spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
life with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> old life through his particular grace. Roozenboom (2007:175) calls <strong>the</strong> believer’s<br />
direct participation “a typical feature <strong>of</strong> particular grace”, by which <strong>the</strong> believer, through <strong>the</strong><br />
mystical union with Christ, is considered justified on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> Christ’s perfection. The Spirit’s<br />
renewal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elect means that <strong>the</strong> believer is advanced to <strong>the</strong> position where Christ is. God<br />
reckons <strong>the</strong> believer righteous on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> Christ’s perfect accomplishment. Creation <strong>and</strong><br />
eschatology are thus closely related <strong>in</strong> Kuyper’s pneumatology, even though <strong>the</strong> eschatological<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s work does not entail notions <strong>of</strong> realized eschatology. Kuyper ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s<br />
<strong>the</strong> tension between <strong>the</strong> believer’s ‘old life’ <strong>and</strong> ‘new life’ by <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> renewal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
believer is like a new rose grafted on <strong>the</strong> stem <strong>of</strong> a wild rose, as a result <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong> new rose<br />
still relies on <strong>the</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wild rose (Kuyper 1888:152). The renewed believer is like <strong>the</strong> new<br />
rose: <strong>the</strong> completion <strong>of</strong> creation is suddenly much nearer through <strong>the</strong> graft<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new life, but<br />
<strong>the</strong> full transformation is not yet realized.<br />
Velema (1957:227-246) contends that <strong>the</strong> relation between <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>in</strong> Kuyper’s<br />
pneumatology begs for serious attention. He identifies a deficit <strong>in</strong> Kuyper’s pneumatology,<br />
which is rooted <strong>in</strong> his doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> creation <strong>and</strong> anthropology. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Kuyper, <strong>the</strong> human<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g consists <strong>of</strong> a body <strong>and</strong> a soul; <strong>the</strong> body <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> soul cannot be separated, <strong>and</strong> toge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y<br />
form <strong>the</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g (<strong>the</strong> self) <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual. In <strong>the</strong> soul, God has planted <strong>spirit</strong>ual potential that has<br />
to flourish, just like a germ has to be developed <strong>in</strong> biological life. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Kuyper, <strong>the</strong><br />
plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this <strong>spirit</strong>ual potential is <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is <strong>the</strong> One who keeps <strong>the</strong><br />
seed alive <strong>and</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>g (Velema 1957:238). The implication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> close connection between<br />
<strong>spirit</strong>ual potential <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son is that <strong>the</strong> Spirit is not <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> new <strong>spirit</strong>ual<br />
life; <strong>the</strong> Spirit is assigned to susta<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> develop it. This perspective on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit<br />
differs from <strong>the</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformers, who saw a close relationship between new (<strong>spirit</strong>ual) life<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit: conversion or regeneration was ascribed to <strong>the</strong> Word through <strong>the</strong><br />
power <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit. Velema <strong>in</strong>dicates that Kuyper’s dist<strong>in</strong>ction between <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit does not provide a fruitful basis for Reformed pneumatology (1957:244).<br />
Spirit <strong>and</strong> charismata<br />
In The Work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, Kuyper dedicates a whole chapter (XXXVII) to <strong>the</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual gifts<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. Charismata are perceived as <strong>the</strong> “div<strong>in</strong>ely orda<strong>in</strong>ed means <strong>and</strong> powers<br />
whereby <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>g enables His Church to perform its task on <strong>the</strong> earth” (Kuyper 1946:130). The<br />
charismata are framed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> church, <strong>and</strong> are <strong>the</strong> talents people have been<br />
graced with <strong>in</strong> order to serve o<strong>the</strong>rs, <strong>in</strong>side <strong>and</strong> outside <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> church. In a sense,<br />
<strong>the</strong> charismata <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit can be compared to <strong>the</strong> phenomena <strong>of</strong> fire <strong>and</strong> light with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
structure <strong>of</strong> a household: <strong>the</strong>y are not <strong>the</strong> central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> household, but <strong>the</strong>y ensure <strong>the</strong> well-<br />
167