spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

one another in the sense that reconciliation through Christ refers to redemption through the Spirit, and the work of the Spirit serves Christ’s revelation and reconciliation. The work of the Holy Spirit includes not only the koinonia of the Trinitarian modes of being, and the believer’s communion with Christ, but it also produces communion with one another. The Spirit is the One who brings people together in a communion of faith, hope and love, in solidarity with the world. As such, the work of the Spirit kindles fellowship, and makes one aware that the believer, who is in communion with Christ, is relational in being (CD 4.1, 153). This means that the believer is truly connected with others and with the world in such a way that the individual is no longer just one part of the whole, but that the individual actually represents the whole (CD 2.2, 312). That is the koinonia of the Spirit of God. Spirit, creation and health The Spirit’s work in creation is heavily determined by its Christological focus. The implication is that Barth does not make a clear distinction between the Spiritus Creator and the Spiritus Redemptor, because in his perspective the work of the Spirit is aimed at leading creation into communion with Christ (CD 4.1, 648); the creative activities of the Spirit are thus redemptive activities simultaneously, in the sense that they can only be known on the basis of the Word, Jesus Christ. Barth rejects any form of knowledge about God that has its source in creation, and thus creation itself receives its meaning from the God who reveals himself in Christ. Barth’s doctrine of creation states that creation is the work of God the Father, and that creation depends on Christ. Since creation is not capable of responding properly to the self-revealing God, the Spirit comes to its aid and provides creaturely life with responses to God’s invitation to participate in His life. Barth thus prioritizes God’s sovereignty and self-revelation in such a way that the Spirit’s work is about creating situations where God’s will is done in human existence: “As the Spirit of Jesus Christ who, proceeding from Him, unites men closely to Him ut secum unum sint, He distinguishes Himself from the Spirit of God who lives as vita animalis in creation, nature and history, and to that extent in the godless as well” (CD 1.2, 241). In other words, just as the Spirit affirms and upholds inner-Trinitarian relationships, so She sustains what God has done salvifically in creation. Barth addresses the theme of health in relation to creation in his discussion of ethics as the command of God the Creator (CD 3.4, 356-374). He does not refer explicitly to the work of the Holy Spirit, but one could see how in Barth’s pneumatology the Spirit is involved in the human response to live according to God’s will. Barth defines health as the strength for human life; it is 172

the power that man receives from God in order to live a human life, to be human. In response to this gift, man should be willing to be healthy. The will to be healthy is creation’s answer to God’s will. Messer (2011:168) indicates that Barth’s ideas about the will to be healthy contrasts with our common assumptions about the relationship between health, physical perfection, and the ends of human life, because the content of our will to be healthy is Jesus Christ: he who had no form or majesty that we should look at him (Isaiah 53:2b) was truly and fully human being, and has revealed God’s will to us. Willing to be healthy, which is being fully human, thus requires direction to Christ and the testimonies of the Scriptures. Barth does not provide concrete answers to the question of what health, the strength for human life, looks like (Messer 2011:169). Besides some general remarks on the holistic dimension of health (willing to be healthy is willing to be a whole human being), and in the broad sense of willing to be healthy (hygiene, sports, medicine), Barth explicitly focuses on the role of doctors in regaining the strength to be human. He warns against overemphasizing their accomplishment: the doctor is not the one who heals; health is a gift from God. Yet he affirms the importance of medical care, because doctors and patients should cooperate in resisting the power of sickness and death. Barth (CD 3.4, 366-369) says that “the realm of death which afflicts man in the form of sickness … is opposed to His good will as Creator and has existence and power only under His mighty No. To capitulate before it, to allow it to take its course, can never be obedience but only disobedience towards God. In harmony with the will of God, what humans ought to will in face of this whole realm on the left hand, and therefore in face of sickness, can only be final resistance.… Those who take up this struggle obediently are already healthy in the fact that they do so, and theirs is no empty desire when they will to maintain or regain their health”. Another interesting notion of the will to be healthy is one’s social condition influencing one’s health. Barth (CD 3.4, 363) emphasizes that if a person wants to be healthy (as response to God’s call to obey His will), he or she cannot exclude the social context from this desire to be healthy. One’s will to be healthy can never be isolated from the (absence of) health of others: “when one person is ill, the whole of society is really ill in all its members. In the battle against sickness the final human word cannot be isolation but only fellowship”. In summary, Barth’s pneumatology is developed along Trinitarian lines. His Christocentric focus contributes to a complex approach to the distinctiveness of the Holy Spirit, which leads to strong criticism by other Reformed scholars. Barth’s understanding of the Holy Spirit is that the Spirit is clearly the mediator of the communion with Christ, with the Trinitarian God, with fellow human beings. Barth does not articulate an explicit link between Spirit and healing. According to him, health is the will to be healthy as a human response to God’s will. Since man is not able to 173

one ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that reconciliation through Christ refers to redemption through <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit serves Christ’s revelation <strong>and</strong> reconciliation.<br />

The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong>cludes not only <strong>the</strong> ko<strong>in</strong>onia <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian modes <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> believer’s communion with Christ, but it also produces communion with one ano<strong>the</strong>r. The<br />

Spirit is <strong>the</strong> One who br<strong>in</strong>gs people toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> a communion <strong>of</strong> faith, hope <strong>and</strong> love, <strong>in</strong><br />

solidarity with <strong>the</strong> world. As such, <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit k<strong>in</strong>dles fellowship, <strong>and</strong> makes one<br />

aware that <strong>the</strong> believer, who is <strong>in</strong> communion with Christ, is relational <strong>in</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g (CD 4.1, 153).<br />

This means that <strong>the</strong> believer is truly connected with o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> world <strong>in</strong> such a way that<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual is no longer just one part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole, but that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual actually represents<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole (CD 2.2, 312). That is <strong>the</strong> ko<strong>in</strong>onia <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> God.<br />

Spirit, creation <strong>and</strong> health<br />

The Spirit’s work <strong>in</strong> creation is heavily determ<strong>in</strong>ed by its Christological focus. The implication is<br />

that Barth does not make a clear dist<strong>in</strong>ction between <strong>the</strong> Spiritus Creator <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spiritus<br />

Redemptor, because <strong>in</strong> his perspective <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is aimed at lead<strong>in</strong>g creation <strong>in</strong>to<br />

communion with Christ (CD 4.1, 648); <strong>the</strong> creative activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit are thus redemptive<br />

activities simultaneously, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong>y can only be known on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Word,<br />

Jesus Christ. Barth rejects any form <strong>of</strong> knowledge about God that has its source <strong>in</strong> creation, <strong>and</strong><br />

thus creation itself receives its mean<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> God who reveals himself <strong>in</strong> Christ.<br />

Barth’s doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> creation states that creation is <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> that creation<br />

depends on Christ. S<strong>in</strong>ce creation is not capable <strong>of</strong> respond<strong>in</strong>g properly to <strong>the</strong> self-reveal<strong>in</strong>g<br />

God, <strong>the</strong> Spirit comes to its aid <strong>and</strong> provides creaturely life with responses to God’s <strong>in</strong>vitation to<br />

participate <strong>in</strong> His life. Barth thus prioritizes God’s sovereignty <strong>and</strong> self-revelation <strong>in</strong> such a way<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s work is about creat<strong>in</strong>g situations where God’s will is done <strong>in</strong> human existence:<br />

“As <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ who, proceed<strong>in</strong>g from Him, unites men closely to Him ut secum<br />

unum s<strong>in</strong>t, He dist<strong>in</strong>guishes Himself from <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> God who lives as vita animalis <strong>in</strong><br />

creation, nature <strong>and</strong> history, <strong>and</strong> to that extent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> godless as well” (CD 1.2, 241). In o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, just as <strong>the</strong> Spirit affirms <strong>and</strong> upholds <strong>in</strong>ner-Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian relationships, so She susta<strong>in</strong>s what<br />

God has done salvifically <strong>in</strong> creation.<br />

Barth addresses <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> health <strong>in</strong> relation to creation <strong>in</strong> his discussion <strong>of</strong> ethics as <strong>the</strong><br />

comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> God <strong>the</strong> Creator (CD 3.4, 356-374). He does not refer explicitly to <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Holy Spirit, but one could see how <strong>in</strong> Barth’s pneumatology <strong>the</strong> Spirit is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> human<br />

response to live accord<strong>in</strong>g to God’s will. Barth def<strong>in</strong>es health as <strong>the</strong> strength for human life; it is<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!