21.06.2013 Views

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

Final Draft - Preview Matter - Florida State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SISPITE and demonstrates the variation in the spelling of the epithet of this aspect of Juno. The<br />

obverse of the coin was decorated with a portrait of the emperor.<br />

Juno Sospita’s representation in Roman art is thus remarkably consistent with Cicero’s<br />

description of her iconography, and yet there exists one anomalous occurrence of this goddess in<br />

Etruscan art. A small, bronze statuette of Juno Sospita wearing what seems to be a wolf-skin<br />

must be examined for its possible implications regarding the iconography of this goddess as well<br />

as other therianthropes (Fig. IV.11). 428 Perhaps, we should again return to the link between Juno<br />

and Faunus that is present through the festival of the Lupercalia. The amiculum Iunonis, the<br />

goat-skin thong used to induce fertility in maidens and matrons, creates a direct connection<br />

between Faunus and Juno. Certainly, these two deities share a concern with fertility. This link<br />

may help clarify the shift in iconographic types for this goddess; if it is possible that Faunus<br />

could don the skin of the wolf and/or the goat, the same variance may be possible for Juno<br />

Sospita. The martial nature of this aspect of Juno may be an important factor here. The wolf, as<br />

an animal associated with Mars, is appropriate for a civic goddess whose concern is to protect<br />

the state, but the wolf can also connote fertility. The same can be said of the goat, associated<br />

with Pan and his ability to strike fear into the hearts of soldiers and also the aegis worn by<br />

Athena (Fig. IV.10). Thus, the goat can be both a martial animal as well as one associated with<br />

fecundity and increase. Following the model proposed in the previous discussion of Faunus’<br />

iconography, I would speculate that Juno Sospita may have been envisioned as both a “predator”<br />

and protector.<br />

What is it about this goddess that made her so important to the people of Italy? Previous<br />

scholars have examined her iconography and the rituals associated with her worship, but these<br />

have not led to conclusive results concerning her character and sphere of influence. It is my<br />

belief that the conclusions drawn in the past have restricted this goddess and do not fully<br />

appreciate her nature. The first point to be addressed is whether Juno Sospita can be considered<br />

a chthonic goddess and if a chthonic nature rules out connections with celestial bodies, in<br />

particular the moon.<br />

In an attempt to prove that the temple found on the arx of Lanuvium was actually the<br />

temple of Juno Sospita and not a Capitolium, Galieti used the presence of beans and chickpeas as<br />

428 De Agostino (1968, 57) states that in this example, Juno wears the wolf-skin as opposed to her more usual goatskin.<br />

He also notes that her feet also lack the typical calcei repandi. See also Richardson 1983, 361.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!