21.06.2013 Views

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In general, theriomorphic and therianthropic deities are accepted as a commonplace only<br />

in the context of Egyptian religion. Local and state gods often took the form of a human figure<br />

with an animal head, and these figures abound in Egyptian art. Interestingly enough, the<br />

influence of the Egyptians on the cultures of Greece and Italy has been noted in many contexts,<br />

including religion, and yet the possibility of Etruscan or Roman worship of theriomorphic and<br />

therianthropic deities is still left out of the discussion of Etruscan and Roman cult. For the<br />

Egyptians, “Animals functioned much as did cult statues, and were simply one vehicle through<br />

which the gods could make their will manifest, and through which the faithful could demonstrate<br />

their devotion to the gods.” 62 There is evidence in the religion of ancient Italy for the belief in a<br />

divine presence in the animal world, but scholarly literature primarily focuses on animals as<br />

instruments of revealing divine will. 63 Because of this, the possibility of Egyptian and other<br />

Near Eastern prototypes in the creation of the iconography of Etruscan and Roman therianthropic<br />

deities is one topic explored in this study.<br />

There are various theoretical frameworks we might apply to the myths of theriomorphic<br />

and therianthropic divinities. A useful summary and critical appraisal of these approaches<br />

appears in G.S. Kirk’s The Nature of Greek Myths, 64 and thus, such a summation need not be<br />

attempted here. Nevertheless, some relevant points bear repeating. No universal theory can<br />

wholly account for the variations present in all myths, but the relationships among nature, ritual,<br />

cult, images, and myth must be considered. Each interpretation presents the student of myth with<br />

a tool that may be used to gain insight into an individual tale, and thus I employ a selective use<br />

of mythological theory in this study. By relating theriomorphic and therianthropic gods to these<br />

various theories and examining them through different “lenses,” we can come closer to<br />

understanding these beings.<br />

The theoretical framework in which these gods have been discussed in the past may be<br />

another reason that they are not addressed in more depth in recent studies of Roman and Etruscan<br />

religion; they are associated with older, “out-dated” scholarship and ideas, such as the writings of<br />

62 Thompson 2002, 70.<br />

63 The practice of studying the flight and behavior of birds, augury, is one example of using animals to interpret the<br />

intentions of the gods. Hepatoscopy, examining the liver of a sacrificial victim, is another example of how the<br />

cosmos can be reflected in an animal. On the other hand, at least one of Horace’s poems (Ode 3.18) seems to be<br />

closer to an Egyptian standpoint, in which a god manifests itself as an animal as opposed to using the animal as an<br />

instrument. Animals sent as omens, such as the wolf wandering among the lambs without slaughtering them, are<br />

one example.<br />

64 Kirk 1974, 38-91.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!