spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State
that nearly every faith community in Southern Africa concedes that the church has a contribution to make to the process of healing and wholeness of humanity. 5.1 CHURCH-BASED HEALING DISCOURSE IN GENERAL The church-based healing discourse is, generally speaking, linked to particular churches in Africa: the African Instituted Churches (AICs) and the Pentecostal and Charismatic Churches (PCCs). After a brief description of the typology of these churches, and after focusing on the impact HIV/AIDS has had on faith healing, the theme of exorcism and deliverance is introduced, since exorcism is generally considered to be the core of church-based healing activities. 5.1.1 Typology of churches What kind of churches are involved in the church-based healing discourse? Following the research trends, there are two prominent ecclesiological movements that determine the discourse. The first is the movement of the African Instituted Churches (AIC). Depending on one’s perspective, the acronym AIC can also stand for African Indigenous Churches, African Independent Churches or African Initiated Churches. The AICs are churches that came into existence at the end of the nineteenth century in response to the missionary-founded churches. They were founded and are run by Africans, who succeed in making the message of the Gospel relevant to the African indigenous worldview. The AIC movement is often perceived as an authentic African expression of Christianity (see Omenyo 2000:233), because the AICs created space for certain spiritual or pneumatic elements that are of great importance within the African context but that were not allowed to exist within the missionary-founded churches. The Aladura Churches (meaning ‘praying people’ in Yoruba) in West Africa, and the Zion/Apostolic Churches in Southern Africa are important representations of the AIC movement 30 . The explosive growth that features the AIC movement also turns out to be one of the main characteristics of the Pentecostal and Charismatic Churches (PCC). The PCCs constitute the other dominant theme within the faith-healing discourse. The Pentecostal movement can be divided into two sub-divisions: the first one embraces the classical Pentecostal denominations (like, for example, the Assemblies of God), that have been present in sub-Saharan Africa since the onset of the twentieth century. The second sub-division is the neo-Pentecostals, the younger 30. A lot has been written about the AIC movement in its various forms. See, for example, Hayward 1957; Sundkler 1961, 1976; Baëta 1962; Webster 1964; Turner 1967; Barrett 1968; Oosthuizen 1968; Peel 1968; Daneel 1987; Gifford 1991; Oosthuizen & Hexham 1992; Bediako 1995; Kitshoff 1997; Pobee& Ositelu II 1998; Anderson 2000; Jenkins 2006; Kalu 2008. 122
independent Pentecostal Churches, the renewal movements within mission denominations and the trans-national fellowships (Asamoah-Gyadu 2005:236). Outsiders usually identify PCCs with AICs, because both movements attract many African believers, distance themselves from missionary-founded churches, emphasize the work of the Holy Spirit and centralize healing and exorcism. Based on these similarities, it is hard to specify exactly the relation between AICs and PCCs. Many researchers discern a certain continuity between the AIC movement and the PCCs on the basis of their pneumatic emphasis: the AIC movement is seen as the African version of Pentecostalism (Kalu 2008:69; see also Anderson 1990:65 and Asamoah-Gyadu 2007:307). One wonders whether the general typology of African Pentecostalism as the amalgamation of AICs and PCCs is able to account for the differences between AICs and PCCs. Kalu (2008:75) elaborates on the demonization of AICs by Pentecostal Churches, which seems to be a clear signal of Pentecostal believers perceiving AIC members in a different way than researchers (and other outsiders) do. Generally, African Pentecostals are of the opinion that AICs are non- Christian and abject because of their involvement with ancestral spirits and with certain African traditional healing elements that are included in healing rituals of the faith community. Although the AIC movement and the PCC wing highly determine the faith-based healing discourse, it does not mean that only these two parties represent the phenomenon of churchbased healing. Jenkins’ statement (2007:145) that the practice of healing unifies both mainstream and independent churches in the southern hemisphere shows that the focus on healing and exorcism cannot be narrowed down to a particular ecclesiological tradition or a faith movement. In Southern Africa, there is a clear appreciation for the relation between religion, faith and health, and basically all faith communities acknowledge the meaning of this relation. 5.1.2 HIV/AIDS and church-based healing Recently the discourse on church-based healing has received more attention than previously due to the role of churches in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Researchers and policy makers have understood the need to explore how faith communities try to oppose the impact of HIV/AIDS, and to seek the cooperation of churches and other faith-based organizations, because “their unique positioning within communities and the often authoritative nature of their interaction with followers mean that they have a certain legitimacy and resulting power to change behavior” (Scorgie 2008:86, with a reference to Liebowitz 2002:10). An increasing number of publications about the role of churches in the battle against AIDS center around AIDS prevention, with attention being paid especially to changes in sexual behavior. Another topic of attention in research and policy reports is related to care and support. In other words, the meaning of the contribution of faith communities in the fight against AIDS is usually restricted to the realization 123
- Page 71 and 72: century it turned out that the medi
- Page 73 and 74: scientific insights. The rigid Enli
- Page 75 and 76: determined the course of missionary
- Page 77 and 78: exclusive and divergent therapy, th
- Page 79 and 80: merely regarded as the mirror of th
- Page 81 and 82: esearch starts (as it is in convent
- Page 83 and 84: a given society), but it should be
- Page 85 and 86: eliefs and deeds were reproduced th
- Page 87 and 88: missionary discourse focuses not on
- Page 89 and 90: The notion of transformation result
- Page 91 and 92: 3.5.3 Transformation without superi
- Page 93 and 94: The transformation of biomedicine i
- Page 95 and 96: people make sense of health and ill
- Page 97 and 98: ut should have narratives and perso
- Page 99 and 100: these, but all of them include, imp
- Page 101 and 102: Epidemiological constructions of AI
- Page 103 and 104: investigating sexual activities wit
- Page 105 and 106: within a specific society. The ackn
- Page 107 and 108: This section aims at exploring some
- Page 109 and 110: assessment and prevention. However,
- Page 111 and 112: which Jesus directly turns towards
- Page 113 and 114: include the dismissal of the assume
- Page 115 and 116: 4.4.2 Quality of social life From a
- Page 117 and 118: The church now acknowledges that it
- Page 119 and 120: ehavior, has mainly determined the
- Page 121: CHAPTER 5. CHURCH-BASED HEALING DIS
- Page 125 and 126: deficiencies in medical healthcare
- Page 127 and 128: that the human covenant partner nee
- Page 129 and 130: approach towards the cause of disea
- Page 131 and 132: Besides the argument that Jesus him
- Page 133 and 134: malevolent forces or demons, who ha
- Page 135 and 136: of benevolent spiritual forces in o
- Page 137 and 138: 5.3.3 Power of the Holy Spirit With
- Page 139 and 140: for Jesus’ holistic approach to t
- Page 141 and 142: prophet-healer is seen as someone w
- Page 143 and 144: church-based healing discourse does
- Page 145 and 146: church-based healing would be depri
- Page 147 and 148: who have to deal with a changing st
- Page 149 and 150: manifests itself, but it is definit
- Page 151 and 152: PART II. EXPLORING A REFORMED PNEUM
- Page 153 and 154: matrix? What are the essential elem
- Page 155 and 156: the work of the Spirit? What consti
- Page 157 and 158: 6.2 REFORMED PNEUMATOLOGIES The fol
- Page 159 and 160: Another feature of Calvin’s pneum
- Page 161 and 162: providence allows for a limited yet
- Page 163 and 164: meaning of the association of Word
- Page 165 and 166: Kuyper’s thought is of great impo
- Page 167 and 168: life within the old life through hi
- Page 169 and 170: physical healing is such an inactiv
- Page 171 and 172: whether the Christological focus in
that nearly every faith community <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa concedes that <strong>the</strong> church has a contribution<br />
to make to <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>and</strong> wholeness <strong>of</strong> humanity.<br />
5.1 CHURCH-BASED HEALING DISCOURSE IN GENERAL<br />
The church-based <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> discourse is, generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, l<strong>in</strong>ked to particular churches <strong>in</strong><br />
Africa: <strong>the</strong> African Instituted Churches (AICs) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal <strong>and</strong> Charismatic Churches<br />
(PCCs). After a brief description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> typology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se churches, <strong>and</strong> after focus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />
impact HIV/AIDS has had on faith <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> exorcism <strong>and</strong> deliverance is <strong>in</strong>troduced,<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce exorcism is generally considered to be <strong>the</strong> core <strong>of</strong> church-based <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> activities.<br />
5.1.1 Typology <strong>of</strong> churches<br />
What k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> churches are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> church-based <strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> discourse? Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
research trends, <strong>the</strong>re are two prom<strong>in</strong>ent ecclesiological movements that determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> discourse.<br />
The first is <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> African Instituted Churches (AIC). Depend<strong>in</strong>g on one’s<br />
perspective, <strong>the</strong> acronym AIC can also st<strong>and</strong> for African Indigenous Churches, African<br />
Independent Churches or African Initiated Churches. The AICs are churches that came <strong>in</strong>to<br />
existence at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century <strong>in</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> missionary-founded churches.<br />
They were founded <strong>and</strong> are run by Africans, who succeed <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> message <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gospel<br />
relevant to <strong>the</strong> African <strong>in</strong>digenous worldview. The AIC movement is <strong>of</strong>ten perceived as an<br />
au<strong>the</strong>ntic African expression <strong>of</strong> Christianity (see Omenyo 2000:233), because <strong>the</strong> AICs created<br />
space for certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>spirit</strong>ual or pneumatic elements that are <strong>of</strong> great importance with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> African<br />
context but that were not allowed to exist with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> missionary-founded churches. The Aladura<br />
Churches (mean<strong>in</strong>g ‘pray<strong>in</strong>g people’ <strong>in</strong> Yoruba) <strong>in</strong> West Africa, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zion/Apostolic<br />
Churches <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Africa are important representations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIC movement 30 .<br />
The explosive growth that features <strong>the</strong> AIC movement also turns out to be one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />
characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pentecostal <strong>and</strong> Charismatic Churches (PCC). The PCCs constitute <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>the</strong>me with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> faith-<strong>heal<strong>in</strong>g</strong> discourse. The Pentecostal movement can be<br />
divided <strong>in</strong>to two sub-divisions: <strong>the</strong> first one embraces <strong>the</strong> classical Pentecostal denom<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
(like, for example, <strong>the</strong> Assemblies <strong>of</strong> God), that have been present <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
<strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> twentieth century. The second sub-division is <strong>the</strong> neo-Pentecostals, <strong>the</strong> younger<br />
30. A lot has been written about <strong>the</strong> AIC movement <strong>in</strong> its various forms. See, for example, Hayward 1957; Sundkler<br />
1961, 1976; Baëta 1962; Webster 1964; Turner 1967; Barrett 1968; Oosthuizen 1968; Peel 1968; Daneel 1987;<br />
Gifford 1991; Oosthuizen & Hexham 1992; Bediako 1995; Kitsh<strong>of</strong>f 1997; Pobee& Ositelu II 1998; Anderson 2000;<br />
Jenk<strong>in</strong>s 2006; Kalu 2008.<br />
122