spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

6.2.1 John Calvin The statement that Calvin contributed tremendously to the development of the doctrine of the Holy Spirit in the Reformed tradition is undisputed. Perhaps Benjamin Warfield’s appraisal in the introductory note in Abraham Kuyper’s The Work of the Spirit, should be nuanced a bit when he said: “the doctrine of the work of the Spirit is a gift from John Calvin to the church of Christ” (1946:17), yet the message underneath is very clear: John Calvin can be credited with being one of the greatest Reformed commentators on the Spirit (cf. Warfield 1956:484f; Hesselink 2004:79; see also the major contribution of Krusche 1957 in this regard). Calvin has been identified as ‘the theologian of the Holy Spirit’, because his theology is permeated with ideas about the work of the Holy Spirit (Ganoczy 1989:135; Hesselink 2008:337). His references to the Spirit are not always explicit, but Calvin’s understanding of the Spirit is that She plays a central role when it comes to creation, revelation, faith, justification, sanctification and glorification. The work of the Spirit is the necessary link between God and the believer. The most extensive discussions on the work of the Spirit are to be found in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 3 and Book 4. These books cover two-thirds of the complete work, which gives reason to think that the work of the Spirit occupies an important place in Calvin’s theology (cf. Rogers 2003:245). One evident feature of Calvin’s pneumatology is the Trinitarian perspective on the work of the Spirit (Krusche 1957:1-14; Gunton 1999:253-265; Hesselink 2008:337; Doyle 2009:82-105; Höhne 2009:160). First of all, the whole structure of the Institutes mirrors a Trinitarian framework. Book 1 is about God the Father and creation, Book 2 is about God the Son and our salvation, and Books 3 and 4 are about God the Spirit and our regeneration. Furthermore, Calvin articulates explicitly the union of the Father, the Son and the Spirit, for example in Inst. 1.13.17 where he indicates that he cannot think of one of the Trinitarian persons without immediately including the other two persons. According to Calvin, this Trinitarian communion is of the utmost importance when it comes to the salvation of the believer: the union with Christ established by the Spirit is nothing other than a participation in the life of the Triune God. In his commentary on John 17:21, Calvin explicitly places the work of the Spirit in a Trinitarian frame: “If the unity of the Son with the Father is not to be fruitless and useless, its power must be defused through the whole body of believers. From this, too, we infer that we are one with Christ; not because He transfuses His substance into us, but because by the power of His Spirit He communicates to us His life and all the blessings He has received from the Father” (1979:148, italics original). 158

Another feature of Calvin’s pneumatology is the multiplicity in the work of the Spirit. Krusche (1957:13) identifies three evident spheres of influence, which he calls the drei Bereiche der Geistwirksamkeit (the three dimensions of the efficacy of the Spirit). Calvin recognizes the Spirit’s efficacies in three ways that are to be viewed as concentric circles: the Spirit is present in the cosmos, in human life with its historical and contextual setting, and in the spiritual life of the believer (see CNTC 8:167, on Romans 8:14). In relation to these multiple spheres of influence of the Spirit, Rogers (2003:246) suggests that Calvin offers a fairly robust doctrine of the Spirit in the sense that he seems to overcome the dichotomy between a pneumatology of revelation and a pneumatology of participation. A pneumatology of revelation focuses on the Spirit as the One who mediates the distance between God and creation, and who offers redemptive knowledge to the believer, while a pneumatology of participation perceives the Spirit as the One who invites human life to participation within the Triune life (Williams 2000:107-127). Calvin’s pneumatology includes (at least) both dimensions of the work of the Spirit, which is apparently also reflected in a division within Calvin scholarship 36 . The addressing of different dimensions of the work of the Spirit becomes transparent when one sees how Calvin relates the Spirit to the Trinity, creation, providence, salvation, Scripture and revelation, church and Christian life. In his magisterial work on Calvin’s pneumatology, Krusche (1957:13) suggests that any exploration of the work of the Spirit is to follow Calvin’s design of Spirit/cosmos (omnes creaturae), Spirit/human life (in hominibus), Spirit/believer and church (electos). These different lines in Calvin’s pneumatology will be explored in the following paragraphs. Spirit and cosmos The first dimension of the work of the Spirit is the created cosmos. Even though Calvin does not mention the Holy Spirit in his treatment of the Creator God (in the first five chapters of Book 1 of the Institutes), he later on refers to the Spirit as being involved in the process of creating life (Hesselink 2008:340). Calvin sees the Spirit of God as the One who preserves the created order in the time between the primordial chaos (Genesis 1:2) and the eschatological transformation of cosmic elements (2 Peter 3:10). The efficacies of the Spirit prevent creation from returning to chaos, and they warrant the stability of the structure of cosmic life. One example of this wonderful sustenance by the Spirit is, according to Calvin, the consistent control over water: the Spirit is the secret power of God (arcana Dei virtus) protecting the land from being flooded by the sea (Comm. Ps. 54:5-9, CO 32:86f; Inst. 1.5.6). It is through this preserving activity of the 36. English-, Dutch- and German-speaking Calvin scholars are generally involved in debates about revelation and the Spirit as the guarantor of Scripture, while Francophone scholarship emphasized Calvin’s perspective on participation and transformation through the work of the Spirit (see Rogers 2003:245). 159

6.2.1 John Calv<strong>in</strong><br />

The statement that Calv<strong>in</strong> contributed tremendously to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformed tradition is undisputed. Perhaps Benjam<strong>in</strong> Warfield’s appraisal <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troductory note <strong>in</strong> Abraham Kuyper’s The Work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, should be nuanced a bit when<br />

he said: “<strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is a gift from John Calv<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong> church <strong>of</strong> Christ”<br />

(1946:17), yet <strong>the</strong> message underneath is very clear: John Calv<strong>in</strong> can be credited with be<strong>in</strong>g one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> greatest Reformed commentators on <strong>the</strong> Spirit (cf. Warfield 1956:484f; Hessel<strong>in</strong>k<br />

2004:79; see also <strong>the</strong> major contribution <strong>of</strong> Krusche 1957 <strong>in</strong> this regard).<br />

Calv<strong>in</strong> has been identified as ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit’, because his <strong>the</strong>ology is<br />

permeated with ideas about <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit (Ganoczy 1989:135; Hessel<strong>in</strong>k<br />

2008:337). His references to <strong>the</strong> Spirit are not always explicit, but Calv<strong>in</strong>’s underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit is that She plays a central role when it comes to creation, revelation, faith, justification,<br />

sanctification <strong>and</strong> glorification. The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is <strong>the</strong> necessary l<strong>in</strong>k between God <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

believer. The most extensive discussions on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit are to be found <strong>in</strong> his<br />

Institutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian Religion, Book 3 <strong>and</strong> Book 4. These books cover two-thirds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

complete work, which gives reason to th<strong>in</strong>k that <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit occupies an important<br />

place <strong>in</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>’s <strong>the</strong>ology (cf. Rogers 2003:245).<br />

One evident feature <strong>of</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>’s pneumatology is <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian perspective on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Spirit (Krusche 1957:1-14; Gunton 1999:253-265; Hessel<strong>in</strong>k 2008:337; Doyle 2009:82-105;<br />

Höhne 2009:160). First <strong>of</strong> all, <strong>the</strong> whole structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutes mirrors a Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian<br />

framework. Book 1 is about God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> creation, Book 2 is about God <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>and</strong> our<br />

salvation, <strong>and</strong> Books 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are about God <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>and</strong> our regeneration. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, Calv<strong>in</strong><br />

articulates explicitly <strong>the</strong> union <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, for example <strong>in</strong> Inst. 1.13.17<br />

where he <strong>in</strong>dicates that he cannot th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian persons without immediately<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two persons. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Calv<strong>in</strong>, this Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian communion is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

utmost importance when it comes to <strong>the</strong> salvation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer: <strong>the</strong> union with Christ<br />

established by <strong>the</strong> Spirit is noth<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r than a participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Triune God. In his<br />

commentary on John 17:21, Calv<strong>in</strong> explicitly places <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>in</strong> a Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian frame:<br />

“If <strong>the</strong> unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r is not to be fruitless <strong>and</strong> useless, its power must be<br />

defused through <strong>the</strong> whole body <strong>of</strong> believers. From this, too, we <strong>in</strong>fer that we are one with<br />

Christ; not because He transfuses His substance <strong>in</strong>to us, but because by <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> His Spirit<br />

He communicates to us His life <strong>and</strong> all <strong>the</strong> bless<strong>in</strong>gs He has received from <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r”<br />

(1979:148, italics orig<strong>in</strong>al).<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!