23.06.2013 Views

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

affirmation <strong>of</strong> life, creat<strong>in</strong>g a strong anthropocentric emphasis <strong>in</strong> Moltmann’s approach to<br />

<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as a gift leads to <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as a charge (cf. 1992:174). Moltmann is very clear<br />

about his anthropocentric approach. However, <strong>the</strong> question rema<strong>in</strong>s: what k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, what<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> transformation does he have <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d? In addition, when Moltmann speaks about <strong>the</strong><br />

body <strong>and</strong> its transfiguration, <strong>the</strong>re is noticeable hesitance to set out clear l<strong>in</strong>es for <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong><br />

physicality <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. His <strong>the</strong>ological articulations on physical <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> focus ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

on wholeness <strong>and</strong> reverence for life. What is still miss<strong>in</strong>g, however, is an elaboration on <strong>the</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> call<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer with not only a transformed view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> self, but with a<br />

transfigured body. Moltmann translates God’s salvation <strong>in</strong>to an anthropocentric participation<br />

without clarify<strong>in</strong>g how God’s salvation is actualized <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer.<br />

In summary, it can be said that Moltmann’s <strong>the</strong>ological views on <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> constitute a refresh<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contribution to <strong>the</strong> reflection on <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> with<strong>in</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology, if only because he is one <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> few Reformed <strong>the</strong>ologians who made an effort to move beyond <strong>the</strong> Reformed embarrassment<br />

surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. However, it must be said that his perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as<br />

transfiguration <strong>and</strong> as charisma are not clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed. On <strong>the</strong> one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is someth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that has to do with a transformation with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer; on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is <strong>the</strong><br />

vocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer who has <strong>the</strong> responsibility to affirm life. How Moltmann views <strong>the</strong><br />

tangible transformation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer is not fully explicated <strong>in</strong> his approach. In addition, it is<br />

also not clear why Moltmann elaborates explicitly on <strong>the</strong> charisma <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, when all o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> life are also viewed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> service <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom already. What <strong>the</strong>n is <strong>the</strong> exact<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>? In a sense, Moltmann, as a representative <strong>of</strong> modern Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology,<br />

reveals a weak spot <strong>in</strong> Reformed thought about <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>: <strong>the</strong> relation between faith, <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> body.<br />

6.2.6 Michael Welker<br />

Michael Welker (1947) is ano<strong>the</strong>r German Reformed <strong>the</strong>ologian with an <strong>in</strong>ternational <strong>in</strong>fluence.<br />

His contributions address, among o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>the</strong>mes such as <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, creation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>and</strong> natural sciences. In his publication God <strong>the</strong> Spirit (1994),<br />

Welker presents a very dist<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>trigu<strong>in</strong>g approach to <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. As<br />

opposed to o<strong>the</strong>r pneumatological models, he prefers a postmodern frame <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

rediscover <strong>the</strong> powerful dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s presence <strong>in</strong> this world (1994:40). His dist<strong>in</strong>ctive<br />

approach is also reflected <strong>in</strong> some o<strong>the</strong>r contributions on pneumatology (see for example Welker<br />

1989:5-20; 2006b:221-232; 2007:236-248).<br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!