spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
elationship rather than a state 45 , because shalom refers to material and physical well-being within a social context. Joseph Savage (2001) states in his research on the relation between shalom and health/healing that healing is an accepted term for denoting the restoration of shalom. The inclusion of human life in God’s shalom, or wholeness, means that a person is being restored in the sense that he or she receives a renewed identity, a revived spirit, and a regenerated body because the human being partakes in the mystery of the communion of the Father, the Son, and the Spirit (Van der Kooi 2006:240). It is about the restoration of all dimensions that belong to God-given life. In this light the connection between healing (becoming whole) and salvation (as wholeness of God) can be mentioned. Though healing and salvation cannot be connected in a direct line, in etymological terms ‘whole’, ‘heal’ and ‘holy’ belong to the same semantic group. The Latin terminology of sanus (healthy) and sanctus (holy) share the same root, so that both sanctification (as in salvation) and healing have to do with the materialization of wholeness (cf. Moltmann 1992:175; Veenhof 2005:269). Health, then, can be considered as a physical, environmental, psychological, social, moral and spiritual concept, that indicates that the shalom or health that is communicated by the Spirit is to be understood as a wide soteriological concept. Eisenbeis (1966) stresses that shalom describes a particular aspect of the relationship with God, which makes shalom to become closely related to salvation. It must be emphasized that this soteriological meaning of health does not focus on whether and how healing exists, but it draws the attention to the One to whom health is ascribed (Conradie 2006:19), and this focus on God can be attributed to the life-giving and relation-fostering work of the Holy Spirit. 7.3 THE HOLY SPIRIT AND HEALTH In the preceding section it is pointed out that the Holy Spirit can be characterized as the bond of mutual love between the Father and the Son. The person of the Spirit is identified as the One who constitutes and seeks relationality. The Spirit of God does not only embrace the This way, shalom denotes active rejection of all forms of injustice (political, economic, social, psychological, physical, individual, and communal). A final crucial notion of the biblical concept of shalom is in line with shalom as relational category, namely that shalom is always manifested externally (cf. Von Rad 1977:402-406). In the Old Testament shalom is never explicitly related to inward peace, but shalom turns out to be a movement to the exterior, to the other. It means that God’s shalom needs concrete everyday life; women, man, land, animals, and vegetation constitute the interwoveness of life, and therefore they can become expressions of God’s shalom. 45. Unlike Von Rad, Westermann (1969:144-177) is of the opinion that shalom, as wholeness and well-being, should be considered as a state rather than a relationship. Gerleman (1971:919-935) concludes that shalom can best be understood as both a state and a relationship. 214
elationships among the Trinitarian persons, but She also establishes relationality between God and creation. The ecstatic Spirit reaches out and shares God’s abundance, generosity, shalom, wholeness and healing with creaturely life. The implication of this divine self-giving is that God’s relational life touches human life in existential and concrete ways, which includes shalom, health and wholeness. Based on the understanding of the Holy Spirit as the bond of love who shares God’s relationality with creation, it is argued in the following paragraphs that theological articulations of health and healing are to be located in the field of the Spirit who seeks and establishes relationality. 7.3.1 Embedded in God’s relational life The relation between Spirit, relationality and health is rooted in the idea that the ecstatic Spirit communicates God’s life through imparting the breath of life. The Priestly account of the creation story (Genesis 1) offers one of the early biblical conceptions of the Spirit: the Spirit is the ruach Elohim, the breath or the wind of God, hovering over the waters. At the end of the chapter the breath (nepesh) of life is mentioned again, this time in relation to all living beings. The Yahwist account of the creation story (Genesis 2) adds that the Lord breathed the breath of life specifically into the creature (Yong 2006:191). In the Old Testament, ruach is used to refer to the breath that gives life (cf. Genesis 6:17 and Ezekiel 37:5). This biblical notion of Spirit and life implies several things. First of all, it means that the breath of all living beings belongs to God (Kärkkäinen 2002:24). God has breathed into materiality, making it alive. The vitality, breathed into creaturely life, comes from God and returns to God. In other words, the mystery of life is the breath of God in all of creation. This also implies that God is the source of life, empowering creation and giving breath to people (Isaiah 42:5). This association of Spirit as the life-giving principle transpires, for example, in the book of Psalms 104:29-30 (‘When you hide your face, they are terrified; when you take away their breath, they die and return to dust. When you send your Spirit, they are created, and you renew the face of the earth’) and in Job 34:14-15 (‘If it were his intention and he withdrew his Spirit and breath, all mankind would perish together and man would return to dust’). Another implication of the identification of the Spirit with the breath of life is that life itself is a gift from God (Kärkkäinen 2002:24). With the gift of life, God creates relationality, because the Spirit places human life in a relationship with God himself. It is a gift that flourishes in relationships, because those, who are filled with the Spirit, become part of a complex and lively fellowship with God and with one another. To be alive means existing in a vital pattern of relationships. As Welker (1994:160) says, “God’s Spirit enlivens, is creatively and life-givingly effective, inasmuch as the Spirit produces this intimate, complex, and indissoluble interconnection of individual and common life”. The Old Testament notion of Spirit and life also draws attention to the quality of life. All living creatures, having been gifted with 215
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
- Page 177 and 178: Van Ruler deliberately distinguishe
- Page 179 and 180: The significance of Van Ruler’s a
- Page 181 and 182: historical condition of this world,
- Page 183 and 184: disabilities that they suffer, they
- Page 185 and 186: the verb. The implication is that h
- Page 187 and 188: The focus in Welker’s pneumatolog
- Page 189 and 190: the power of sin by the forgiveness
- Page 191 and 192: (becoming whole) and integrated thr
- Page 193 and 194: eorientation of Christian theology.
- Page 195 and 196: pattern of the confession — is cl
- Page 197 and 198: salvation). Questions/answers 65-82
- Page 199 and 200: (Shults 2008:271-287). The understa
- Page 201 and 202: heart. Calvin in particular was ver
- Page 203 and 204: the transformation of the believer
- Page 205 and 206: and as such dependent on God who ha
- Page 207 and 208: that healing is located outside the
- Page 209 and 210: Hollingsworth 2008). The broad conc
- Page 211 and 212: not be disappointed: God’s love w
- Page 213: justice, liberation and the affirma
- Page 217 and 218: constitute an important element of
- Page 219 and 220: lost. She was caught in a vicious c
- Page 221 and 222: CHAPTER 8. THE SPIRIT AND TRANSFORM
- Page 223 and 224: system of the Christian church (…
- Page 225 and 226: 8.2.3 Spirit of adoption James Dunn
- Page 227 and 228: 8.2.4 Physicality and transformatio
- Page 229 and 230: Metaphorical language about transfo
- Page 231 and 232: Reformed thought on the theme of tr
- Page 233 and 234: that God’s plan of salvation tran
- Page 235 and 236: gift into a gift that is beneficial
- Page 237 and 238: considered a tentative condition in
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 9. THE SPIRIT AND QUALITY O
- Page 241 and 242: physical abilities, social circumst
- Page 243 and 244: The clear distinction between the C
- Page 245 and 246: Conradie 54 shows, based on Van Rul
- Page 247 and 248: could say that people’s bodies ma
- Page 249 and 250: 9.3.1 Vulnerability, creation and S
- Page 251 and 252: in the cosmos, Polkinghorne (2006:1
- Page 253 and 254: ody, and thus his or her vulnerabil
- Page 255 and 256: the Holy Spirit. Moreover, this foc
- Page 257 and 258: The acceptance of her vulnerability
- Page 259 and 260: CHAPTER 10. THE SPIRIT AND POWER Th
- Page 261 and 262: oom for creation and for the embodi
- Page 263 and 264: Migliore (2008) has the same opinio
elationship ra<strong>the</strong>r than a state 45 , because shalom refers to material <strong>and</strong> physical well-be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a social context. Joseph Savage (2001) states <strong>in</strong> his research on <strong>the</strong> relation between<br />
shalom <strong>and</strong> health/<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> that <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is an accepted term for denot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong><br />
shalom.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> human life <strong>in</strong> God’s shalom, or wholeness, means that a person is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
restored <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that he or she receives a renewed identity, a revived <strong>spirit</strong>, <strong>and</strong> a regenerated<br />
body because <strong>the</strong> human be<strong>in</strong>g partakes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mystery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> communion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Son,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit (Van der Kooi 2006:240). It is about <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> all dimensions that belong<br />
to God-given life. In this light <strong>the</strong> connection between <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (becom<strong>in</strong>g whole) <strong>and</strong> salvation<br />
(as wholeness <strong>of</strong> God) can be mentioned. Though <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> salvation cannot be connected <strong>in</strong> a<br />
direct l<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong> etymological terms ‘whole’, ‘heal’ <strong>and</strong> ‘holy’ belong to <strong>the</strong> same semantic group.<br />
The Lat<strong>in</strong> term<strong>in</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> sanus (healthy) <strong>and</strong> sanctus (holy) share <strong>the</strong> same root, so that both<br />
sanctification (as <strong>in</strong> salvation) <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> have to do with <strong>the</strong> materialization <strong>of</strong> wholeness (cf.<br />
Moltmann 1992:175; Veenh<strong>of</strong> 2005:269). Health, <strong>the</strong>n, can be considered as a physical,<br />
environmental, psychological, social, moral <strong>and</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual concept, that <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> shalom<br />
or health that is communicated by <strong>the</strong> Spirit is to be understood as a wide soteriological concept.<br />
Eisenbeis (1966) stresses that shalom describes a particular aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship with God,<br />
which makes shalom to become closely related to salvation. It must be emphasized that this<br />
soteriological mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> health does not focus on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> how <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> exists, but it draws<br />
<strong>the</strong> attention to <strong>the</strong> One to whom health is ascribed (Conradie 2006:19), <strong>and</strong> this focus on God<br />
can be attributed to <strong>the</strong> life-giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> relation-foster<strong>in</strong>g work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit.<br />
7.3 THE HOLY SPIRIT AND HEALTH<br />
In <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section it is po<strong>in</strong>ted out that <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit can be characterized as <strong>the</strong> bond <strong>of</strong><br />
mutual love between <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son. The person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is identified as <strong>the</strong> One<br />
who constitutes <strong>and</strong> seeks relationality. The Spirit <strong>of</strong> God does not only embrace <strong>the</strong><br />
This way, shalom denotes active rejection <strong>of</strong> all forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>justice (political, economic, social, psychological,<br />
physical, <strong>in</strong>dividual, <strong>and</strong> communal). A f<strong>in</strong>al crucial notion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biblical concept <strong>of</strong> shalom is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with shalom<br />
as relational category, namely that shalom is always manifested externally (cf. Von Rad 1977:402-406). In <strong>the</strong> Old<br />
Testament shalom is never explicitly related to <strong>in</strong>ward peace, but shalom turns out to be a movement to <strong>the</strong> exterior,<br />
to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. It means that God’s shalom needs concrete everyday life; women, man, l<strong>and</strong>, animals, <strong>and</strong> vegetation<br />
constitute <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terwoveness <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y can become expressions <strong>of</strong> God’s shalom.<br />
45. Unlike Von Rad, Westermann (1969:144-177) is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ion that shalom, as wholeness <strong>and</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
should be considered as a state ra<strong>the</strong>r than a relationship. Gerleman (1971:919-935) concludes that shalom can best<br />
be understood as both a state <strong>and</strong> a relationship.<br />
214