spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
6.2.1 John Calvin The statement that Calvin contributed tremendously to the development of the doctrine of the Holy Spirit in the Reformed tradition is undisputed. Perhaps Benjamin Warfield’s appraisal in the introductory note in Abraham Kuyper’s The Work of the Spirit, should be nuanced a bit when he said: “the doctrine of the work of the Spirit is a gift from John Calvin to the church of Christ” (1946:17), yet the message underneath is very clear: John Calvin can be credited with being one of the greatest Reformed commentators on the Spirit (cf. Warfield 1956:484f; Hesselink 2004:79; see also the major contribution of Krusche 1957 in this regard). Calvin has been identified as ‘the theologian of the Holy Spirit’, because his theology is permeated with ideas about the work of the Holy Spirit (Ganoczy 1989:135; Hesselink 2008:337). His references to the Spirit are not always explicit, but Calvin’s understanding of the Spirit is that She plays a central role when it comes to creation, revelation, faith, justification, sanctification and glorification. The work of the Spirit is the necessary link between God and the believer. The most extensive discussions on the work of the Spirit are to be found in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 3 and Book 4. These books cover two-thirds of the complete work, which gives reason to think that the work of the Spirit occupies an important place in Calvin’s theology (cf. Rogers 2003:245). One evident feature of Calvin’s pneumatology is the Trinitarian perspective on the work of the Spirit (Krusche 1957:1-14; Gunton 1999:253-265; Hesselink 2008:337; Doyle 2009:82-105; Höhne 2009:160). First of all, the whole structure of the Institutes mirrors a Trinitarian framework. Book 1 is about God the Father and creation, Book 2 is about God the Son and our salvation, and Books 3 and 4 are about God the Spirit and our regeneration. Furthermore, Calvin articulates explicitly the union of the Father, the Son and the Spirit, for example in Inst. 1.13.17 where he indicates that he cannot think of one of the Trinitarian persons without immediately including the other two persons. According to Calvin, this Trinitarian communion is of the utmost importance when it comes to the salvation of the believer: the union with Christ established by the Spirit is nothing other than a participation in the life of the Triune God. In his commentary on John 17:21, Calvin explicitly places the work of the Spirit in a Trinitarian frame: “If the unity of the Son with the Father is not to be fruitless and useless, its power must be defused through the whole body of believers. From this, too, we infer that we are one with Christ; not because He transfuses His substance into us, but because by the power of His Spirit He communicates to us His life and all the blessings He has received from the Father” (1979:148, italics original). 158
Another feature of Calvin’s pneumatology is the multiplicity in the work of the Spirit. Krusche (1957:13) identifies three evident spheres of influence, which he calls the drei Bereiche der Geistwirksamkeit (the three dimensions of the efficacy of the Spirit). Calvin recognizes the Spirit’s efficacies in three ways that are to be viewed as concentric circles: the Spirit is present in the cosmos, in human life with its historical and contextual setting, and in the spiritual life of the believer (see CNTC 8:167, on Romans 8:14). In relation to these multiple spheres of influence of the Spirit, Rogers (2003:246) suggests that Calvin offers a fairly robust doctrine of the Spirit in the sense that he seems to overcome the dichotomy between a pneumatology of revelation and a pneumatology of participation. A pneumatology of revelation focuses on the Spirit as the One who mediates the distance between God and creation, and who offers redemptive knowledge to the believer, while a pneumatology of participation perceives the Spirit as the One who invites human life to participation within the Triune life (Williams 2000:107-127). Calvin’s pneumatology includes (at least) both dimensions of the work of the Spirit, which is apparently also reflected in a division within Calvin scholarship 36 . The addressing of different dimensions of the work of the Spirit becomes transparent when one sees how Calvin relates the Spirit to the Trinity, creation, providence, salvation, Scripture and revelation, church and Christian life. In his magisterial work on Calvin’s pneumatology, Krusche (1957:13) suggests that any exploration of the work of the Spirit is to follow Calvin’s design of Spirit/cosmos (omnes creaturae), Spirit/human life (in hominibus), Spirit/believer and church (electos). These different lines in Calvin’s pneumatology will be explored in the following paragraphs. Spirit and cosmos The first dimension of the work of the Spirit is the created cosmos. Even though Calvin does not mention the Holy Spirit in his treatment of the Creator God (in the first five chapters of Book 1 of the Institutes), he later on refers to the Spirit as being involved in the process of creating life (Hesselink 2008:340). Calvin sees the Spirit of God as the One who preserves the created order in the time between the primordial chaos (Genesis 1:2) and the eschatological transformation of cosmic elements (2 Peter 3:10). The efficacies of the Spirit prevent creation from returning to chaos, and they warrant the stability of the structure of cosmic life. One example of this wonderful sustenance by the Spirit is, according to Calvin, the consistent control over water: the Spirit is the secret power of God (arcana Dei virtus) protecting the land from being flooded by the sea (Comm. Ps. 54:5-9, CO 32:86f; Inst. 1.5.6). It is through this preserving activity of the 36. English-, Dutch- and German-speaking Calvin scholars are generally involved in debates about revelation and the Spirit as the guarantor of Scripture, while Francophone scholarship emphasized Calvin’s perspective on participation and transformation through the work of the Spirit (see Rogers 2003:245). 159
- Page 107 and 108: This section aims at exploring some
- Page 109 and 110: assessment and prevention. However,
- Page 111 and 112: which Jesus directly turns towards
- Page 113 and 114: include the dismissal of the assume
- Page 115 and 116: 4.4.2 Quality of social life From a
- Page 117 and 118: The church now acknowledges that it
- Page 119 and 120: ehavior, has mainly determined the
- Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 5. CHURCH-BASED HEALING DIS
- Page 123 and 124: independent Pentecostal Churches, t
- Page 125 and 126: deficiencies in medical healthcare
- Page 127 and 128: that the human covenant partner nee
- Page 129 and 130: approach towards the cause of disea
- Page 131 and 132: Besides the argument that Jesus him
- Page 133 and 134: malevolent forces or demons, who ha
- Page 135 and 136: of benevolent spiritual forces in o
- Page 137 and 138: 5.3.3 Power of the Holy Spirit With
- Page 139 and 140: for Jesus’ holistic approach to t
- Page 141 and 142: prophet-healer is seen as someone w
- Page 143 and 144: church-based healing discourse does
- Page 145 and 146: church-based healing would be depri
- Page 147 and 148: who have to deal with a changing st
- Page 149 and 150: manifests itself, but it is definit
- Page 151 and 152: PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUM
- Page 153 and 154: matrix? What are the essential elem
- Page 155 and 156: the work of the Spirit? What consti
- Page 157: 6.2 REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGIES The fol
- Page 161 and 162: providence allows for a limited yet
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
- Page 177 and 178: Van Ruler deliberately distinguishe
- Page 179 and 180: The significance of Van Ruler’s a
- Page 181 and 182: historical condition of this world,
- Page 183 and 184: disabilities that they suffer, they
- Page 185 and 186: the verb. The implication is that h
- Page 187 and 188: The focus in Welker’s pneumatolog
- Page 189 and 190: the power of sin by the forgiveness
- Page 191 and 192: (becoming whole) and integrated thr
- Page 193 and 194: eorientation of Christian theology.
- Page 195 and 196: pattern of the confession — is cl
- Page 197 and 198: salvation). Questions/answers 65-82
- Page 199 and 200: (Shults 2008:271-287). The understa
- Page 201 and 202: heart. Calvin in particular was ver
- Page 203 and 204: the transformation of the believer
- Page 205 and 206: and as such dependent on God who ha
- Page 207 and 208: that healing is located outside the
6.2.1 John Calv<strong>in</strong><br />
The statement that Calv<strong>in</strong> contributed tremendously to <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Holy Spirit <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformed tradition is undisputed. Perhaps Benjam<strong>in</strong> Warfield’s appraisal <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troductory note <strong>in</strong> Abraham Kuyper’s The Work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, should be nuanced a bit when<br />
he said: “<strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is a gift from John Calv<strong>in</strong> to <strong>the</strong> church <strong>of</strong> Christ”<br />
(1946:17), yet <strong>the</strong> message underneath is very clear: John Calv<strong>in</strong> can be credited with be<strong>in</strong>g one<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> greatest Reformed commentators on <strong>the</strong> Spirit (cf. Warfield 1956:484f; Hessel<strong>in</strong>k<br />
2004:79; see also <strong>the</strong> major contribution <strong>of</strong> Krusche 1957 <strong>in</strong> this regard).<br />
Calv<strong>in</strong> has been identified as ‘<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ologian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit’, because his <strong>the</strong>ology is<br />
permeated with ideas about <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit (Ganoczy 1989:135; Hessel<strong>in</strong>k<br />
2008:337). His references to <strong>the</strong> Spirit are not always explicit, but Calv<strong>in</strong>’s underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Spirit is that She plays a central role when it comes to creation, revelation, faith, justification,<br />
sanctification <strong>and</strong> glorification. The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit is <strong>the</strong> necessary l<strong>in</strong>k between God <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
believer. The most extensive discussions on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit are to be found <strong>in</strong> his<br />
Institutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian Religion, Book 3 <strong>and</strong> Book 4. These books cover two-thirds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
complete work, which gives reason to th<strong>in</strong>k that <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit occupies an important<br />
place <strong>in</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>’s <strong>the</strong>ology (cf. Rogers 2003:245).<br />
One evident feature <strong>of</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>’s pneumatology is <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian perspective on <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Spirit (Krusche 1957:1-14; Gunton 1999:253-265; Hessel<strong>in</strong>k 2008:337; Doyle 2009:82-105;<br />
Höhne 2009:160). First <strong>of</strong> all, <strong>the</strong> whole structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Institutes mirrors a Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian<br />
framework. Book 1 is about God <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> creation, Book 2 is about God <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>and</strong> our<br />
salvation, <strong>and</strong> Books 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are about God <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>and</strong> our regeneration. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, Calv<strong>in</strong><br />
articulates explicitly <strong>the</strong> union <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> Son <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit, for example <strong>in</strong> Inst. 1.13.17<br />
where he <strong>in</strong>dicates that he cannot th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian persons without immediately<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two persons. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Calv<strong>in</strong>, this Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian communion is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
utmost importance when it comes to <strong>the</strong> salvation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> believer: <strong>the</strong> union with Christ<br />
established by <strong>the</strong> Spirit is noth<strong>in</strong>g o<strong>the</strong>r than a participation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Triune God. In his<br />
commentary on John 17:21, Calv<strong>in</strong> explicitly places <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>in</strong> a Tr<strong>in</strong>itarian frame:<br />
“If <strong>the</strong> unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Son with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r is not to be fruitless <strong>and</strong> useless, its power must be<br />
defused through <strong>the</strong> whole body <strong>of</strong> believers. From this, too, we <strong>in</strong>fer that we are one with<br />
Christ; not because He transfuses His substance <strong>in</strong>to us, but because by <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> His Spirit<br />
He communicates to us His life <strong>and</strong> all <strong>the</strong> bless<strong>in</strong>gs He has received from <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r”<br />
(1979:148, italics orig<strong>in</strong>al).<br />
158