spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
The fourth difference is about the meaning of sacrifice. The theme of sacrifice is central in Christology, but it is difficult to trace in pneumatology. Taking a closer look at the work of the Spirit, however, will make one see that sacrifice and reconciliation can pneumatologically be found in the moments of fellowship in all dimensions of Christian life. The fifth difference addresses the once-and-for-all nature of Christ’s work which is distinctive from that of the Spirit. The Spirit’s outpouring can be seen as a decisive event, but the Spirit’s presence in creation is an ongoing reality. The sixth difference in the structures of Christology and pneumatology is that the Spirit inhabits creation, while this cannot be said about Christ. God dwells in human beings in the Spirit, but not in Christ. Van Ruler (Van Ruler 1947:185; see also Janssen 2005:74) understands the work of the Spirit as more broad-ranging and more inclusive than that of Christ, so that it can be said that the Spirit is the One who expands into the full plurality of the created order. In this sense, the difference between Christ and the Spirit is located in the notion of plurality, because plurality is at the heart of the Spirit’s work. In the Spirit, there are multiple ways and different manifestations of God’s salvation (2011 [1957a]:309). The seventh difference in the structures of Christology and pneumatology that Van Ruler identifies is that the inhabitation of the Spirit is a matter of conflict, stretching over the span of a person’s life-history. It is a struggle in which a person can resist, grieve and quench the work of the Holy Spirit. The eighth difference is that the work of the Spirit includes the mingling of the old and the new in a person’s life. The Spirit touches a person, and changes his or her existence. The implication is that something is happening: God’s grace is infused (gratia infusa) in the believer, and the believer receives the gifts of grace (charismata). This new dimension of divine grace in human life belongs to the work of the Spirit, and can never be related to the work of Christ, for it would be a heresy to suggest a mingling of God’s being and human nature (2011 [1961b]:379). The ninth, and final, difference is that within Christology the work of Christ can be characterized as complete and perfect, while this terminology cannot be included in pneumatology. The Spirit is at work, but creation is not yet perfected. The work of the Spirit should rather be characterized in terms of continuation. 178
The significance of Van Ruler’s approach to a relatively independent pneumatology is two-fold. In the first place, Van Ruler’s pneumatology emphasizes the full Trinitarian nature of Van Ruler’s theology. God is Trinitarian, because God reveals God’s self in Christ and in the Spirit in such a way that the work of the Spirit is not ‘absorbed’ by Christology. Secondly, the clear distinction between the Spirit and Christ emphasizes the importance of creation in Van Ruler’s theology. The work of the Spirit is to contribute to full creatureliness, that is the purpose of creation, whereby the Spirit enables the human to be human before God (Janssen 2005:77). Van der Kooi (2009:54f) concludes that Van Ruler’s relatively independent pneumatology is of great significance for a Christian perspective on culture and history, because it implies that God’s Spirit is at work in the present time, drawing God’s reign closer into our daily life. Van Ruler briefly mentions the gifts of the Spirit in his treatise on the work of the Holy Spirit (2011 [1957b]:351). He makes a distinction between particular, special gifts (such as healing, prophecy, and speaking in tongues) and the central gift of love. Van Ruler does not expand on the gift of healing, even though he says that the specific gifts of the Spirit should be taken seriously because these gifts reveal the excessive abundance of God (‘overstromende óvervloed’). He emphasizes that faith is also a gift of the Spirit, and elaborates on how the Spirit bends the will of a person by calling him or her in many different ways. This calling is the rebirth of the person, according to Van Ruler. In summary, Van Ruler’s pneumatology clearly differs from other Reformed approaches to the work of the Spirit. Refusing to go along with Barth’s Christocentric focus, Van Ruler identifies distinctive features of the Spirit’s efficacies. His model of differences in structure between the work of Christ and the work of the Spirit contributed to a Trinitarian balance. Van Ruler’s pneumatology is heavily defined by his positive view on creation. He believes that everything that the Spirit does, is aimed at the restoration of creation, so that creation will be even more beautiful than it was before. The final purpose of creation is theocracy, the indwelling of God in creation. This inhabitation is coming closer through the work of the Spirit, who approaches creation from this eschatological perspective. Van Ruler’s pneumatology implies that creation is an open, non-dualistic reality. 6.2.5 Jürgen Moltmann The Reformed theologian Jürgen Moltmann (1926) is widely characterized as one of the most productive and creative contemporary theologians (Meeks 1974:xiii; Bauckham 1987:1; Lorenzen 1996:304; Müller-Fahrenholz 2000:12; Wood 2000:5; Kärkkäinen 2002:125; Grenz 2004:73). Moltmann’s theology has guided many people into a new way of thinking, and he can 179
- Page 127 and 128: that the human covenant partner nee
- Page 129 and 130: approach towards the cause of disea
- Page 131 and 132: Besides the argument that Jesus him
- Page 133 and 134: malevolent forces or demons, who ha
- Page 135 and 136: of benevolent spiritual forces in o
- Page 137 and 138: 5.3.3 Power of the Holy Spirit With
- Page 139 and 140: for Jesus’ holistic approach to t
- Page 141 and 142: prophet-healer is seen as someone w
- Page 143 and 144: church-based healing discourse does
- Page 145 and 146: church-based healing would be depri
- Page 147 and 148: who have to deal with a changing st
- Page 149 and 150: manifests itself, but it is definit
- Page 151 and 152: PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUM
- Page 153 and 154: matrix? What are the essential elem
- Page 155 and 156: the work of the Spirit? What consti
- Page 157 and 158: 6.2 REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGIES The fol
- Page 159 and 160: Another feature of Calvin’s pneum
- Page 161 and 162: providence allows for a limited yet
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
- Page 177: Van Ruler deliberately distinguishe
- Page 181 and 182: historical condition of this world,
- Page 183 and 184: disabilities that they suffer, they
- Page 185 and 186: the verb. The implication is that h
- Page 187 and 188: The focus in Welker’s pneumatolog
- Page 189 and 190: the power of sin by the forgiveness
- Page 191 and 192: (becoming whole) and integrated thr
- Page 193 and 194: eorientation of Christian theology.
- Page 195 and 196: pattern of the confession — is cl
- Page 197 and 198: salvation). Questions/answers 65-82
- Page 199 and 200: (Shults 2008:271-287). The understa
- Page 201 and 202: heart. Calvin in particular was ver
- Page 203 and 204: the transformation of the believer
- Page 205 and 206: and as such dependent on God who ha
- Page 207 and 208: that healing is located outside the
- Page 209 and 210: Hollingsworth 2008). The broad conc
- Page 211 and 212: not be disappointed: God’s love w
- Page 213 and 214: justice, liberation and the affirma
- Page 215 and 216: elationships among the Trinitarian
- Page 217 and 218: constitute an important element of
- Page 219 and 220: lost. She was caught in a vicious c
- Page 221 and 222: CHAPTER 8. THE SPIRIT AND TRANSFORM
- Page 223 and 224: system of the Christian church (…
- Page 225 and 226: 8.2.3 Spirit of adoption James Dunn
- Page 227 and 228: 8.2.4 Physicality and transformatio
The significance <strong>of</strong> Van Ruler’s approach to a relatively <strong>in</strong>dependent pneumatology is two-fold.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> first place, Van Ruler’s pneumatology emphasizes <strong>the</strong> full Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian nature <strong>of</strong> Van<br />
Ruler’s <strong>the</strong>ology. God is Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian, because God reveals God’s self <strong>in</strong> Christ <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>in</strong><br />
such a way that <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is not ‘absorbed’ by Christology. Secondly, <strong>the</strong> clear<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>ction between <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>and</strong> Christ emphasizes <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>in</strong> Van Ruler’s<br />
<strong>the</strong>ology. The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is to contribute to full creaturel<strong>in</strong>ess, that is <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
creation, whereby <strong>the</strong> Spirit enables <strong>the</strong> human to be human before God (Janssen 2005:77). Van<br />
der Kooi (2009:54f) concludes that Van Ruler’s relatively <strong>in</strong>dependent pneumatology is <strong>of</strong> great<br />
significance for a Christian perspective on culture <strong>and</strong> history, because it implies that God’s<br />
Spirit is at work <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present time, draw<strong>in</strong>g God’s reign closer <strong>in</strong>to our daily life.<br />
Van Ruler briefly mentions <strong>the</strong> gifts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>in</strong> his treatise on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit<br />
(2011 [1957b]:351). He makes a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between particular, special gifts (such as <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>,<br />
prophecy, <strong>and</strong> speak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> tongues) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> central gift <strong>of</strong> love. Van Ruler does not exp<strong>and</strong> on<br />
<strong>the</strong> gift <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, even though he says that <strong>the</strong> specific gifts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit should be taken<br />
seriously because <strong>the</strong>se gifts reveal <strong>the</strong> excessive abundance <strong>of</strong> God (‘overstromende<br />
óvervloed’). He emphasizes that faith is also a gift <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, <strong>and</strong> elaborates on how <strong>the</strong> Spirit<br />
bends <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> a person by call<strong>in</strong>g him or her <strong>in</strong> many different ways. This call<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>the</strong><br />
rebirth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> person, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Van Ruler.<br />
In summary, Van Ruler’s pneumatology clearly differs from o<strong>the</strong>r Reformed approaches to <strong>the</strong><br />
work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit. Refus<strong>in</strong>g to go along with Barth’s Christocentric focus, Van Ruler identifies<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>ctive features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s efficacies. His model <strong>of</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> structure between <strong>the</strong><br />
work <strong>of</strong> Christ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit contributed to a Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian balance. Van Ruler’s<br />
pneumatology is heavily def<strong>in</strong>ed by his positive view on creation. He believes that everyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that <strong>the</strong> Spirit does, is aimed at <strong>the</strong> restoration <strong>of</strong> creation, so that creation will be even more<br />
beautiful than it was before. The f<strong>in</strong>al purpose <strong>of</strong> creation is <strong>the</strong>ocracy, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dwell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> God <strong>in</strong><br />
creation. This <strong>in</strong>habitation is com<strong>in</strong>g closer through <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, who approaches<br />
creation from this eschatological perspective. Van Ruler’s pneumatology implies that creation is<br />
an open, non-dualistic reality.<br />
6.2.5 Jürgen Moltmann<br />
The Reformed <strong>the</strong>ologian Jürgen Moltmann (1926) is widely characterized as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />
productive <strong>and</strong> creative contemporary <strong>the</strong>ologians (Meeks 1974:xiii; Bauckham 1987:1;<br />
Lorenzen 1996:304; Müller-Fahrenholz 2000:12; Wood 2000:5; Kärkkä<strong>in</strong>en 2002:125; Grenz<br />
2004:73). Moltmann’s <strong>the</strong>ology has guided many people <strong>in</strong>to a new way <strong>of</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> he can<br />
179