spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
captivates creation. The interventionist theology and the material conception of evil constitute the pillars of exorcism. In fact, Pentecostals prefer to speak about deliverance rather than about exorcism, because deliverance presupposes that the spiritual intervention is much broader than the act of expelling the demons: the believer is going to be possessed by the good Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit (Kalu 2008:172). 5.2 ACADEMIC DISCOURSE ON HEALING IN THE BIBLE Health and disease are themes with a prominent place in the biblical tradition. The Scriptures visit these themes over and over again, and make it clear that the pursuit of healing is part of the relationship of God and creation. The discipline of Biblical Theology regularly generates studies that deal with the meaning of biblical healing, and a kind of sub-discourse developed, based on scholarly research into the nature of healing in the Bible (cf. Westermann 1972; Brown 1995; Carroll 1995; Kelsey 3 1995; Brueggemann 1997:252-255; Pilch 2000; Porterfield 2005; Gaiser 2010). Particularly in New Testament studies there is greater attention paid to the miracles of Jesus (while previously attention was drawn to the instruction, teaching and wisdom of Jesus’ ministry). The Jesus Seminar, among others, has generated interest in historical critical analysis of Jesus’ miracles. Sources like the works of Kelsey, Brown, Porterfield and Gaiser provide an in-depth discussion of the meaning of healing in the Bible. Below there follows a brief review of what scholarly research has brought to light relating to healing and disease in the Scriptures. 5.2.1 Old Testament understandings of healing In the Old Testament writings, healing is a concept with various meanings. The general framework in which health, illness and healing can be understood, is the covenant between God and his people. This covenant is to be regarded as a binding partnership with which Yahweh wants to preserve his creation against destruction. De Vries (2006:352) emphasizes that this is a redemptive partnership, in which God is seen as the source of healing and restoration. The fundamental idea is that God aims to bless his covenant partner with a shalom status (cf. De Vries 2006:358, who refers to Quell 1974:122; see also Louw 2008:110). In this context, disease is a form of disintegration, and healing is a process or condition referring to restoration in the relationship with God. Within the Old Testament framework of the covenant, De Vries notices two modes of blessing that embrace healing (2006:358ff). First of all, there is the blessing of the covenant in the Torah that brings protection against disease. God’s covenant initiative brings blessing and shalom for his people. This shalom refers to tangible and this-worldly well-being, and is mentioned in relation to an abundant and protected life in the land that God will give. The covenant implies 126
that the human covenant partner needs to adhere to the covenant conditions and to respect God’s precepts. Compliance with the rules of the covenant will generate blessing, but disregard of the conditions will lead to curse. Exodus 15:25f and Exodus 23:23f are considered to be key texts in biblical terms about health and healing. Then there is also the blessing of the covenant in the Prophets, in which blessing is considered as healing from disease instead of protection. Even in the Prophets we find a theology of curse and blessing within the framework of the covenant, but, unlike in the Torah, blessing features in the Prophets when God offers a new chance to the covenant relation that has been damaged due to the disobedience of the people of Israel. The blessing, then, has the nature of a promise of future recovery (that is healing, both literally and figuratively) rather than the notion of safeguard against misfortune. However, the covenant is not the only category in which the Old Testament deals with healing. De Vries (2006:362f) points out that on the basis of healing stories, which do not occur often in the Old Testament, it can be said that healing is also about (1) the recognition of the power of Yahweh in relation to idols. The resurrection miracle in Sarafat (1 Kings 17) as well as the healing of Naaman (2 Kings 5) testify to the idea that even those who do not belong to the covenant of Israel may share in the salvation of Yahweh, after Yahweh’s prophet is obeyed and the name of Yahweh is glorified. And (2) the sovereign act of God for the realization of his history of salvation is a source of healing. The barrenness of Sara (Genesis 17:15-21; 18:10-14; 21:1f), Rebekah (Genesis 25:21) and Rachel (Genesis 30:22f) lead to God’s dealings that ignore human limits because God’s salvation history must come to realization. Finally, (3) the faithfulness of Yahweh to king David also provides a framework in which healing occurs. In 2 Kings 20:1-11, King Hezekiah is cured from a skin disease because of the relationship of God and Hezekiah’s father David. Westermann (1972) points out that healing and salvation may be different in character in the Old Testament, but that healing should not be subordinated to salvation, as Christian theology has always done. He too emphasizes that healing in the Old Testament is understood to mean blessing. Healing occupies a central place in human existence, and is quite naturally considered the work of God. In a continuous and silent way God blesses people with wholeness of life, since that is God’s purpose and will for his creation. Westermann asserts that salvation is God’s other way of dealing with his people. God’s saving action towards a particular people carries more of a communal notion, while healing in the form of blessing is of individual character, leaving it to the ‘diseased’ individual to see God’s hand in the healing (or even in the absence of healing). Westermann (1972:19) balances healing and salvation by saying that “the experience of healing 127
- Page 75 and 76: determined the course of missionary
- Page 77 and 78: exclusive and divergent therapy, th
- Page 79 and 80: merely regarded as the mirror of th
- Page 81 and 82: esearch starts (as it is in convent
- Page 83 and 84: a given society), but it should be
- Page 85 and 86: eliefs and deeds were reproduced th
- Page 87 and 88: missionary discourse focuses not on
- Page 89 and 90: The notion of transformation result
- Page 91 and 92: 3.5.3 Transformation without superi
- Page 93 and 94: The transformation of biomedicine i
- Page 95 and 96: people make sense of health and ill
- Page 97 and 98: ut should have narratives and perso
- Page 99 and 100: these, but all of them include, imp
- Page 101 and 102: Epidemiological constructions of AI
- Page 103 and 104: investigating sexual activities wit
- Page 105 and 106: within a specific society. The ackn
- Page 107 and 108: This section aims at exploring some
- Page 109 and 110: assessment and prevention. However,
- Page 111 and 112: which Jesus directly turns towards
- Page 113 and 114: include the dismissal of the assume
- Page 115 and 116: 4.4.2 Quality of social life From a
- Page 117 and 118: The church now acknowledges that it
- Page 119 and 120: ehavior, has mainly determined the
- Page 121 and 122: CHAPTER 5. CHURCH-BASED HEALING DIS
- Page 123 and 124: independent Pentecostal Churches, t
- Page 125: deficiencies in medical healthcare
- Page 129 and 130: approach towards the cause of disea
- Page 131 and 132: Besides the argument that Jesus him
- Page 133 and 134: malevolent forces or demons, who ha
- Page 135 and 136: of benevolent spiritual forces in o
- Page 137 and 138: 5.3.3 Power of the Holy Spirit With
- Page 139 and 140: for Jesus’ holistic approach to t
- Page 141 and 142: prophet-healer is seen as someone w
- Page 143 and 144: church-based healing discourse does
- Page 145 and 146: church-based healing would be depri
- Page 147 and 148: who have to deal with a changing st
- Page 149 and 150: manifests itself, but it is definit
- Page 151 and 152: PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUM
- Page 153 and 154: matrix? What are the essential elem
- Page 155 and 156: the work of the Spirit? What consti
- Page 157 and 158: 6.2 REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGIES The fol
- Page 159 and 160: Another feature of Calvin’s pneum
- Page 161 and 162: providence allows for a limited yet
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
- Page 173 and 174: the power that man receives from Go
- Page 175 and 176: any room for dualism between heaven
captivates creation. The <strong>in</strong>terventionist <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> material conception <strong>of</strong> evil constitute<br />
<strong>the</strong> pillars <strong>of</strong> exorcism. In fact, Pentecostals prefer to speak about deliverance ra<strong>the</strong>r than about<br />
exorcism, because deliverance presupposes that <strong>the</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual <strong>in</strong>tervention is much broader than<br />
<strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> expell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> demons: <strong>the</strong> believer is go<strong>in</strong>g to be possessed by <strong>the</strong> good Spirit <strong>of</strong> God,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Holy Spirit (Kalu 2008:172).<br />
5.2 ACADEMIC DISCOURSE ON HEALING IN THE BIBLE<br />
Health <strong>and</strong> disease are <strong>the</strong>mes with a prom<strong>in</strong>ent place <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> biblical tradition. The Scriptures<br />
visit <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong>mes over <strong>and</strong> over aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> make it clear that <strong>the</strong> pursuit <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
relationship <strong>of</strong> God <strong>and</strong> creation. The discipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Biblical Theology regularly generates studies<br />
that deal with <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> biblical <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, <strong>and</strong> a k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> sub-discourse developed, based on<br />
scholarly research <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible (cf. Westermann 1972; Brown 1995;<br />
Carroll 1995; Kelsey 3 1995; Brueggemann 1997:252-255; Pilch 2000; Porterfield 2005; Gaiser<br />
2010). Particularly <strong>in</strong> New Testament studies <strong>the</strong>re is greater attention paid to <strong>the</strong> miracles <strong>of</strong><br />
Jesus (while previously attention was drawn to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>struction, teach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> wisdom <strong>of</strong> Jesus’<br />
m<strong>in</strong>istry). The Jesus Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, among o<strong>the</strong>rs, has generated <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> historical critical analysis<br />
<strong>of</strong> Jesus’ miracles. Sources like <strong>the</strong> works <strong>of</strong> Kelsey, Brown, Porterfield <strong>and</strong> Gaiser provide an<br />
<strong>in</strong>-depth discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible. Below <strong>the</strong>re follows a brief review <strong>of</strong><br />
what scholarly research has brought to light relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> disease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Scriptures.<br />
5.2.1 Old Testament underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
In <strong>the</strong> Old Testament writ<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is a concept with various mean<strong>in</strong>gs. The general<br />
framework <strong>in</strong> which health, illness <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> can be understood, is <strong>the</strong> covenant between God<br />
<strong>and</strong> his people. This covenant is to be regarded as a b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g partnership with which Yahweh<br />
wants to preserve his creation aga<strong>in</strong>st destruction. De Vries (2006:352) emphasizes that this is a<br />
redemptive partnership, <strong>in</strong> which God is seen as <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> restoration. The<br />
fundamental idea is that God aims to bless his covenant partner with a shalom status (cf. De<br />
Vries 2006:358, who refers to Quell 1974:122; see also Louw 2008:110). In this context, disease<br />
is a form <strong>of</strong> dis<strong>in</strong>tegration, <strong>and</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is a process or condition referr<strong>in</strong>g to restoration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
relationship with God.<br />
With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant, De Vries notices two modes <strong>of</strong> bless<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that embrace <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (2006:358ff). First <strong>of</strong> all, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> bless<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Torah<br />
that br<strong>in</strong>gs protection aga<strong>in</strong>st disease. God’s covenant <strong>in</strong>itiative br<strong>in</strong>gs bless<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> shalom for<br />
his people. This shalom refers to tangible <strong>and</strong> this-worldly well-be<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> is mentioned <strong>in</strong><br />
relation to an abundant <strong>and</strong> protected life <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong> that God will give. The covenant implies<br />
126