23.06.2013 Views

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGY FOR<br />

AFRICA: FRAGMENTS ON SPIRIT AND HEALING<br />

On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> Chapters 1-5, a few conclusions may be made. The first is that health is a social<br />

construct, mean<strong>in</strong>g that one’s social context is <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factor for one’s underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />

health. This also means, <strong>and</strong> this is <strong>the</strong> second conclusion, that <strong>the</strong>re are multiple underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>of</strong> health. When a particular health conceptualization is formulated with<strong>in</strong> a systematic or<br />

coherent pattern <strong>of</strong> ideas <strong>and</strong> practices, this coherent structure can be characterized as a health<br />

discourse. Thus, <strong>the</strong> third conclusion is that with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn African context a number <strong>of</strong><br />

different health discourses can be identified. In <strong>the</strong> present research, four prom<strong>in</strong>ent health<br />

discourses were studied: <strong>the</strong> ngoma discourse, <strong>the</strong> missionary medic<strong>in</strong>e discourse, <strong>the</strong> HIV/AIDS<br />

discourse, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> church-based <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> discourse. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong> fourth conclusion is that each <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se African health discourses is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by a particular motif, which characterizes how<br />

health is <strong>in</strong>terpreted accord<strong>in</strong>g to that specific health discourse: as relationality, as<br />

transformation, as quality <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>and</strong> as power.<br />

Exploration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relation between African health motifs <strong>and</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second part <strong>of</strong> this <strong>the</strong>sis is to consider <strong>and</strong> construct a relationship between<br />

African health discourses <strong>and</strong> Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology. It is about explor<strong>in</strong>g a relationship that has<br />

been scarcely addressed so far <strong>in</strong> scholarly contributions. It is not my <strong>in</strong>tention to defend <strong>the</strong><br />

Reformed perspective vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> various African health discourses. Nor is it my <strong>in</strong>tention to<br />

suggest a seamless congruence between Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>and</strong> African health discourses.<br />

Nei<strong>the</strong>r would do justice to Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology or to African health discourses. The exploratory<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research is driven by a particular <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g productive avenues<br />

for Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa, through which <strong>the</strong> multi-layered underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />

health can be related to <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit <strong>and</strong> hence new articulations <strong>of</strong> God <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> can be identified.<br />

What would happen, <strong>the</strong>refore, if <strong>the</strong>re was an encounter between exist<strong>in</strong>g African health<br />

discourses, as described <strong>in</strong> Chapters 2-5, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> central motifs <strong>of</strong> Reformed pneumatology? Or,<br />

if <strong>the</strong> core ideas <strong>of</strong> African health discourses were <strong>in</strong>vited <strong>in</strong>to Reformed <strong>the</strong>ological discourse?<br />

Would it be possible to discern some convergence <strong>of</strong> culturally determ<strong>in</strong>ed health notions <strong>and</strong><br />

particular motifs <strong>in</strong> Reformed thought? Are <strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong>surmountable differences that h<strong>in</strong>der an<br />

encounter between contextual frames <strong>of</strong> health <strong>and</strong> contextual Reformed <strong>the</strong>ology? Or could it<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!