21.06.2013 Views

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

an Etruscan black figure vase from the Orvieto Group (Fig. VI.11). 627 Krauskopf suggests that<br />

this figure is an underworld demon, and its manner is certainly appropriate for a fierce denizen of<br />

the lower world. This figure possesses the head of a bird of prey, which is clear because it has a<br />

hooked beak and reaches out to attack or harry another figure on the sherd. Not enough of this<br />

vessel remains to reconstruct the narrative scene of which this demon is a part, although one<br />

might envision the punishment of Prometheus or Tityos as a likely candidates for violence<br />

committed by an avian antagonist. 628<br />

Etruscan tomb painting contains a second example of a chthonic, therianthropic bird<br />

demon. The Tomb of Orcus II preserves the only labeled example of the demon, Tuchulcha, 629<br />

and here depicted with wings, ass’ ears, a beak instead of a mouth, and two snakes rising from its<br />

head as it brandishes a third snake to menace the hero Theseus (Fig. VI.12). 630 Tuchulcha’s<br />

wings bear the same markings as the viper it 631 holds, and there can be no doubt that demon and<br />

serpent are inextricably linked; 632 nevertheless, due to the presence of a beak and wings, I have<br />

included Tuchulcha in this chapter on avians. Like the bird demon on the black figure sherd<br />

(Fig. VI.11), Tuchulcha is depicted in an offensive stance. In this case, his victim is clearly<br />

627 Not enough of this vessel is preserved to say much that is conclusive about the bird-headed figure which seems to<br />

be attacking a man. The hooked beak of this figure has led Krauskopf to identify it as an underworld demon, and<br />

this is indeed plausible. This “demon” may be a precursor to the slightly more anthropoid Tuchulcha (Fig. VI.12).<br />

A bird of prey is suitable as an underworld figure, as any predator possesses much the same characteristics related to<br />

scavenging, killing, and the consumption of other animals’ flesh. This figure also is important because it presents<br />

the possibility of a bird being more than celestial, i.e. birds can be chthonic too.<br />

628 If the bird demon attacks a figure such as Prometheus, the narrative of which he is part would not take place in<br />

the underworld. I would nevertheless argue for the chthonic character of this hybrid as most figures who serve to<br />

punish the wicked are infernal in nature, e.g., the Erinyes or Furies.<br />

629 A winged figure with two snakes sprouting from his hair that appears on an Etruscan Red Figure skyphos housed<br />

in Boston has been identified as the demon Tuchulcha by Jannot (1997, 143). Two other figures appear on this vase<br />

with the demon and have been identified as Admetus and Alcestis. The presence of an Etruscan death demon with<br />

this couple is fitting for either the parting of Alcestis or the reunion of the couple; however, the demon depicted on<br />

this skyphos neither bears a label nor possesses a bird’s beak in place of a nose. Thus it is difficult to accept this<br />

figure as Tuchulcha as it may be a representation of Charu(n), who could fulfill much the same function as his more<br />

monstrous counterpart.<br />

630 The fact that this is the only example of a demon labeled Tuchulcha leads to several problems. The first regards<br />

the gender of this figure. De Grummond (2006a, 218 ) expresses doubt as to the gender of Tuchulcha but refers to<br />

him as a he for simplicity’s sake. The color of the skin and the costume of the figure are the basis for this problem.<br />

De Ruyt (1934, 11) determines that due to a total lack of humanity, speculation in relation to Tuchulcha’s gender is<br />

ultimately moot. I shall refer to Tuchulcha as “it” to indicate its distinctly inhuman character. Jannot (1997, 144)<br />

addresses a second problem, the identity of this demon as separate from Charu(n). He suggests that Tuchulcha may<br />

be equivalent to an epithet similar to those found in the Tomba dei Caronti. I disagree with this conclusion as the<br />

features of Charu(n) and Tuchulcha are distinct enough to merit separate identities.<br />

631 De Grummond (2006, 217) indicates that the gender we should ascribe to this demon is not clear due to its skin<br />

tone, garments, and possible representation of breasts. Tuchulcha is commonly referred to as “he” in scholarly<br />

literature, but I choose to refer to this demon as an “it” due to its otherworldly nature.<br />

632 Hostetler 2003, 52.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!