21.06.2013 Views

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

physiognomy was discovered at Hohle Fels, in Germany. The practice of blending human and<br />

animal anatomy in a statuette such as this one is likely indicative of the recognition of a link<br />

between man and animal or the animal’s possession of similar, possibly desirable, character<br />

traits.<br />

The animal species usually represented — mammoth, bear and lion — are not<br />

ones that would have been eaten (a common feature with this early art). The<br />

postures of these figurines, and their ears and eyes, reveal a close attention paid<br />

to aggressive animal behaviour. They may be material expressions of the shared<br />

personal qualities of humans and animals, as is perhaps indicated by the small<br />

half-human, half-animal figurine from Hohle Fels, and the larger half-lion, halfhuman<br />

figurine found earlier at Hohlenstein-Stadel. Or they may be expressions<br />

of the shared social qualities of single- and group-living species. 5<br />

Statuettes such as those discussed here are evidence for the great antiquity of linking the human<br />

and animal worlds in artistic representation. As I shall demonstrate over the course of this study,<br />

the creation of hybrid creatures is not a practice limited to early human kind, and certainly not<br />

representative of so-called primitive beliefs. 6 In a classical context, human-animal hybrids were<br />

a common part of the mythological tradition: gorgons, centaurs, satyrs, sirens, and Skylla are all<br />

prominent examples of the mingling of human and bestial form, and all of these creatures<br />

possessed a monstrous aspect. These figures are considered lesser divine beings, not “proper”<br />

gods or goddesses, but some of the most influential and widely worshipped deities possessed an<br />

animal aspect as well. 7<br />

In studies of ancient classical religion and myth, it is often stated that the Greeks and<br />

Romans had gods for all occasions, and that each tree, rock, and stream was inhabited by<br />

divinities, yet scholars do not seem to apply this system to the animal world. Modern studies<br />

state that animal worship was “anathema” to the Greeks and Romans, 8 but in the related field of<br />

Egyptology, it has been noted by A. Thomas that, for early men, the animal world was<br />

representative of an order and hierarchy that implied a divine presence. 9 Man has also tended to<br />

5 Sinclair 2003, 774-5.<br />

6 In general the word “primitive” carries negative connotations. I use this word due to the content of earlier<br />

scholarship, but I do not subscribe to a model of primitive man and/or cultures. In fact, a major point of this work is<br />

to disassociate the iconography of human-animal hybrids from the idea of “primitive man.”<br />

7 Monsters (such as the Minotaur), spirits, and other lesser divinities are discussed in this dissertation at the point<br />

where their iconography is critical to an understanding of the deities and demons featured here.<br />

8 Ray 2002, 90; Leavitt 1992, 248. Some of the literary sources from Greece and Rome seem to demonstrate a<br />

stance against animal worship, and these sources will be evaluated over the course of this study.<br />

9 Thomas 1989, 11.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!