spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

Mainstream theology focusing on HIV/AIDS Mainstream theology has faced the same struggle as that of the Pentecostal tradition. Theological contributions to the HIV/AIDS discourse were hardly developed during the first twenty years of the pandemic, for the same reasons as were mentioned regarding the Pentecostal discourse on HIV/AIDS, namely the association of AIDS with immoral sexual behavior. After a long period of silence, mainstream churches realized there was a dire need for theological responses to what was happening in the believers’ daily life. Since the turn of the millennium, mainstream churches started to reflect on their role and mission in the context of HIV/AIDS. The pastoral theological disciplines took the lead in voicing against stigmatization of HIV-infected people, and soon other disciplines became involved in addressing the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Martha Frederiks (2008) offers a comprehensive overview of mainstream theological responses to HIV/AIDS by mapping the most important approaches or contributions of each theological discipline. The following paragraphs will highlight three theological disciplines (biblical theology, feminist theology and systematic theology), because they provide good perspectives on how people make sense of HIV/AIDS in relation to Christian faith. As Frederiks’ article indicates, the discipline of pastoral theology focuses mainly on de-stigmatization, and the field of liturgics provides only a limited number of sources, so these disciplines are not considered here. A brief look at mainstream theology and its accents, when responding to HIV/AIDS, will affirm that church and theology want to move away from stigmatization and towards promoting ‘living positively’ in the face of death. Within the field of biblical studies, Frederiks identifies various trends in dealing with HIV/AIDS from a biblical perspective. One of these is to create a link between biblical texts and HIV/AIDS, in which the Bible text articulates the emotions of anger, desperation and lamentation evoked by the pandemic. Another way of making Scripture relevant in an HIV/AIDS context is found in the link between biblical characters and HIV/AIDS, so that the biblical character provides possibilities for identification with people infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. A third trend is about the re-reading of biblical texts with people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in mind. It is worthwhile mentioning here the approach developed by Gerald West and Bongi Zengele- Nzimande (2003, 2004, 2006). Their method is to facilitate bible studies for believers at grass roots level: that is, lay people (mostly young women), who are infected by HIV, gather around Bible texts that they themselves have selected, and then apply a simplified version of critical and contextual biblical research. The key point here is that the participants always choose those texts that address their own lives. The other interesting fact is that the group usually selects texts in 110

which Jesus directly turns towards them to encourage them, or in which Jesus rejects the prevailing views of society. West (2003:339) observed that “their deep desire is for an alternative theological perspective that grants them dignity, given that the predominant theology they encounter from the church is extremely damaging to people like them”. The method developed by West and Zengele-Nzimande reveals how the emphasis has shifted: the accent is on breaking away from status quo views on HIV/AIDS, on reading Scripture in a positive way, and on being encouraged to live positively. The voices of HIV-infected people have, at last, reached the theological agenda. The same kind of focus on fullness of life is promoted by African feminist theology. African women theologians reflect on the pandemic from a gender-sensitive perspective, arguing that churches ought to develop a theology of the sacredness of life. God’s solidarity with the poor and the marginalized — the central point of feminist liberation theology — has to do with justice, restoration, hope and quality of life. Human life, including ‘infected’ life, should be protected and liberated (Phiri 2004:428). The church, therefore, has to reject a direct link between illness and sin, and has to acknowledge that infection or illness is more than a medical condition. In addition to the firm rejection of sin, guilt and female submission in the face of AIDS, various members of the Circle of Concerned African Women Theologians have generated particular responses to the AIDS pandemic by introducing concepts like ‘gender’ and ‘culture’ in their theological analyses. Specific topics like marriage as the centre of patriarchy, domestic violence and rape, cultural rites of passage, the condition of widows, and the role of the woman as the most prominent care-provider for orphans and HIV-infected people are brought to the attention of church and theology. Another example of feminist theology in the era of HIV/AIDS is the rereading of certain biblical texts from the perspective of vulnerable people and those living with HIV/AIDS. For example, the story of the persistent widow and the unwilling judge in Luke 18:1- 8 offers the chance to identify with the widow who refuses to surrender and who insists on justice; based on the image of God as the God of justice one is encouraged to persist in the context of HIV/AIDS, and to call out “grant me justice” (Dube 2004:19). In addition to the identification with biblical characters, African feminist theology develops perspectives on the identification with Christ: “The church needs to realize that today Jesus Christ stands amongst the suffering, saying, ‘Look at me, I have Aids’” (Dube 2002:538f). Justice and liberation are the main lenses through which African women’s theologies view HIV/AIDS. The destructive forces of the pandemic are mostly framed by gender inequality, social suffering, and global injustice threatening marginalized people (of whom HIV-infected women constitute the majority). HIV/AIDS is depicted as power structures that can undermine 111

which Jesus directly turns towards <strong>the</strong>m to encourage <strong>the</strong>m, or <strong>in</strong> which Jesus rejects <strong>the</strong><br />

prevail<strong>in</strong>g views <strong>of</strong> society. West (2003:339) observed that “<strong>the</strong>ir deep desire is for an alternative<br />

<strong>the</strong>ological perspective that grants <strong>the</strong>m dignity, given that <strong>the</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>the</strong>y<br />

encounter from <strong>the</strong> church is extremely damag<strong>in</strong>g to people like <strong>the</strong>m”. The method developed<br />

by West <strong>and</strong> Zengele-Nzim<strong>and</strong>e reveals how <strong>the</strong> emphasis has shifted: <strong>the</strong> accent is on break<strong>in</strong>g<br />

away from status quo views on HIV/AIDS, on read<strong>in</strong>g Scripture <strong>in</strong> a positive way, <strong>and</strong> on be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

encouraged to live positively. The voices <strong>of</strong> HIV-<strong>in</strong>fected people have, at last, reached <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ological agenda.<br />

The same k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> focus on fullness <strong>of</strong> life is promoted by African fem<strong>in</strong>ist <strong>the</strong>ology. African<br />

women <strong>the</strong>ologians reflect on <strong>the</strong> p<strong>and</strong>emic from a gender-sensitive perspective, argu<strong>in</strong>g that<br />

churches ought to develop a <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sacredness <strong>of</strong> life. God’s solidarity with <strong>the</strong> poor <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized — <strong>the</strong> central po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> fem<strong>in</strong>ist liberation <strong>the</strong>ology — has to do with justice,<br />

restoration, hope <strong>and</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> life. Human life, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ‘<strong>in</strong>fected’ life, should be protected<br />

<strong>and</strong> liberated (Phiri 2004:428). The church, <strong>the</strong>refore, has to reject a direct l<strong>in</strong>k between illness<br />

<strong>and</strong> s<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> has to acknowledge that <strong>in</strong>fection or illness is more than a medical condition. In<br />

addition to <strong>the</strong> firm rejection <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>, guilt <strong>and</strong> female submission <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> AIDS, various<br />

members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Circle <strong>of</strong> Concerned African Women Theologians have generated particular<br />

responses to <strong>the</strong> AIDS p<strong>and</strong>emic by <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g concepts like ‘gender’ <strong>and</strong> ‘culture’ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>the</strong>ological analyses. Specific topics like marriage as <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> patriarchy, domestic violence<br />

<strong>and</strong> rape, cultural rites <strong>of</strong> passage, <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> widows, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> woman as <strong>the</strong><br />

most prom<strong>in</strong>ent care-provider for orphans <strong>and</strong> HIV-<strong>in</strong>fected people are brought to <strong>the</strong> attention<br />

<strong>of</strong> church <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ology. Ano<strong>the</strong>r example <strong>of</strong> fem<strong>in</strong>ist <strong>the</strong>ology <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> era <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS is <strong>the</strong> reread<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> biblical texts from <strong>the</strong> perspective <strong>of</strong> vulnerable people <strong>and</strong> those liv<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

HIV/AIDS. For example, <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> persistent widow <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> unwill<strong>in</strong>g judge <strong>in</strong> Luke 18:1-<br />

8 <strong>of</strong>fers <strong>the</strong> chance to identify with <strong>the</strong> widow who refuses to surrender <strong>and</strong> who <strong>in</strong>sists on<br />

justice; based on <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> God as <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> justice one is encouraged to persist <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

context <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS, <strong>and</strong> to call out “grant me justice” (Dube 2004:19). In addition to <strong>the</strong><br />

identification with biblical characters, African fem<strong>in</strong>ist <strong>the</strong>ology develops perspectives on <strong>the</strong><br />

identification with Christ: “The church needs to realize that today Jesus Christ st<strong>and</strong>s amongst<br />

<strong>the</strong> suffer<strong>in</strong>g, say<strong>in</strong>g, ‘Look at me, I have Aids’” (Dube 2002:538f).<br />

Justice <strong>and</strong> liberation are <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> lenses through which African women’s <strong>the</strong>ologies view<br />

HIV/AIDS. The destructive forces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> p<strong>and</strong>emic are mostly framed by gender <strong>in</strong>equality,<br />

social suffer<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> global <strong>in</strong>justice threaten<strong>in</strong>g marg<strong>in</strong>alized people (<strong>of</strong> whom HIV-<strong>in</strong>fected<br />

women constitute <strong>the</strong> majority). HIV/AIDS is depicted as power structures that can underm<strong>in</strong>e<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!