spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
can as well open up a relationship to God as the experience of being saved”. This way, Westermann places healing within the framework of the covenant between God and his people. 5.2.2 New Testament understandings of healing In the New Testament, healing is inextricably linked with the concept of the new covenant in Christ, as well as with the promise of God’s Kingdom. The new covenant in Christ is a continuation and renewal of the divine covenants with Abraham, Moses and David. In Christ, Yahweh reveals that he makes a new beginning, and he realizes for his people the possibility to remain faithful to the covenant. In Jesus’ death the new covenant is initiated, and healing can then be considered as a gift or grace related to the covenant. As such, healing in general can be linked indirectly to the atoning death of Christ, who inaugurated the new covenant and bestowed healing as a promised blessing upon the covenant partner (De Vries 2006:380). The biblical concept of the new covenant is related to the concept of the Kingdom. After all, the thoughts on the new covenant, as found in the Old Testament and the New Testament, lead to the recognition of God’s reign. In the light of the (renewed) promise of shalom, the miracles performed by Jesus testify to the manifestations of God’s emerging rule. Regarding approaches to healing in the New Testament, academic attention predominantly focused on the healing miracles Jesus performed during his earthly ministry. On the basis of historical critical research there is scholarly consensus that Jesus performed miracles (cf. Twelftree 1984, 1993; Blomberg 1987:90; Wink 1992:134f; Meier 1994:607; Habermas 2001:117; Williams 2002; Borg 2006), and it is now widely accepted to consider Jesus as healer and exorcist. The synoptic gospels in particular present Jesus’ healing and liberating activities as a sign of God’s coming kingdom (cf. Carroll 1995:137; Giesen 1995:65; De Vries 2006:391f). The miracles are construed as references and as provisional manifestations of the kingdom, arriving in the person of Jesus Christ. Twelftree (1993:170) contends that the miracles that Jesus performs, constitute the actual message: the miracles “are the kingdom of God in operation”. The reign of God implies the overthrowing of the kingdom of Satan (cf. France 1990:28f; Giesen 1995:44ff; De Vries 2006:389). In the New Testament, disease is also attributed to Satan, who obstructs the well-being (shalom) of God’s people. So Jesus’ acts of forgiveness, liberation, healing and resurrection are inherent in reducing the power of Satan and demonic spirits. Or, in the words of Goppelt (1978:119), Jesus’ healing miracles imply spiritual, physical and social healing. Contrary to the Old Testament, the idea that disease and healing evolve from God is not found in the New Testament in the same direct manner. New Testament thinking ignores a uniform 128
approach towards the cause of disease, and offers a variety of sources for disease and suffering. One of the causes of illness is the power of the devil or Satan, who in the New Testament has a more independent position in relation to the reign of God. In addition, matters like personal responsibility, punishment for sin and/or the prelude for repentance, and the absence of a clear cause are also involved in New Testament understandings of illness. De Vries (2006:423) stresses that the Scriptures show no explicit link between disease and demise, and he refers to Thomas (1998:304), who says: “despite the frequent appearance of such views in contemporary theological explanations of the origins of illness, it is interesting that in New Testament discussions about the origins of illness the writers never explain the presence of infirmity as being simply the result of living in a fallen sinful world”. All in all, it can be said that all studies related to healing and disease show that the biblical starting point is that the God of the Scriptures is a healing God. The biblical stories are witness to God’s comprehensive commitment to healing and wholeness for all creation, for all people. God is actively involved in the healing and restoration of people, and He involves Himself in the process of reconciliation and regeneration. The covenant provides the context for understanding healing, as well as the perspective of the kingdom that bears the tension of the ‘already’ and the ‘not yet’. 5.2.3 Biblical roots of healing ministries The way in which, in the African context, meaning is attached to illness and evil shows remarkable similarities with how illness and evil are depicted in both the Old and the New Testament. Illness, sin and ritual transgressions are major obstacles to the human being, who desires life in abundance but who is continuously confronted with the impact of evil forces (cf. De Vries 2006:420). The biblical message for healing, restoration and liberation clearly acknowledges the existence of evil forces, and addresses their impact on the human being, that is on his or her relationships and future. In Scripture, healing or restoration is not restricted to the body, but includes a person’s spirit as well as their material goods such as land, children, cattle and prosperity (Wind 1995:153; Westermann 1972:10). Jenkins (2006:117) asserts that “the biblical emphasis on healing rings so true to modern believers because it fits precisely into their cultural expectations and the healing traditions of pre-Christian societies”. From an African Christian perspective, healing and wholeness are the core of the Christian message and mission. One could wonder what would be left of the Gospel if one were to remove all healing-related stories from Scripture, or interpret them from a strictly psychological point of view. Stories of miraculous healings and effective exorcisms are taken seriously and literally, 129
- Page 77 and 78: exclusive and divergent therapy, th
- Page 79 and 80: merely regarded as the mirror of th
- Page 81 and 82: esearch starts (as it is in convent
- Page 83 and 84: a given society), but it should be
- Page 85 and 86: eliefs and deeds were reproduced th
- Page 87 and 88: missionary discourse focuses not on
- Page 89 and 90: The notion of transformation result
- Page 91 and 92: 3.5.3 Transformation without superi
- Page 93 and 94: The transformation of biomedicine i
- Page 95 and 96: people make sense of health and ill
- Page 97 and 98: ut should have narratives and perso
- Page 99 and 100: these, but all of them include, imp
- Page 101 and 102: Epidemiological constructions of AI
- Page 103 and 104: investigating sexual activities wit
- Page 105 and 106: within a specific society. The ackn
- Page 107 and 108: This section aims at exploring some
- Page 109 and 110: assessment and prevention. However,
- Page 111 and 112: which Jesus directly turns towards
- Page 113 and 114: include the dismissal of the assume
- Page 115 and 116: 4.4.2 Quality of social life From a
- Page 117 and 118: The church now acknowledges that it
- Page 119 and 120: ehavior, has mainly determined the
- Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 5. CHURCH-BASED HEALING DIS
- Page 123 and 124: independent Pentecostal Churches, t
- Page 125 and 126: deficiencies in medical healthcare
- Page 127: that the human covenant partner nee
- Page 131 and 132: Besides the argument that Jesus him
- Page 133 and 134: malevolent forces or demons, who ha
- Page 135 and 136: of benevolent spiritual forces in o
- Page 137 and 138: 5.3.3 Power of the Holy Spirit With
- Page 139 and 140: for Jesus’ holistic approach to t
- Page 141 and 142: prophet-healer is seen as someone w
- Page 143 and 144: church-based healing discourse does
- Page 145 and 146: church-based healing would be depri
- Page 147 and 148: who have to deal with a changing st
- Page 149 and 150: manifests itself, but it is definit
- Page 151 and 152: PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUM
- Page 153 and 154: matrix? What are the essential elem
- Page 155 and 156: the work of the Spirit? What consti
- Page 157 and 158: 6.2 REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGIES The fol
- Page 159 and 160: Another feature of Calvin’s pneum
- Page 161 and 162: providence allows for a limited yet
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
- Page 177 and 178: Van Ruler deliberately distinguishe
can as well open up a relationship to God as <strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g saved”. This way,<br />
Westermann places <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant between God <strong>and</strong> his people.<br />
5.2.2 New Testament underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
In <strong>the</strong> New Testament, <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is <strong>in</strong>extricably l<strong>in</strong>ked with <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new covenant <strong>in</strong><br />
Christ, as well as with <strong>the</strong> promise <strong>of</strong> God’s K<strong>in</strong>gdom. The new covenant <strong>in</strong> Christ is a<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uation <strong>and</strong> renewal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> div<strong>in</strong>e covenants with Abraham, Moses <strong>and</strong> David. In Christ,<br />
Yahweh reveals that he makes a new beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> he realizes for his people <strong>the</strong> possibility to<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> faithful to <strong>the</strong> covenant. In Jesus’ death <strong>the</strong> new covenant is <strong>in</strong>itiated, <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> can<br />
<strong>the</strong>n be considered as a gift or grace related to <strong>the</strong> covenant. As such, <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> general can be<br />
l<strong>in</strong>ked <strong>in</strong>directly to <strong>the</strong> aton<strong>in</strong>g death <strong>of</strong> Christ, who <strong>in</strong>augurated <strong>the</strong> new covenant <strong>and</strong> bestowed<br />
<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as a promised bless<strong>in</strong>g upon <strong>the</strong> covenant partner (De Vries 2006:380). The biblical<br />
concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new covenant is related to <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom. After all, <strong>the</strong> thoughts on<br />
<strong>the</strong> new covenant, as found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament, lead to <strong>the</strong> recognition<br />
<strong>of</strong> God’s reign. In <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> (renewed) promise <strong>of</strong> shalom, <strong>the</strong> miracles performed by Jesus<br />
testify to <strong>the</strong> manifestations <strong>of</strong> God’s emerg<strong>in</strong>g rule.<br />
Regard<strong>in</strong>g approaches to <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Testament, academic attention predom<strong>in</strong>antly<br />
focused on <strong>the</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> miracles Jesus performed dur<strong>in</strong>g his earthly m<strong>in</strong>istry. On <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong><br />
historical critical research <strong>the</strong>re is scholarly consensus that Jesus performed miracles (cf.<br />
Twelftree 1984, 1993; Blomberg 1987:90; W<strong>in</strong>k 1992:134f; Meier 1994:607; Habermas<br />
2001:117; Williams 2002; Borg 2006), <strong>and</strong> it is now widely accepted to consider Jesus as healer<br />
<strong>and</strong> exorcist. The synoptic gospels <strong>in</strong> particular present Jesus’ <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> liberat<strong>in</strong>g activities as<br />
a sign <strong>of</strong> God’s com<strong>in</strong>g k<strong>in</strong>gdom (cf. Carroll 1995:137; Giesen 1995:65; De Vries 2006:391f).<br />
The miracles are construed as references <strong>and</strong> as provisional manifestations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom,<br />
arriv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> person <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ. Twelftree (1993:170) contends that <strong>the</strong> miracles that Jesus<br />
performs, constitute <strong>the</strong> actual message: <strong>the</strong> miracles “are <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> God <strong>in</strong> operation”. The<br />
reign <strong>of</strong> God implies <strong>the</strong> overthrow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> Satan (cf. France 1990:28f; Giesen<br />
1995:44ff; De Vries 2006:389). In <strong>the</strong> New Testament, disease is also attributed to Satan, who<br />
obstructs <strong>the</strong> well-be<strong>in</strong>g (shalom) <strong>of</strong> God’s people. So Jesus’ acts <strong>of</strong> forgiveness, liberation,<br />
<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> resurrection are <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> Satan <strong>and</strong> demonic <strong>spirit</strong>s. Or, <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> Goppelt (1978:119), Jesus’ <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> miracles imply <strong>spirit</strong>ual, physical <strong>and</strong> social<br />
<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
Contrary to <strong>the</strong> Old Testament, <strong>the</strong> idea that disease <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> evolve from God is not found <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> New Testament <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same direct manner. New Testament th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g ignores a uniform<br />
128