strong> transformation does <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

fit <strong>in</strong>?<br />

In Reformed soteriological discourse, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> transformation is mostly associated with <strong>the</strong><br />

event <strong>of</strong> justification <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> believer’s union with Christ through <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. These<br />

form <strong>the</strong> heart <strong>of</strong> Reformed soteriology, <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> metaphor <strong>of</strong> adoption is firmly rooted.<br />

Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology uses metaphorical language to refer to transformation, because <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> believer’s transformation is elusive <strong>and</strong> beyond def<strong>in</strong>ition. The use <strong>of</strong> metaphors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

is important <strong>and</strong> necessary <strong>in</strong> order to refer to someth<strong>in</strong>g that cannot be said <strong>in</strong> a direct way.<br />

They help to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> a new identity <strong>in</strong> God, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> metaphor <strong>of</strong> adoption, <strong>in</strong><br />

particular, embraces <strong>the</strong> idea that this new identity <strong>in</strong>cludes our physicality <strong>and</strong> materiality.<br />

Reformed perceptions <strong>of</strong> transformation, thus, <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> physical dimension. Yet, when it<br />

comes to literal transformation <strong>and</strong> real physical <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> directly related to God’s salvation,<br />

Reformed thought rema<strong>in</strong>s silent. The voice <strong>of</strong> Karel Kraan, whose view on ‘realiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

eschatology’ has major implications for <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k between transformation <strong>and</strong> physicality, is an<br />

exception <strong>in</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology. In his perspective, God’s salvation became fully real <strong>and</strong><br />

immediately effective <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrection <strong>of</strong> Christ. As a result, physical <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is not to be<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!