spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

Spirit that creaturely life can exist and develop. The Spirit, then, is not only the power of God preserving life, but also the One who quickens and sustains life (vivificator). The implication is that when God withdraws His Spirit from a creature, it means death. Calvin therefore does not conceive of birth and death as framed by the natural circle of life, but as particular moments in which the world degenerates and is being renewed by the power of the life-giving Spirit (Krusche 1957:20). In Calvin’s pneumatology, the concept of the Holy Spirit as the source and sustainer of life applies to all of life: the activity of the Spirit in relation to the cosmos is universal. Yet there is a difference between the Spirit’s activity in creation in general and the Spirit’s activity in the individual life of the believer. The Spirit as the third person of the Trinity is actively present in creation, but will never become part of it: the Spirit is a divine being, who does not have a dwelling place in general creaturely existence. This is different when it comes to the particularity of believers, since the Spirit of God lives in them, the elected are the temple of the Holy Spirit. The relation between Spirit and creation is thus multidimensional, but it should be noted that Calvin does not isolate the work of the Spirit in creation in general, and the work of the Spirit in the regenerate (Höhne 2009:173). This distinction in the work of the Spirit will be elaborated at a later stage in this chapter. The presence of the Spirit in the universal cosmos is conceptualized as the providence of God. Calvin relates the Spirit’s secret sustaining activity to all different kinds of means that nourish and develop life (like the rays of the sun, bread, medical activities), and he understands these instruments or secondary causes as eventually stirred by the hand of God (Calvin 1987:231). The faithful God gives life through the use of various means (media), even though we cannot see Him as the true source of all cosmic life because He is hidden behind these instruments (Höhne 2009:162). The question can be raised whether Calvin’s doctrine of providence turns out to be a deterministic relation of God and creation, in the sense that the world is totally dependent on God, or whether the doctrine of providence also incorporates notions of contingency and of creation’s distinctiveness. Colin Gunton (1998:151) contends that Calvin’s view on divine providence lacks any proper distinction between chance and contingency, resulting in Calvin’s dismissal of the notion of contingency when he rejects the possibility of chance in the universal cosmos. According to Gunton, Calvin’s emphasis on God’s will was accompanied by a tendency to necessitarianism: the relation between God and creation is fully determined by God, with chaos as the only alternative to God’s will (see also Schreiner 1991:30, who indicates that Calvin’s doctrine of providence is ambivalent when it comes to creation’s contingency). Höhne (2009:158-178), on the contrary, is of the opinion that Calvin’s understanding of divine 160

providence allows for a limited yet definite locus of contingency: God’s working through natural and secondary causes allows for the understanding that those causes or instruments are, within boundaries, agents of contingency (like, for example, the sun travelling its own course and adjusting it seasonally). Krusche (1957:25) also refers to Calvin’s emphasis on the instruments as means for God’s providence without God becoming the author of sin. Calvin’s pneumatology sees the Holy Spirit as the sustainer of life, but not as the One who makes or determines everything in cosmic life. God works through his Spirit, who works through people (and not in them, so as not to restrict them). In his sermon on Deuteronomy 32:23-27, Calvin states that God uses secondary causes such as medicine and doctors to establish healing in cosmic life, and that God wants humans to make use of those instruments. God’s providence is thus linked with such agents of contingency in the sense that God involves secondary means in his saving activities. Calvin’s doctrine of providence also includes the gifts of grace, administered to creation by the Spirit. This is where Calvin’s notion of common grace comes in. God’s common grace is the power with which God preserves, sustains, and advances cosmic life in general, and human life in particular. This divine grace, granted to creation through the work of the Spirit, can be identified as universal common grace and as general common grace. The former is already mentioned as the Spirit’s work of sustenance; the later is to be understood as the gift of intelligence and reason which allows humans to regulate society, to govern, to develop science and arts. Calvin’s pneumatology reflects a positive understanding of creation. The Spirit of God is involved in cosmic life in a sensitive and gracious manner, allowing life to exist and unfold. The world is seen as a dazzling theatre (Inst. 1.5.8; 2.6.1) that displays God’s glorious works, and where the Holy Spirit infuses every aspect of life from work to worship and from art to technology with the gift to witness to the glory of God (Inst. 1.11.12). Spirit and redemption The concept of the believer’s union with Christ is a central element in Calvin’s theology (Hesselink 2008:345). It is only in the union with Christ that the believer can experience redemption and be saved, sanctified and even glorified. Highly significant in this mystical union is the role of the Holy Spirit, because the Spirit is the One who relates the believer to Christ. Calvin even contends that if the Spirit is not involved, the suffering of Christ and the salvation accomplished by Christ do not carry any meaning at all for us (Inst. 3.1.1). Van ‘t Spijker (1989:44) points out the soteriological meaning of the Spirit’s work by saying that only through the work of the Spirit, Christ extra nos becomes Christ in nobis. And only through the mediating 161

providence allows for a limited yet def<strong>in</strong>ite locus <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency: God’s work<strong>in</strong>g through natural<br />

<strong>and</strong> secondary causes allows for <strong>the</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g that those causes or <strong>in</strong>struments are, with<strong>in</strong><br />

boundaries, agents <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency (like, for example, <strong>the</strong> sun travell<strong>in</strong>g its own course <strong>and</strong><br />

adjust<strong>in</strong>g it seasonally). Krusche (1957:25) also refers to Calv<strong>in</strong>’s emphasis on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struments<br />

as means for God’s providence without God becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>. Calv<strong>in</strong>’s pneumatology<br />

sees <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit as <strong>the</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>er <strong>of</strong> life, but not as <strong>the</strong> One who makes or determ<strong>in</strong>es<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> cosmic life. God works through his Spirit, who works through people (<strong>and</strong> not <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>m, so as not to restrict <strong>the</strong>m). In his sermon on Deuteronomy 32:23-27, Calv<strong>in</strong> states that God<br />

uses secondary causes such as medic<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> doctors to establish <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> cosmic life, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

God wants humans to make use <strong>of</strong> those <strong>in</strong>struments. God’s providence is thus l<strong>in</strong>ked with such<br />

agents <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>gency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense that God <strong>in</strong>volves secondary means <strong>in</strong> his sav<strong>in</strong>g activities.<br />

Calv<strong>in</strong>’s doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> providence also <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> gifts <strong>of</strong> grace, adm<strong>in</strong>istered to creation by <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit. This is where Calv<strong>in</strong>’s notion <strong>of</strong> common grace comes <strong>in</strong>. God’s common grace is <strong>the</strong><br />

power with which God preserves, susta<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> advances cosmic life <strong>in</strong> general, <strong>and</strong> human life<br />

<strong>in</strong> particular. This div<strong>in</strong>e grace, granted to creation through <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, can be<br />

identified as universal common grace <strong>and</strong> as general common grace. The former is already<br />

mentioned as <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s work <strong>of</strong> sustenance; <strong>the</strong> later is to be understood as <strong>the</strong> gift <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>telligence <strong>and</strong> reason which allows humans to regulate society, to govern, to develop science<br />

<strong>and</strong> arts.<br />

Calv<strong>in</strong>’s pneumatology reflects a positive underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> creation. The Spirit <strong>of</strong> God is<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> cosmic life <strong>in</strong> a sensitive <strong>and</strong> gracious manner, allow<strong>in</strong>g life to exist <strong>and</strong> unfold. The<br />

world is seen as a dazzl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>atre (Inst. 1.5.8; 2.6.1) that displays God’s glorious works, <strong>and</strong><br />

where <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong>fuses every aspect <strong>of</strong> life from work to worship <strong>and</strong> from art to<br />

technology with <strong>the</strong> gift to witness to <strong>the</strong> glory <strong>of</strong> God (Inst. 1.11.12).<br />

Spirit <strong>and</strong> redemption<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer’s union with Christ is a central element <strong>in</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>’s <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

(Hessel<strong>in</strong>k 2008:345). It is only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> union with Christ that <strong>the</strong> believer can experience<br />

redemption <strong>and</strong> be saved, sanctified <strong>and</strong> even glorified. Highly significant <strong>in</strong> this mystical union<br />

is <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit, because <strong>the</strong> Spirit is <strong>the</strong> One who relates <strong>the</strong> believer to Christ.<br />

Calv<strong>in</strong> even contends that if <strong>the</strong> Spirit is not <strong>in</strong>volved, <strong>the</strong> suffer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Christ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> salvation<br />

accomplished by Christ do not carry any mean<strong>in</strong>g at all for us (Inst. 3.1.1). Van ‘t Spijker<br />

(1989:44) po<strong>in</strong>ts out <strong>the</strong> soteriological mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit’s work by say<strong>in</strong>g that only through<br />

<strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, Christ extra nos becomes Christ <strong>in</strong> nobis. And only through <strong>the</strong> mediat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!