22.06.2013 Views

University of Bucharest

University of Bucharest

University of Bucharest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Romanian Pidgin Arabic can be quite straightforwardly assigned to<br />

Bakker‘s (1995) work force pidgins. On the other hand, Sebba‘s (1997) typology<br />

needs to be extended so as to include a class <strong>of</strong> oil industry pidgins 17 .<br />

Another well-known typology (Mühlhäusler 1997) seeks to classify pidgin<br />

languages on purely linguistic criteria and distinguishes three developmental<br />

stages: (i) prepidgin 18 ; (ii) stable pidgin; (iii) expanded pidgin 19 . Each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

phases is characterized by a specific set <strong>of</strong> phonological, morphological, syntactic<br />

and lexical diagnostic features.<br />

Now, at various points in this paper I have noted similarities between<br />

Romanian Pidgin Arabic described and other pidgins. In the table below I<br />

compare Romanian Pidgin Arabic with three pidgin languages, generally<br />

considered to be representatives <strong>of</strong> the prepidgin stage: Russenorsk and two<br />

English-lexified pidgins, Butler English and Pacific Pidgin Englishes. The latter is<br />

a cover term for non-specified varieties <strong>of</strong> Pidgin English spoken in the Pacific in<br />

the 19th century. The table is based on data from Broch and Jahr (1981) for<br />

Russenorsk, Hosali and Aitchison (1986), Mehrotra (1999) and Hosali (2005) for<br />

Butler English, Mühlhäusler (1997), and Tryon and Charpentier (2004) for Pacific<br />

Pidgin Englishes. With one exception, the diagnostic features are those suggested<br />

by Mühlhäusler (1997). I have added ―non-productive reduplication‖, proposed by<br />

Bakker (1995 and 2003), who explicitly states that this feature is typical <strong>of</strong><br />

expanded pidgins. In the table, the sign ―+‖ shows that a feature is attested and<br />

―−‖ that it is not; the absence <strong>of</strong> relevant information is indicated by blank spaces.<br />

(29) Comparison <strong>of</strong> selected diagnostic features<br />

Feature Romanian Pidgin Russenorsk Butler Pacific Pidgin<br />

Arabic<br />

English Englishes<br />

inter-speaker variation in phonology + + + +<br />

minimal personal pronoun system + + +<br />

copula − − − −<br />

conjunctions, complementizers − −<br />

one-preposition system + + +<br />

non-productive reduplication + +<br />

multifunctionality + + + +<br />

tense and aspect markers − − − −<br />

coordination with adverb + +<br />

iconic paratactic structures + + + +<br />

small size <strong>of</strong> core vocabulary 150 150-200 NHJE 50-100<br />

SPPE 300<br />

17 To which the pidginized Gulf Arabic described by Smart (1990) could also be assigned.<br />

18 Alternative names include ―jargon‖ and ―minimal pidgin‖.<br />

19 Also called ―extended pidgin‖.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!