spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit? What constitutes <strong>the</strong> matrix <strong>of</strong> Reformed pneumatology? Is it possible to<br />
<strong>in</strong>timate <strong>the</strong> contours <strong>of</strong> a Reformed pneumatological matrix? Could such a matrix assist <strong>in</strong><br />
identify<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>the</strong>mes <strong>and</strong> motifs for articulat<strong>in</strong>g a l<strong>in</strong>k between God <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
Africa?<br />
6.1 DILEMMA OF ARTICULATING A REFORMED MATRIX<br />
It is a challenge to describe <strong>the</strong> typical nature <strong>of</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology. Some even refer to it as <strong>the</strong><br />
‘Reformed embarrassment’ (Busch 2008:207). Unlike, for example, <strong>the</strong> Roman Catholic,<br />
Lu<strong>the</strong>ran <strong>and</strong> Anglican tradition, <strong>the</strong> Reformed tradition does not have one particular authority or<br />
confession that unites all Reformed believers <strong>and</strong> that represents ‘<strong>the</strong>’ Reformed perspective<br />
(Hartvelt 1991:4; Smit 2009:58). The notoriously difficult task <strong>of</strong> describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> unity <strong>of</strong><br />
Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology has to do with <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition itself: it is plural, diverse, selfcritical<br />
<strong>and</strong> sensitive to <strong>the</strong> cultural context <strong>in</strong> which it witnesses <strong>the</strong> truth <strong>of</strong> God’s Word (see<br />
Smit 2011:313-326). The crucial issue <strong>in</strong> discern<strong>in</strong>g constituents <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformed identity is <strong>the</strong><br />
tension between <strong>the</strong> danger <strong>of</strong> reductionism or essentialism, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> danger <strong>of</strong> los<strong>in</strong>g identity<br />
when mov<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> shift<strong>in</strong>g Zeitgeist. This tension is articulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> question “how can we<br />
exhibit <strong>the</strong> proper characteristics <strong>of</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> order to clarify <strong>and</strong> streng<strong>the</strong>n it (…),<br />
<strong>and</strong> do so without be<strong>in</strong>g merely traditionalist, confessionalist, <strong>and</strong> anti-ecumenical?” (Sauter<br />
2004:4).<br />
In his effort to address <strong>and</strong> del<strong>in</strong>eate Reformed identity <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> confessions, Gerrit<br />
Hartvelt (1991) relates <strong>the</strong> Reformed frame <strong>of</strong> reference (God’s revelation <strong>in</strong> Christ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Scriptures) to o<strong>the</strong>r traditions <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir specifics, <strong>the</strong>ir dist<strong>in</strong>ct core <strong>of</strong> confession. His method<br />
reveals two important notions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Reformed identity: <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> a clear-cut, unchang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
nucleus <strong>of</strong> what could be called ‘Reformed’, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for dialogue with o<strong>the</strong>r church<br />
traditions <strong>in</strong> order to <strong>of</strong>fer a particular contribution towards underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Gospel. Hartvelt<br />
(1991:18-34) emphasizes <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> ecumenicity for <strong>the</strong> Reformed identity, because<br />
ecumenical relationships <strong>and</strong> dialogue have an impact on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> specifics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Reformed frame <strong>of</strong> reference. Dirkie Smit (1992:88-110; 2004:263-283; 2008:263-283;<br />
2011:313-326) also supports <strong>the</strong> idea that although <strong>the</strong> Reformed tradition is confessional, this<br />
characteristic must be understood <strong>in</strong> an open, historical <strong>and</strong> contextual way. With regard to <strong>the</strong><br />
Reformed tradition <strong>in</strong> South Africa, he refers to <strong>the</strong> Reformed story as a story <strong>of</strong> many stories. It<br />
is a complex tale, reveal<strong>in</strong>g that Reformed identity consists <strong>of</strong> diverse <strong>and</strong> ambiguous stories<br />
with <strong>the</strong>ir vary<strong>in</strong>g accents on confession, doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>and</strong> cultural context. It is impossible to<br />
simplify <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>ternal differences <strong>and</strong> contradictions <strong>in</strong>to one Reformed narrative. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
155