spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
Recently Augustine’s theology has given rise to renewed scholarship. Theologians like Lewis Ayres (1996, 2000, 2010), Michel Barnes (1995, 1999, 2003), and Rowan Williams (1990) set the trend to re-read Augustine’s Trinitarian theology in order to retrieve essential notions that have been neglected under the influence of the negative reception of Augustine’s theology. The new readings respond to and overturn the idea that Augustine’s Trinitarian theology is the initiator of disastrous trends in Western Christian thought (Ayres 2010:1). This re-reading is referred to as the ‘new canon’ of Augustine scholarship, and it contributes to the understanding of contemporary scholarship that Augustine’s theology has been interpreted primarily through a non-theological lens and with a focus on his Neo-platonic engagements. Countering the older and disapproving receptions of Augustine’s Trinitarian theology, the new readings show, for example, that Augustine moves towards an account of the divine communion on the basis of the threeness of the Trinity (Ayres 2010:3, 263-272). In his work On the Holy Trinity, Augustine addresses the person of the Holy Spirit in relation to the other persons within the Godhead 42 . He understands the person of the Holy Spirit within Trinitarian life as “a certain unutterable communion of the Father and the Son; and on that account, perhaps, He is so called, because the same name is suitable to both the Father and the Son” (5.11.12). The Holy Spirit is identified as communion or fellowship between the Father and the Son, which means that the Father and the Son can be characterized as communion as well: God is communion (Ayres 2010:251). Taking this a stage further, Augustine re-emphasizes that the Spirit is equal to the Father and the Son in all things, and he starts to define this communion as love: “the Holy Spirit, whatever it is, is something common both to the Father and Son. But that communion itself is consubstantial and co-eternal; and if it may fitly be called friendship, let it be so called; but it is more aptly called love” (On the Holy Trinity 6.5.7). This identification of the Spirit as love does not only explain the person of the Spirit within the Trinity as the One who is the love that bonds the Father and the Son; it also emphasizes the understanding of God as being in communion, loving and sharing with one another (Ayres 2010:258). On the basis of 1 John 4:8-16, Augustine argues that God is love, and that the Holy Spirit is the love that the Father and the Son share, because it is only through the Spirit that God’s love can be experienced. God’s nature is love, and the identity of the Spirit can be found in this loving relationality of the Trinitarian persons. Augustine also uses Romans 5:5 to substantiate the identification of the Spirit as the mutual love between the Father and the Son. Paul encourages believers to persevere in their suffering, because it will produce hope that will 42. Full text available on http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.html (accessed on 2 November 2011). 210
not be disappointed: God’s love will be poured out in the hearts of the believers. Augustine contends that it is the Spirit who will be poured out, because when God pours out his love, He shares nothing other than Himself, and this is done through the Spirit who is the mutual love of the Father and the Son (cf. Umstattd 2008:29). Within the Trinity, the Spirit is characterized as the One who is the principle of divine communion and unity. This implies that the Spirit, as bond or embrace of the inner-Trinitarian love, is the provider of love and communion. The Spirit is not only the mediator of relationship or the gift proceeding from the Father and the Son, but the bonding Spirit also gives communion to the Father and the Son. Eugene Rogers Jr. (2005:67) contends that “it is this received unity, the koinonia or communion of the Holy Spirit, that renders the life of the Trinity dynamic and allows for the inclusion of others within that life without distortion” (italics original). In embracing the Father and the Son, the relationship-oriented Spirit always creates possibilities for inviting creation in that embrace and communion of love. Calvin, following Augustine, also refers to the Spirit as the bond of love, who places human life in relation with God’s love: “the Holy Spirit is the bond by which Christ effectually unites us to himself” (Inst. 3.1.1). 7.2.2 Ecstatic spirit There is a general consensus to conceive the Trinitarian God as ‘ecstatic’ on the basis of this movement towards creation. The Greek theologian John Zizioulas developed the concept of ekstasis in his relational Trinitarian theology as described in his magnum opus ‘Being as Communion’ (1985). The basic thrust of his approach is that true existence is constituted in communion (Kärkkäinen 2007:90). It is not possible to truly exist without moving beyond the ‘individual’ self-existence. In other words, to be a true person and to be able to live in freedom necessitates living in relationships, in communion. Zizioulas views this communal ontology of personhood as an avenue to naming the mystery of the Triune God. The main building block of Zizoulas’ communal ontology of personhood is provided by the Cappadocian Fathers, who, on the basis of the relation between hypostasis and prosōpon 43 , stated that ‘person’ implied that relationality is a constitutive element of being; a human being cannot be a ‘person’ if he or she does not exist relationally. Zizoulas retrieved this Cappadocian innovation of personhood, and placed it in the frame of communion. In doing so, he turned the 43. The Greek word prosōpon refers to the mask, used by Greek actors in theatrical plays. In theological terms, prosōpon carries the meaning of ‘person’ in the sense that one’s personhood was an addition of unique attributes to one’s essential human nature — as was the mask to the actor (see Grenz 2004:138). 211
- Page 159 and 160: Another feature of Calvin’s pneum
- Page 161 and 162: providence allows for a limited yet
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
- Page 177 and 178: Van Ruler deliberately distinguishe
- Page 179 and 180: The significance of Van Ruler’s a
- Page 181 and 182: historical condition of this world,
- Page 183 and 184: disabilities that they suffer, they
- Page 185 and 186: the verb. The implication is that h
- Page 187 and 188: The focus in Welker’s pneumatolog
- Page 189 and 190: the power of sin by the forgiveness
- Page 191 and 192: (becoming whole) and integrated thr
- Page 193 and 194: eorientation of Christian theology.
- Page 195 and 196: pattern of the confession — is cl
- Page 197 and 198: salvation). Questions/answers 65-82
- Page 199 and 200: (Shults 2008:271-287). The understa
- Page 201 and 202: heart. Calvin in particular was ver
- Page 203 and 204: the transformation of the believer
- Page 205 and 206: and as such dependent on God who ha
- Page 207 and 208: that healing is located outside the
- Page 209: Hollingsworth 2008). The broad conc
- Page 213 and 214: justice, liberation and the affirma
- Page 215 and 216: elationships among the Trinitarian
- Page 217 and 218: constitute an important element of
- Page 219 and 220: lost. She was caught in a vicious c
- Page 221 and 222: CHAPTER 8. THE SPIRIT AND TRANSFORM
- Page 223 and 224: system of the Christian church (…
- Page 225 and 226: 8.2.3 Spirit of adoption James Dunn
- Page 227 and 228: 8.2.4 Physicality and transformatio
- Page 229 and 230: Metaphorical language about transfo
- Page 231 and 232: Reformed thought on the theme of tr
- Page 233 and 234: that God’s plan of salvation tran
- Page 235 and 236: gift into a gift that is beneficial
- Page 237 and 238: considered a tentative condition in
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 9. THE SPIRIT AND QUALITY O
- Page 241 and 242: physical abilities, social circumst
- Page 243 and 244: The clear distinction between the C
- Page 245 and 246: Conradie 54 shows, based on Van Rul
- Page 247 and 248: could say that people’s bodies ma
- Page 249 and 250: 9.3.1 Vulnerability, creation and S
- Page 251 and 252: in the cosmos, Polkinghorne (2006:1
- Page 253 and 254: ody, and thus his or her vulnerabil
- Page 255 and 256: the Holy Spirit. Moreover, this foc
- Page 257 and 258: The acceptance of her vulnerability
- Page 259 and 260: CHAPTER 10. THE SPIRIT AND POWER Th
Recently August<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>the</strong>ology has given rise to renewed scholarship. Theologians like Lewis<br />
Ayres (1996, 2000, 2010), Michel Barnes (1995, 1999, 2003), <strong>and</strong> Rowan Williams (1990) set<br />
<strong>the</strong> trend to re-read August<strong>in</strong>e’s Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> order to retrieve essential notions that<br />
have been neglected under <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> negative reception <strong>of</strong> August<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>the</strong>ology. The<br />
new read<strong>in</strong>gs respond to <strong>and</strong> overturn <strong>the</strong> idea that August<strong>in</strong>e’s Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian <strong>the</strong>ology is <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>itiator <strong>of</strong> disastrous trends <strong>in</strong> Western Christian thought (Ayres 2010:1). This re-read<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
referred to as <strong>the</strong> ‘new canon’ <strong>of</strong> August<strong>in</strong>e scholarship, <strong>and</strong> it contributes to <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong> contemporary scholarship that August<strong>in</strong>e’s <strong>the</strong>ology has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted primarily through a<br />
non-<strong>the</strong>ological lens <strong>and</strong> with a focus on his Neo-platonic engagements. Counter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> older<br />
<strong>and</strong> disapprov<strong>in</strong>g receptions <strong>of</strong> August<strong>in</strong>e’s Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian <strong>the</strong>ology, <strong>the</strong> new read<strong>in</strong>gs show, for<br />
example, that August<strong>in</strong>e moves towards an account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e communion on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
threeness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>ity (Ayres 2010:3, 263-272).<br />
In his work On <strong>the</strong> Holy Tr<strong>in</strong>ity, August<strong>in</strong>e addresses <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong> relation to<br />
<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r persons with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Godhead 42 . He underst<strong>and</strong>s <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit with<strong>in</strong><br />
Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian life as “a certa<strong>in</strong> unutterable communion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son; <strong>and</strong> on that<br />
account, perhaps, He is so called, because <strong>the</strong> same name is suitable to both <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Son” (5.11.12). The Holy Spirit is identified as communion or fellowship between <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Son, which means that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son can be characterized as communion as well:<br />
God is communion (Ayres 2010:251). Tak<strong>in</strong>g this a stage fur<strong>the</strong>r, August<strong>in</strong>e re-emphasizes that<br />
<strong>the</strong> Spirit is equal to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>in</strong> all th<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> he starts to def<strong>in</strong>e this communion<br />
as love: “<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, whatever it is, is someth<strong>in</strong>g common both to <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Son. But<br />
that communion itself is consubstantial <strong>and</strong> co-eternal; <strong>and</strong> if it may fitly be called friendship, let<br />
it be so called; but it is more aptly called love” (On <strong>the</strong> Holy Tr<strong>in</strong>ity 6.5.7).<br />
This identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit as love does not only expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Tr<strong>in</strong>ity as <strong>the</strong> One who is <strong>the</strong> love that bonds <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son; it also emphasizes <strong>the</strong><br />
underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> God as be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> communion, lov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> shar<strong>in</strong>g with one ano<strong>the</strong>r (Ayres<br />
2010:258). On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> 1 John 4:8-16, August<strong>in</strong>e argues that God is love, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> Holy<br />
Spirit is <strong>the</strong> love that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son share, because it is only through <strong>the</strong> Spirit that<br />
God’s love can be experienced. God’s nature is love, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit can be found<br />
<strong>in</strong> this lov<strong>in</strong>g relationality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian persons. August<strong>in</strong>e also uses Romans 5:5 to<br />
substantiate <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit as <strong>the</strong> mutual love between <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son.<br />
Paul encourages believers to persevere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir suffer<strong>in</strong>g, because it will produce hope that will<br />
42. Full text available on http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf103.html (accessed on 2 November 2011).<br />
210