23.06.2013 Views

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2 REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGIES<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a brief overview <strong>of</strong> pneumatological approaches by various Reformed scholars.<br />

The overview starts with <strong>the</strong> pneumatology <strong>of</strong> John Calv<strong>in</strong>. Most <strong>of</strong> his ideas about <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit can also be found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pneumatological approaches <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>fluential<br />

Reformed <strong>the</strong>ologians, as will be shown at a later stage <strong>in</strong> this chapter. It thus seems viable to<br />

start with Calv<strong>in</strong>’s pneumatology, <strong>and</strong> to complement it with <strong>the</strong> pneumatological proposals <strong>of</strong><br />

Reformed <strong>the</strong>ologians like Abraham Kuyper, Karl Barth, Arnold Van Ruler, Jürgen Moltmann,<br />

Michael Welker <strong>and</strong> Jan Veenh<strong>of</strong>. I have chosen <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>ologians because <strong>the</strong>y have had a<br />

significant <strong>in</strong>fluence on <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se approaches were <strong>of</strong><br />

particular significance for Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> South Africa (<strong>and</strong> thus also <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa).<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r reason for <strong>the</strong> selection is <strong>the</strong> fact that each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se Reformed <strong>the</strong>ologians has <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r dist<strong>in</strong>ctive <strong>and</strong> outl<strong>in</strong>ed ideas perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit. This makes it<br />

feasible to present <strong>the</strong>ir pneumatological proposals <strong>in</strong> broad terms 35 . It is not my <strong>in</strong>tention to<br />

suggest that this brief overview will do justice to <strong>the</strong> rich <strong>and</strong> extensive pneumatological<br />

approaches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above mentioned Reformed scholars. However, it is my hope that <strong>the</strong> synopsis<br />

will give an adequate impression <strong>of</strong> Reformed pneumatological thought. The systematic<br />

approaches to <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit will be followed by a presentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

pneumatological perspective found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Heidelberg Catechism. F<strong>in</strong>ally <strong>the</strong> question will be<br />

asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re are notions, motifs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes emerg<strong>in</strong>g from this discussion that can <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

a matrix <strong>of</strong> Reformed pneumatology.<br />

35. In <strong>the</strong> description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pneumatological proposals presented <strong>in</strong> this chapter as well as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis, I<br />

will refer to <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit as ‘She’. The deliberate use <strong>of</strong> this fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e pronoun is motivated by <strong>the</strong> challenge <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> faulty nature <strong>of</strong> human language about God. Speak<strong>in</strong>g God requires constant awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unknown side <strong>of</strong><br />

God, <strong>the</strong> transcendent life <strong>of</strong> God that can never be conf<strong>in</strong>ed by human speech. The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e pronoun <strong>in</strong><br />

this <strong>the</strong>sis is thus not meant as a pla<strong>in</strong> correction <strong>of</strong> traditional speech about God, because <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> ‘she’ <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong><br />

‘he’ will obviously lead to overcorrection <strong>and</strong> thus to a shift <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> problem. By referr<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Spirit as ‘She’ I try<br />

to f<strong>in</strong>d language about God <strong>the</strong> Spirit, while I try to avoid <strong>the</strong> pitfall <strong>of</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g words about God for granted. The use<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e pronoun functions as a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> speed hump: it helps to slow down <strong>and</strong> to notice <strong>the</strong> flaws <strong>in</strong> our<br />

language about God. For example, when God is expressed as male, <strong>in</strong> a sense maleness becomes div<strong>in</strong>e; when God<br />

is pictured as white, somehow whiteness becomes div<strong>in</strong>e. Despite firm resistance to <strong>the</strong>se projections, <strong>the</strong>re is a twothous<strong>and</strong><br />

year tradition that seems to have taken <strong>the</strong>se projections for granted. Precisely by nam<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> opposite <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se projections (‘she’ <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> ‘he’, ‘black’ <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> ‘white’, ‘disabled’ <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> ‘able’, ‘weak’ <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong><br />

‘strong’, ‘unhealthy’ <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> ‘healthy’), one can at least detect <strong>the</strong> flaws <strong>in</strong> our language. As long as <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e pronoun for God <strong>the</strong> Spirit evokes questions (whe<strong>the</strong>r positive or negative), its relevance for po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

God’s transcendence is proven.<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!