spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

Recently Augustine’s theology has given rise to renewed scholarship. Theologians like Lewis Ayres (1996, 2000, 2010), Michel Barnes (1995, 1999, 2003), and Rowan Williams (1990) set the trend to re-read Augustine’s Trinitarian theology in order to retrieve essential notions that have been neglected under the influence of the negative reception of Augustine’s theology. The new readings respond to and overturn the idea that Augustine’s Trinitarian theology is the initiator of disastrous trends in Western Christian thought (Ayres 2010:1). This re-reading is referred to as the ‘new canon’ of Augustine scholarship, and it contributes to the understanding of contemporary scholarship that Augustine’s theology has been interpreted primarily through a non-theological lens and with a focus on his Neo-platonic engagements. Countering the older and disapproving receptions of Augustine’s Trinitarian theology, the new readings show, for example, that Augustine moves towards an account of the divine communion on the basis of the threeness of the Trinity (Ayres 2010:3, 263-272). In his work On the Holy Trinity, Augustine addresses the person of the Holy Spirit in relation to the other persons within the Godhead 42 . He understands the person of the Holy Spirit within Trinitarian life as “a certain unutterable communion of the Father and the Son; and on that account, perhaps, He is so called, because the same name is suitable to both the Father and the Son” (5.11.12). The Holy Spirit is identified as communion or fellowship between the Father and the Son, which means that the Father and the Son can be characterized as communion as well: God is communion (Ayres 2010:251). Taking this a stage further, Augustine re-emphasizes that the Spirit is equal to the Father and the Son in all things, and he starts to define this communion as love: “the Holy Spirit, whatever it is, is something common both to the Father and Son. But that communion itself is consubstantial and co-eternal; and if it may fitly be called friendship, let it be so called; but it is more aptly called love” (On the Holy Trinity 6.5.7). This identification of the Spirit as love does not only explain the person of the Spirit within the Trinity as the One who is the love that bonds the Father and the Son; it also emphasizes the understanding of God as being in communion, loving and sharing with one another (Ayres 2010:258). On the basis of 1 John 4:8-16, Augustine argues that God is love, and that the Holy Spirit is the love that the Father and the Son share, because it is only through the Spirit that God’s love can be experienced. God’s nature is love, and the identity of the Spirit can be found in this loving relationality of the Trinitarian persons. Augustine also uses Romans 5:5 to substantiate the identification of the Spirit as the mutual love between the Father and the Son. Paul encourages believers to persevere in their suffering, because it will produce hope that will 42. Full text available on http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.html (accessed on 2 November 2011). 210

not be disappointed: God’s love will be poured out in the hearts of the believers. Augustine contends that it is the Spirit who will be poured out, because when God pours out his love, He shares nothing other than Himself, and this is done through the Spirit who is the mutual love of the Father and the Son (cf. Umstattd 2008:29). Within the Trinity, the Spirit is characterized as the One who is the principle of divine communion and unity. This implies that the Spirit, as bond or embrace of the inner-Trinitarian love, is the provider of love and communion. The Spirit is not only the mediator of relationship or the gift proceeding from the Father and the Son, but the bonding Spirit also gives communion to the Father and the Son. Eugene Rogers Jr. (2005:67) contends that “it is this received unity, the koinonia or communion of the Holy Spirit, that renders the life of the Trinity dynamic and allows for the inclusion of others within that life without distortion” (italics original). In embracing the Father and the Son, the relationship-oriented Spirit always creates possibilities for inviting creation in that embrace and communion of love. Calvin, following Augustine, also refers to the Spirit as the bond of love, who places human life in relation with God’s love: “the Holy Spirit is the bond by which Christ effectually unites us to himself” (Inst. 3.1.1). 7.2.2 Ecstatic spirit There is a general consensus to conceive the Trinitarian God as ‘ecstatic’ on the basis of this movement towards creation. The Greek theologian John Zizioulas developed the concept of ekstasis in his relational Trinitarian theology as described in his magnum opus ‘Being as Communion’ (1985). The basic thrust of his approach is that true existence is constituted in communion (Kärkkäinen 2007:90). It is not possible to truly exist without moving beyond theindividual’ self-existence. In other words, to be a true person and to be able to live in freedom necessitates living in relationships, in communion. Zizioulas views this communal ontology of personhood as an avenue to naming the mystery of the Triune God. The main building block of Zizoulas’ communal ontology of personhood is provided by the Cappadocian Fathers, who, on the basis of the relation between hypostasis and prosōpon 43 , stated that ‘person’ implied that relationality is a constitutive element of being; a human being cannot be a ‘person’ if he or she does not exist relationally. Zizoulas retrieved this Cappadocian innovation of personhood, and placed it in the frame of communion. In doing so, he turned the 43. The Greek word prosōpon refers to the mask, used by Greek actors in theatrical plays. In theological terms, prosōpon carries the meaning of ‘person’ in the sense that one’s personhood was an addition of unique attributes to one’s essential human nature — as was the mask to the actor (see Grenz 2004:138). 211

Recently August<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>the</strong>ology has given rise to renewed scholarship. Theologians like Lewis<br />

Ayres (1996, 2000, 2010), Michel Barnes (1995, 1999, 2003), <strong>and</strong> Rowan Williams (1990) set<br />

<strong>the</strong> trend to re-read August<strong>in</strong>e’s Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> order to retrieve essential notions that<br />

have been neglected under <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> negative reception <strong>of</strong> August<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>the</strong>ology. The<br />

new read<strong>in</strong>gs respond to <strong>and</strong> overturn <strong>the</strong> idea that August<strong>in</strong>e’s Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian <strong>the</strong>ology is <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>itiator <strong>of</strong> disastrous trends <strong>in</strong> Western Christian thought (Ayres 2010:1). This re-read<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

referred to as <strong>the</strong> ‘new canon’ <strong>of</strong> August<strong>in</strong>e scholarship, <strong>and</strong> it contributes to <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> contemporary scholarship that August<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>the</strong>ology has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted primarily through a<br />

non-<strong>the</strong>ological lens <strong>and</strong> with a focus on his Neo-platonic engagements. Counter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> older<br />

<strong>and</strong> disapprov<strong>in</strong>g receptions <strong>of</strong> August<strong>in</strong>e’s Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian <strong>the</strong>ology, <strong>the</strong> new read<strong>in</strong>gs show, for<br />

example, that August<strong>in</strong>e moves towards an account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e communion on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

threeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>ity (Ayres 2010:3, 263-272).<br />

In his work On <strong>the</strong> Holy Tr<strong>in</strong>ity, August<strong>in</strong>e addresses <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r persons with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Godhead 42 . He underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit with<strong>in</strong><br />

Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian life as “a certa<strong>in</strong> unutterable communion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son; <strong>and</strong> on that<br />

account, perhaps, He is so called, because <strong>the</strong> same name is suitable to both <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Son” (5.11.12). The Holy Spirit is identified as communion or fellowship between <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Son, which means that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son can be characterized as communion as well:<br />

God is communion (Ayres 2010:251). Tak<strong>in</strong>g this a stage fur<strong>the</strong>r, August<strong>in</strong>e re-emphasizes that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Spirit is equal to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>in</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> he starts to def<strong>in</strong>e this communion<br />

as love: “<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, whatever it is, is someth<strong>in</strong>g common both to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Son. But<br />

that communion itself is consubstantial <strong>and</strong> co-eternal; <strong>and</strong> if it may fitly be called friendship, let<br />

it be so called; but it is more aptly called love” (On <strong>the</strong> Holy Tr<strong>in</strong>ity 6.5.7).<br />

This identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit as love does not only expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Tr<strong>in</strong>ity as <strong>the</strong> One who is <strong>the</strong> love that bonds <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son; it also emphasizes <strong>the</strong><br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> God as be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> communion, lov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g with one ano<strong>the</strong>r (Ayres<br />

2010:258). On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> 1 John 4:8-16, August<strong>in</strong>e argues that God is love, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> Holy<br />

Spirit is <strong>the</strong> love that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son share, because it is only through <strong>the</strong> Spirit that<br />

God’s love can be experienced. God’s nature is love, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit can be found<br />

<strong>in</strong> this lov<strong>in</strong>g relationality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian persons. August<strong>in</strong>e also uses Romans 5:5 to<br />

substantiate <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit as <strong>the</strong> mutual love between <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son.<br />

Paul encourages believers to persevere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir suffer<strong>in</strong>g, because it will produce hope that will<br />

42. Full text available on http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.html (accessed on 2 November 2011).<br />

210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!