spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
The centrality of the motif of transformation in missionary medicine discourse has its background in Reformed thought on conversion and transformation. In Reformed thought, transformation is conceptualized as the process of reorientation of life, after the believer has accepted what Christ has done for the salvation of the believer. This transformation is a gradual process of change that is part of the union with Christ, following the conversion to the triune God. The role of the Holy Spirit is perceived as crucial in the process of transformation. In the exploration of new avenues for expressing the link between Spirit and healing, the centrality of the motif of transformation in missionary medicine discourse evokes certain questions that will be addressed in this chapter. These question are: what exactly is meant with ‘transformation’ in Reformed pneumatological discourse? To what extent do Reformed pneumatological perceptions of transformation provide space for categories of physicality and materiality? Or is it in Reformed pneumatology only possible to speak of transformation in metaphorical language? 8.2 TRANSFORMATION IN REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGY Reformed understanding of the transformation of the believer starts with God’s history of redemption. In line with biblical testimony, the emphasis is on God’s saving work. The theme of God’s salvation is central in the Scriptures, where we witness what God has done for us, with Christ’s suffering and resurrection as the climax. The biblical breadth of salvation implies that salvation (salus as health and wholeness) is not only to be understood in personal terms but also in cosmic terms: God’s desire for wholeness includes the transformation of humans in their relationship with God and other persons, as well as the restoration of all of creation (Plantinga 2010:313-320). 8.2.1 Justification and spiritual transformation In classic Protestant theology, the moment of justification became a central tenet of salvation, because it emphasized God’s initiative in the salvation of mankind. Luther’s rediscovery of the Pauline notion of justification by faith was a retrieval of the idea that only God is the One who graciously saves, and who can make a sinner righteous; the believer him- or herself is not able to contribute to his or her salvation by works or other merits, let alone achieve it. No one is able to justify oneself before God. The doctrine of justification received a normative status (Dunn 1998:332), and came to play a crucial role in Reformed understanding of salvation. McGrath (2005:1f) describes the importance of the doctrine of justification for Protestant theology as follows: “the Christian doctrine of justification (…) constitutes the real centre of the theological 222
system of the Christian church (…). There never was, and there never can be, any true Christian church without the doctrine of justification (…) the articulus stantis et cadentis ecclesiae”. The prominence of the doctrine of justification points to the significance of God’s grace in the life of the believer. It also contributed, however, to the tendency to separate justification and sanctification in the Reformed ordo salutis: the clear distinction between the event of justification and the process of sanctification is a typical feature of Reformed theology, that did not exist earlier. Prior to Luther, justification was indissolubly linked with regeneration (or sanctification), and was perceived as a comprehensive event, in which the sinner was declared righteous before God and simultaneously underwent a substantial change of life. The external status (before God) and the internal nature of the believer were transformed in the moment of conversion through faith in Christ. It was later that Luther introduced a decisive break with current medieval Western theology, by declaring that the believer was internally sinful and externally righteous (McGrath 2005:213). Justification by faith in Christ alone, means that justification is localized in the relation with Christ. The implication of justification as a union with Christ is that the justification of the believer entails that the believer is being ‘covered’ with Christ. In Luther’s perspective, the believer is not actually made righteous, but he or she is considered as righteous in the eyes of God through Christ. Justification is, thus, that the imputed righteousness of Christ reconciles the believer with God. This understanding of justification as imputed righteousness of Christ means that the aspect of the believer’s transformation received less emphasis in order to avoid the suggestion that the believer was actively involved in his or her own justification and salvation. In typical Protestant Reformed terminology, justification is to be expressed in forensic language, while the process of sanctification refers to the transformative aspects of Christian life. Sanctification as the regeneration of the believer, based on his or her active righteousness, is a process that is viewed as separate from the initial and instantaneous event of the justification of the believer. The Reformed forensic understanding of justification encouraged an emphasis on spiritual transformation: the union with Christ involved primarily the soul, since the union was perceived as fully spiritual, without any physical elements (McGrath 2005:255). The sinner remained sinful, but the spiritual union with Christ meant that the sinner was justified simultaneously. The central importance of justification thus led to the perception of transformation as the renewal of the spiritual life of the believer, while the aspect of an all-embracing transformation that includes the physical dimension was left behind. 223
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
- Page 177 and 178: Van Ruler deliberately distinguishe
- Page 179 and 180: The significance of Van Ruler’s a
- Page 181 and 182: historical condition of this world,
- Page 183 and 184: disabilities that they suffer, they
- Page 185 and 186: the verb. The implication is that h
- Page 187 and 188: The focus in Welker’s pneumatolog
- Page 189 and 190: the power of sin by the forgiveness
- Page 191 and 192: (becoming whole) and integrated thr
- Page 193 and 194: eorientation of Christian theology.
- Page 195 and 196: pattern of the confession — is cl
- Page 197 and 198: salvation). Questions/answers 65-82
- Page 199 and 200: (Shults 2008:271-287). The understa
- Page 201 and 202: heart. Calvin in particular was ver
- Page 203 and 204: the transformation of the believer
- Page 205 and 206: and as such dependent on God who ha
- Page 207 and 208: that healing is located outside the
- Page 209 and 210: Hollingsworth 2008). The broad conc
- Page 211 and 212: not be disappointed: God’s love w
- Page 213 and 214: justice, liberation and the affirma
- Page 215 and 216: elationships among the Trinitarian
- Page 217 and 218: constitute an important element of
- Page 219 and 220: lost. She was caught in a vicious c
- Page 221: CHAPTER 8. THE SPIRIT AND TRANSFORM
- Page 225 and 226: 8.2.3 Spirit of adoption James Dunn
- Page 227 and 228: 8.2.4 Physicality and transformatio
- Page 229 and 230: Metaphorical language about transfo
- Page 231 and 232: Reformed thought on the theme of tr
- Page 233 and 234: that God’s plan of salvation tran
- Page 235 and 236: gift into a gift that is beneficial
- Page 237 and 238: considered a tentative condition in
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 9. THE SPIRIT AND QUALITY O
- Page 241 and 242: physical abilities, social circumst
- Page 243 and 244: The clear distinction between the C
- Page 245 and 246: Conradie 54 shows, based on Van Rul
- Page 247 and 248: could say that people’s bodies ma
- Page 249 and 250: 9.3.1 Vulnerability, creation and S
- Page 251 and 252: in the cosmos, Polkinghorne (2006:1
- Page 253 and 254: ody, and thus his or her vulnerabil
- Page 255 and 256: the Holy Spirit. Moreover, this foc
- Page 257 and 258: The acceptance of her vulnerability
- Page 259 and 260: CHAPTER 10. THE SPIRIT AND POWER Th
- Page 261 and 262: oom for creation and for the embodi
- Page 263 and 264: Migliore (2008) has the same opinio
- Page 265 and 266: 10.2 POWER AND THE HOLY SPIRIT Chri
- Page 267 and 268: which the Spirit of God brings new
- Page 269 and 270: life through this discontinuity:
- Page 271 and 272: interpersonal relations. Everyone s
The centrality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>in</strong> missionary medic<strong>in</strong>e discourse has its<br />
background <strong>in</strong> Reformed thought on conversion <strong>and</strong> transformation. In Reformed thought,<br />
transformation is conceptualized as <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> reorientation <strong>of</strong> life, after <strong>the</strong> believer has<br />
accepted what Christ has done for <strong>the</strong> salvation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer. This transformation is a gradual<br />
process <strong>of</strong> change that is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> union with Christ, follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conversion to <strong>the</strong> triune<br />
God. The role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit is perceived as crucial <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> transformation.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> exploration <strong>of</strong> new avenues for express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k between Spirit <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, <strong>the</strong><br />
centrality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> motif <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>in</strong> missionary medic<strong>in</strong>e discourse evokes certa<strong>in</strong><br />
questions that will be addressed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. These question are: what exactly is meant with<br />
‘transformation’ <strong>in</strong> Reformed pneumatological discourse? To what extent do Reformed<br />
pneumatological perceptions <strong>of</strong> transformation provide space for categories <strong>of</strong> physicality <strong>and</strong><br />
materiality? Or is it <strong>in</strong> Reformed pneumatology only possible to speak <strong>of</strong> transformation <strong>in</strong><br />
metaphorical language?<br />
8.2 TRANSFORMATION IN REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGY<br />
Reformed underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer starts with God’s history <strong>of</strong><br />
redemption. In l<strong>in</strong>e with biblical testimony, <strong>the</strong> emphasis is on God’s sav<strong>in</strong>g work. The <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong><br />
God’s salvation is central <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Scriptures, where we witness what God has done for us, with<br />
Christ’s suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> resurrection as <strong>the</strong> climax. The biblical breadth <strong>of</strong> salvation implies that<br />
salvation (salus as health <strong>and</strong> wholeness) is not only to be understood <strong>in</strong> personal terms but also<br />
<strong>in</strong> cosmic terms: God’s desire for wholeness <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> transformation <strong>of</strong> humans <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
relationship with God <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r persons, as well as <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> creation (Plant<strong>in</strong>ga<br />
2010:313-320).<br />
8.2.1 Justification <strong>and</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual transformation<br />
In classic Protestant <strong>the</strong>ology, <strong>the</strong> moment <strong>of</strong> justification became a central tenet <strong>of</strong> salvation,<br />
because it emphasized God’s <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> salvation <strong>of</strong> mank<strong>in</strong>d. Lu<strong>the</strong>r’s rediscovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Paul<strong>in</strong>e notion <strong>of</strong> justification by faith was a retrieval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> idea that only God is <strong>the</strong> One who<br />
graciously saves, <strong>and</strong> who can make a s<strong>in</strong>ner righteous; <strong>the</strong> believer him- or herself is not able to<br />
contribute to his or her salvation by works or o<strong>the</strong>r merits, let alone achieve it. No one is able to<br />
justify oneself before God. The doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> justification received a normative status (Dunn<br />
1998:332), <strong>and</strong> came to play a crucial role <strong>in</strong> Reformed underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> salvation. McGrath<br />
(2005:1f) describes <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> justification for Protestant <strong>the</strong>ology as<br />
follows: “<strong>the</strong> Christian doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> justification (…) constitutes <strong>the</strong> real centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological<br />
222