spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State spirit and healing in africa - University of the Free State

etd.uovs.ac.za
from etd.uovs.ac.za More from this publisher
23.06.2013 Views

One major element that contributed to this growing awareness and to a more critical evaluation of the Western biomedical paradigm regarding HIV/AIDS in Africa is the so-called critical discourse analysis (CDA). Generally speaking, CDA is a tool for acquiring sharper insights into particular matters within a specific discourse that have to do with social constructions of power, domination and marginalization. It is presupposed by CDA that spoken and written words (discourse) are subjective by definition. Words can never be neutral, for they acquire their meaning within a specific historical, social and political context. The objective of CDA is to identify, clarify, and challenge the relationships that exist between the use of language and the exercise of power, in the sense of domination of the marginalized by the elite within a discourse (see Van Dijk 1993). Within the discourse on HIV/AIDS in Africa, critical discourse analysts have contributed significantly to the voicing of the unheard and marginalized people involved in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Focusing on the HIV/AIDS discourse, the CDA “analyzes the calculus of economic and symbolic power in medical rituals, critiquing the systems upon which medical exchange and meanings are built” (Jain n.d.:1). This means that CDA does not only play an important role in identifying the limitations of mainstream biomedical programs within HIV/AIDS prevention programs, but also aims to resist the social inequality produced and maintained by those who dominate the HIV/AIDS discourse financially, politically and socially. CDA research has, for example, brought to attention how the power relations within the HIV/AIDS discourse facilitate the dominant perspective by highlighting themes such as stigma, blame, racism and moralism (cf. Stillwaggon 2003; Schoepf 2004; Jain n.y.). 4.3 BEYOND EPIDEMIOLOGY ‘Beyond epidemiology’ is a term coined by Kalipeni et.al., who published an important work on HIV/AIDS in Africa from perspectives that had been largely unnoticed until then. Beyond Epidemiology (2004) is a rich collection of perspectives and research findings forming a critical addition to mainstream opinions within the discourse. The publication was instigated by the realization that the biomedical paradigm has dominated the HIV/AIDS discourse, without succeeding to stop the spread of the virus. In response to this, the trend now is to open the discourse, and to move beyond epidemiology as the determining factor to understand HIV/AIDS. By moving beyond epidemiological models of HIV/AIDS, researchers have pushed the HIV/AIDS discourse in a new direction so that it is no longer a mainly epidemiological matter; the roots of the disease are more numerous and deeper than the virus itself. ‘Beyond epidemiology’ is an expression that refers to the complex network of factors linked to each other 104

within a specific society. The acknowledgement that the existence of HIV/AIDS is not only a matter of viral transmission, but also a matter of culture, politics, economy, gender relations, poverty and globalization, is the most crucial part of the gravity shift within the discourse. The human factor in the epidemic has received increasing attention, steering the direction of the discussion towards human rights, community-based responses at a grass roots level, personal narratives of people suffering from HIV/AIDS and local understandings of HIV/AIDS. Topdown approaches, in which a selected group of people determines what is best for the majority (as in national policies and biomedical prevention programs), are being challenged by a growing number of alternative perspectives which claim that religion, local knowledge, music and empowerment play an important role in the fight against HIV/AIDS. In the following paragraphs, these ‘beyond epidemiology’ approaches will be discussed in more detail and the existence of alternative or popular explanations of HIV/AIDS will be explored in general. How do such constructions come into being, and what is the relevance of popular HIV/AIDS constructs for the ones who keep them intact? After a general introduction into nonepidemiological HIV/AIDS constructions there follows a more specific focus on the understanding of HIV/AIDS in relation to Christian faith. This link between religion and HIV/AIDS is a somewhat separate, yet important, category within the ‘beyond epidemiology’ discourse. In the African context, daily life is infused with Christian faith and church praxis. No wonder church and theology are heavily involved in the fight against HIV/AIDS, sometimes implicitly and sometimes explicitly (with all inherent matters of dispute). A focus on the relation of Christian faith and HIV/AIDS constructions (of which HIV/AIDS theologies are part) will bring about the importance and necessity of ‘beyond epidemiology’ approaches within the discourse on HIV/AIDS in Africa. 4.3.1 Social representations of HIV/AIDS The way in which people talk about illness, and how they consider the origin and spread of HIV/AIDS, has become an important area of attention within the HIV/AIDS discourse, because it reveals how people make sense of HIV/AIDS within their own frame of reference. Those who are involved in HIV prevention measures and policies may especially benefit from social science research on lay people’s perceptions and actions pertaining to HIV/AIDS in Africa. In social science jargon, the way people interpret and respond to social threats (like HIV/AIDS) is called social representation. What happens in the process of social representation is that people who belong to the same social category apply familiar concepts, ideas, and images to the social threat. For example, the social representations of HIV/AIDS by men in Southern Malawi 105

One major element that contributed to this grow<strong>in</strong>g awareness <strong>and</strong> to a more critical evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Western biomedical paradigm regard<strong>in</strong>g HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Africa is <strong>the</strong> so-called critical<br />

discourse analysis (CDA). Generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, CDA is a tool for acquir<strong>in</strong>g sharper <strong>in</strong>sights <strong>in</strong>to<br />

particular matters with<strong>in</strong> a specific discourse that have to do with social constructions <strong>of</strong> power,<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alization. It is presupposed by CDA that spoken <strong>and</strong> written words<br />

(discourse) are subjective by def<strong>in</strong>ition. Words can never be neutral, for <strong>the</strong>y acquire <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a specific historical, social <strong>and</strong> political context. The objective <strong>of</strong> CDA is to<br />

identify, clarify, <strong>and</strong> challenge <strong>the</strong> relationships that exist between <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> language <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

exercise <strong>of</strong> power, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized by <strong>the</strong> elite with<strong>in</strong> a discourse<br />

(see Van Dijk 1993).<br />

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> discourse on HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Africa, critical discourse analysts have contributed<br />

significantly to <strong>the</strong> voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unheard <strong>and</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>alized people <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fight aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

HIV/AIDS. Focus<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> HIV/AIDS discourse, <strong>the</strong> CDA “analyzes <strong>the</strong> calculus <strong>of</strong> economic<br />

<strong>and</strong> symbolic power <strong>in</strong> medical rituals, critiqu<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> systems upon which medical exchange <strong>and</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs are built” (Ja<strong>in</strong> n.d.:1). This means that CDA does not only play an important role <strong>in</strong><br />

identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>stream biomedical programs with<strong>in</strong> HIV/AIDS prevention<br />

programs, but also aims to resist <strong>the</strong> social <strong>in</strong>equality produced <strong>and</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by those who<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> HIV/AIDS discourse f<strong>in</strong>ancially, politically <strong>and</strong> socially. CDA research has, for<br />

example, brought to attention how <strong>the</strong> power relations with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> HIV/AIDS discourse facilitate<br />

<strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant perspective by highlight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mes such as stigma, blame, racism <strong>and</strong> moralism<br />

(cf. Stillwaggon 2003; Schoepf 2004; Ja<strong>in</strong> n.y.).<br />

4.3 BEYOND EPIDEMIOLOGY<br />

‘Beyond epidemiology’ is a term co<strong>in</strong>ed by Kalipeni et.al., who published an important work on<br />

HIV/AIDS <strong>in</strong> Africa from perspectives that had been largely unnoticed until <strong>the</strong>n. Beyond<br />

Epidemiology (2004) is a rich collection <strong>of</strong> perspectives <strong>and</strong> research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs form<strong>in</strong>g a critical<br />

addition to ma<strong>in</strong>stream op<strong>in</strong>ions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> discourse. The publication was <strong>in</strong>stigated by <strong>the</strong><br />

realization that <strong>the</strong> biomedical paradigm has dom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>the</strong> HIV/AIDS discourse, without<br />

succeed<strong>in</strong>g to stop <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> virus. In response to this, <strong>the</strong> trend now is to open <strong>the</strong><br />

discourse, <strong>and</strong> to move beyond epidemiology as <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g factor to underst<strong>and</strong> HIV/AIDS.<br />

By mov<strong>in</strong>g beyond epidemiological models <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS, researchers have pushed <strong>the</strong><br />

HIV/AIDS discourse <strong>in</strong> a new direction so that it is no longer a ma<strong>in</strong>ly epidemiological matter;<br />

<strong>the</strong> roots <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disease are more numerous <strong>and</strong> deeper than <strong>the</strong> virus itself. ‘Beyond<br />

epidemiology’ is an expression that refers to <strong>the</strong> complex network <strong>of</strong> factors l<strong>in</strong>ked to each o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!