October 15, 2012 - City of Laredo

October 15, 2012 - City of Laredo October 15, 2012 - City of Laredo

ci.laredo.tx.us
from ci.laredo.tx.us More from this publisher
20.06.2013 Views

11/23/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. A.R. Garza. 11/30/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig. 12/16/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig and referred to Dr. Sued for pain management. 01/10/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig. 0212 1/20 1 1 0- Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig. 04/03/20 12 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig. 06/04/2012 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig. 06/20/2012 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Garza-Vale. 0711 6/20 12 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig. 07/20/2012 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Garza-Vale. 07/23/2012 - Sgt. Flores undergoes a second MRI. MRI indicates no evidence of nerve root damage. 08/08/20 12 - City requests a Designated Doctors (DD) exam. 08/13/2012 - TMLIRP requests to DD exam from the state 0811 012012 - Dr. Martinez requests second round of steroid injections. 08/20/2012 - TASB approves second round of steroid injections. 08/30/2012 - Sgt. Flores specialist, Dr. Garza-Vale retires 09/16/2012 - Sgt. Flores follows-up with his new specialist, Dr. Gerardo Zavala, who using the same diagnostic medical information that both Dr. Puig and Dr. Garza-Vale , now recommends surgery on three different levels of Sgt. Flores lumber levels. We are currently, awaiting approval from state independent third-party reviewer TASB. 1011 9/20 12 - DD exam scheduled to be performed. Summary: Neither Sgt. Flores' primary physician, Dr. Puig, nor Sgt. Flores former neurosurgeon, Dr. Garza-Vale, had recommended surgery throughout his medical care and did not determine the cause of Sgt. Flores' symptoms of pain. . An EMG indicated an abnormal study, however a second MRI found no indication of radiculopathy due to nerve root impingement causing any type symptom. Both of Sgt. Flores treating doctors recommended conservative medical care consisting of medication, physical therapy and steroidal injections. Dr. Garza-Vale subsequently retired and Sgt. Flores started seeing a new neurosurgeon, Dr. Zavala, now recommends surgery based on the same medical information. The City, thru, TMLIRP, has requested a designated doctor's (DD) examination, which is scheduled for October 19,2012. Based on the aforementioned, staff recommends an extension of 90 days, enough time for either surgery to be approved by TASB or the state appointed Designated Doctors to address maximum medical improvement, impairment rating and ability to return to work based on all medical information. If the DD indicates the Sgt. Flores is unable to return to work the City will need to extend injury leave at that time if necessary.

Employee . . . . . . . . Authorized position/auth Actual position number Authorized Dp/Dv/Act . . Actual Dp/Dv/~ct . . . Employee status . . . . Full time/Part time . . Date of hire . . . . . . Total service date . . . Longevity date . . . . . Pay frequency ..... Scheduled hours . . . . Percent Project Expense Distribution 100.000 101-2366-521.11-10 Press Enter to continue. CITY OF LAREDO Employee Status Information FLORES, ERNEST0 X POLICE SERGEANT POLICE SERGEANT POLICE/PATROL DIVISION/PU POLICE/PATROL DIVISION/PU REGULAR F=Full time, P=Part time 19 Years 1 Months 19 Years 1 Months 0 Years 0 Months BI-WEEKLY Bi-weekly monday-friday 8 BW Bottom

11/23/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. A.R. Garza.<br />

11/30/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig.<br />

12/16/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig and referred to Dr. Sued for pain management.<br />

01/10/2011 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig.<br />

0212 1/20 1 1 0- Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig.<br />

04/03/20 12 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig.<br />

06/04/<strong>2012</strong> - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig.<br />

06/20/<strong>2012</strong> - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Garza-Vale.<br />

0711 6/20 12 - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Puig.<br />

07/20/<strong>2012</strong> - Sgt. Flores is examined by Dr. Garza-Vale.<br />

07/23/<strong>2012</strong> - Sgt. Flores undergoes a second MRI. MRI indicates no evidence <strong>of</strong> nerve root damage.<br />

08/08/20 12 - <strong>City</strong> requests a Designated Doctors (DD) exam.<br />

08/13/<strong>2012</strong> - TMLIRP requests to DD exam from the state<br />

0811 01<strong>2012</strong> - Dr. Martinez requests second round <strong>of</strong> steroid injections.<br />

08/20/<strong>2012</strong> - TASB approves second round <strong>of</strong> steroid injections.<br />

08/30/<strong>2012</strong> - Sgt. Flores specialist, Dr. Garza-Vale retires<br />

09/16/<strong>2012</strong> - Sgt. Flores follows-up with his new specialist, Dr. Gerardo Zavala, who using the same<br />

diagnostic medical information that both Dr. Puig and Dr. Garza-Vale , now recommends surgery on<br />

three different levels <strong>of</strong> Sgt. Flores lumber levels. We are currently, awaiting approval from state<br />

independent third-party reviewer TASB.<br />

1011 9/20 12 - DD exam scheduled to be performed.<br />

Summary:<br />

Neither Sgt. Flores' primary physician, Dr. Puig, nor Sgt. Flores former neurosurgeon, Dr. Garza-Vale,<br />

had recommended surgery throughout his medical care and did not determine the cause <strong>of</strong> Sgt. Flores'<br />

symptoms <strong>of</strong> pain. . An EMG indicated an abnormal study, however a second MRI found no indication<br />

<strong>of</strong> radiculopathy due to nerve root impingement causing any type symptom. Both <strong>of</strong> Sgt. Flores treating<br />

doctors recommended conservative medical care consisting <strong>of</strong> medication, physical therapy and steroidal<br />

injections. Dr. Garza-Vale subsequently retired and Sgt. Flores started seeing a new neurosurgeon, Dr.<br />

Zavala, now recommends surgery based on the same medical information.<br />

The <strong>City</strong>, thru, TMLIRP, has requested a designated doctor's (DD) examination, which is scheduled for<br />

<strong>October</strong> 19,<strong>2012</strong>. Based on the aforementioned, staff recommends an extension <strong>of</strong> 90 days, enough time<br />

for either surgery to be approved by TASB or the state appointed Designated Doctors to address<br />

maximum medical improvement, impairment rating and ability to return to work based on all medical<br />

information. If the DD indicates the Sgt. Flores is unable to return to work the <strong>City</strong> will need to extend<br />

injury leave at that time if necessary.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!