23.06.2013 Views

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

any room for dualism between heaven <strong>and</strong> earth, between material <strong>and</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual. The close<br />

connection between this world <strong>and</strong> God’s k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> notion <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uity; <strong>the</strong>re will<br />

not be a new creation (creatio nova), but a re-creation. The old world will not be done away<br />

with, but God will renew it. Instead <strong>of</strong> view<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> earth as a reality that will disappear one day,<br />

Van Ruler emphasizes <strong>the</strong> opposite: this earth, <strong>in</strong> its purified condition, will be our f<strong>in</strong>al place,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thus requires Christian engagement (such as appropriate stewardship). His doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong><br />

creation provides contemporary <strong>the</strong>ologians, like for example Ernst Conradie (2011), a firm<br />

foundation for <strong>the</strong>ir endeavors to <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong> contours <strong>of</strong> an eco-<strong>the</strong>ology.<br />

With his restoration <strong>the</strong>ology, Van Ruler def<strong>in</strong>es creation as someth<strong>in</strong>g very positive <strong>and</strong> full <strong>of</strong><br />

joy. He is able to do so, because he perceives s<strong>in</strong> as secondary to <strong>the</strong> existence God has created<br />

(Roozenboom 2007:268). S<strong>in</strong> is a serious deficit <strong>in</strong> creation, but it does not cause a complete<br />

disruption. The presence <strong>of</strong> death <strong>and</strong> transgression is real <strong>and</strong> horrible, yet <strong>the</strong>y are not to be<br />

perceived as pr<strong>in</strong>cipal entities <strong>in</strong> creation. S<strong>in</strong> is not <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> existence. God’s love <strong>and</strong><br />

creaturely life existed prior to s<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> ought to be addressed as such. Van Ruler even states that<br />

<strong>the</strong> human capacity to s<strong>in</strong> is an affirmation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> creation: <strong>the</strong> fact that one is able to<br />

s<strong>in</strong> should not be underplayed! This is what Van Ruler calls <strong>the</strong> ‘sunny side <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>’ (2009<br />

[1965]:361-363).<br />

Van Ruler’s Christology also reveals <strong>the</strong> centrality <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>in</strong> his thought about God’s<br />

redemptive activities. The work <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ, who is <strong>the</strong> One mediat<strong>in</strong>g between God <strong>and</strong><br />

humans, serves <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> creation. Van de Beek (2009:19) describes Van Ruler’s<br />

Christology as follows: God’s sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volvement is primarily about mank<strong>in</strong>d, <strong>and</strong> Christ is <strong>the</strong><br />

means for retriev<strong>in</strong>g creation from <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>. Christ is <strong>the</strong> medium, <strong>the</strong> substitute who<br />

carries <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world. The salvation <strong>of</strong> Christ means that creation has been saved for recreation.<br />

It should thus be noted, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Van Ruler, that <strong>the</strong> Christian faith affirms creation<br />

<strong>and</strong> teaches a deep joy for earthly existence.<br />

The deep joy <strong>and</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> earthly existence is also reflected <strong>in</strong> Van Ruler’s positive<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> physicality. The body is a material manifestation <strong>of</strong> God’s <strong>in</strong>tention with life, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> body is to be understood as valde bonum: <strong>in</strong> all <strong>of</strong> this materiality, visibility <strong>and</strong><br />

tangibility, human be<strong>in</strong>gs are related to God (Van Ruler 1953:30). This relationship is a mystery<br />

that is beyond human underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g, but God’s commitment to our material existence cannot be<br />

disputed, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Van Ruler. In this relationship, one should be careful to make an absolute<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between God’s be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> materiality <strong>of</strong> this world. Our materiality is basically a<br />

counter entity <strong>of</strong> God: it is not derived reality, but full reality that is genu<strong>in</strong>e both for humans <strong>and</strong><br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!