spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The focus <strong>in</strong> Welker’s pneumatology is <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ways <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> Holy<br />
Spirit can be experienced. Welker wants to get a clearer view on <strong>the</strong> diverse testimonies to God<br />
<strong>the</strong> Spirit. These testimonies are his po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> exit, which makes Welker’s pneumatological<br />
approach a realistic <strong>and</strong> pluralistic <strong>the</strong>ology (Welker 1994:4649). It is realistic, because he does<br />
not attempt to <strong>of</strong>fer a comprehensive metaphysical model <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s work, but wants to beg<strong>in</strong><br />
with biblical <strong>and</strong> contemporary testimonies to <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. These testimonies are connected<br />
to each o<strong>the</strong>r, but <strong>the</strong>y can also be <strong>in</strong>compatible. Precisely <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>terconnections <strong>and</strong> differences<br />
contribute to a perspective that is sensitive to <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, ‘realistic’<br />
has to do with both <strong>the</strong> diversity <strong>in</strong> creaturely reality <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mystery <strong>of</strong> God’s reality. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to Welker, <strong>the</strong> weakness <strong>of</strong> most o<strong>the</strong>r pneumatologies is that <strong>the</strong>y do not make a dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />
between God’s reality <strong>and</strong> creation (between <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>and</strong> human <strong>spirit</strong>, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
natural pneumatologies), or address issues that are beyond this worldly life, ignor<strong>in</strong>g human<br />
experiences (result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> pneumatologies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beyond). A realistic pneumatology would avoid<br />
those two pitfalls. Consequently, Welker’s pneumatology is a pluralistic approach: <strong>the</strong> different<br />
patterns <strong>in</strong> human experiences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit refer to <strong>and</strong> require a sensitivity to <strong>the</strong> diversity (<strong>and</strong><br />
sometimes <strong>in</strong>congruity) <strong>of</strong> those collections <strong>of</strong> experiences. In contrast with pneumatological<br />
contributions <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ologians, Welker’s pneumatology is not a systematic approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, nor does it <strong>in</strong>clude metaphysics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, salvation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner-Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian<br />
relationships <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit. He basically maps <strong>the</strong> diverse human<br />
testimonies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit (as found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> biblical traditions) <strong>and</strong> identifies various patterns <strong>of</strong><br />
Spirit-experiences, which <strong>of</strong>fer knowledge about God.<br />
Welker’s concern is <strong>the</strong> modern <strong>and</strong> secular claim that God is absent <strong>in</strong> this reality, <strong>and</strong> he<br />
wishes to counter this claim. His presupposition is that <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit reveals <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> God (1994:2, 40). Knowledge about God, <strong>and</strong> about God’s creative power, makes<br />
us look towards <strong>the</strong> Spirit, who is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> creaturely reality. The early-biblical testimonies to<br />
<strong>the</strong> Spirit are still unclear (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong>y do not provide dist<strong>in</strong>ct references to <strong>the</strong> Holy<br />
Spirit) but a pattern can be identified: God’s Spirit is <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> deliverance. God’s Spirit wants<br />
to deliver, restore, renew, preserve <strong>and</strong> empower human be<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> early, <strong>and</strong> not fully crystallized, experiences <strong>and</strong> testimonies to <strong>the</strong> Spirit are those<br />
experiences that reveal God’s Spirit as a Spirit <strong>of</strong> justice <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> peace. Identify<strong>in</strong>g God’s Spirit<br />
as <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> justice is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major contributions <strong>of</strong> Welker’s pneumatology. He bases his<br />
approach on various messianic texts (Isa. 11:1ff; Isa. 42:1ff; Isa. 61:1ff), <strong>and</strong> shows how <strong>the</strong>se<br />
texts reveal <strong>the</strong> socio-political dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s action. The Spirit <strong>of</strong> God, who <strong>in</strong><br />
comparison with <strong>the</strong> earlier testimonies now rests on persons <strong>and</strong> endows <strong>the</strong>m (1994:109),<br />
187