COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

worldlibrary.sg
from worldlibrary.sg More from this publisher
20.06.2013 Views

DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 731 nature, or notice the vivid burning of the flame. Hales had 110 idea of the importance of the substance he had prepared. The vivid evolution of light in bodies burning in oxygen, and its properties, were, as many persons maintain, discovered independently by Priestley in 1772-1774, by Scheele in 1774-1775, and by Lavoisier and Trudainc in 1775.* The dawn of pneumatic chemistry has been touched upon in these pages, with respect to its historical relations, because, like the feeble beginning of electrical science, it prepared the way for those grand views regarding the constitution of the atmosphere and its meteorological changes, which were mani- fested in the following century. The idea of specifically distinct gases was never perfectly clear to those who, in the seventeeth century, produced these gases. The difference between atmospheric air and the irrespirable light-extinguishing or inflammable gases, was now again exclusively ascribed to the admixture of certain vapours. Black and Cavendish first showed, in 1766, that carbonic acid (fixed air) and hydrogen (combustible air), are specifically different aeri- form fluids. So long did the ancient belief of the elementary simplicity of the atmosphere check all progress of knowledge. The final knowledge of the chemical composition of the atmosphere, acquired by means of the delicate discrimination of its quantitative relations, by the beautiful researches of Boussingault and Dumas, is one of the brilliant points of modern meteorology. The extension of physical and chemical knowledge, which we have here briefly sketched, could not fail to exercise an influence on the earliest development of geognosy. A great number of the geognostie questions, with the solution of which our own age has been occupied, were put forth by a man of the most comprehensive acquirements, the great Danish anatomist, Nicolaus Steno (Stenson), in the service of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinand II. ; by another physician, Martin Lister, an Englishman, and by Hobert Hooke, the " worthy rival" of Newton.f Of Steno's ser- * Priestley's last complaint of that which " Lavoisier is considered to have appropriated to himself," is put forth in his little memoir entitled, " The Doctrine of Phlogiston established" 1800, p. 43. j* Sir John Herschel, Discourse on the Study of Natural Philoso* phy. p. 116.

732 COSMOS. vices in the geognosy of position I have treated more circumstantially in another work.* Leonardo da Vinci, towards the close of the fifteenth century, (probably when he was planning the canals in Lombardy, which intersect the alluvial and tertiary formations,) Frascastoro, in 1517, on the occasion of the accidental exposure of rocky strata, containing fossil fishes, at Monte Bolca, near Verona, and Bernard Palissy, in his investigations regarding fountains, in 1563, had indeed recognised the existence of traces of an earlier oceanic animal world. Leonardo, as if with a presentiment of a more philosophical classification of animal forms, terms " conchylia animali die hanno I'ossa di fuora" Steno, in his work on the substances contained in rocks, (de Solido intra Solidum naturaliter contento,) distinguishes (1669) between (primitive?) rocky strata which have become solidified before the creation of plants and animals, and, therefore, contain no organic remains, and sedimentary strata (turbidi maris sedimenta sibi invicem imposita) which alternate with one another, and cover the first-named strata. All fossiliferous strata were originally deposited in horizontal beds. This inclination (or fall) has been occasioned partly by the eruption of subterranean vapours, generated by central heat (ignis in medio terra) and partly by the giving way of the feebly supported lower strata. f The valleys are the result of this falling in." Steno's theory of the formation of valleys is that of Deluc, whilst Leonardo da Vinci, like Cuvier, regards the valleys as the former beds of streams. 'j In the geognostic character of the soil of Tuscany, Steno recognised convul- sions which must, in his opinion, be ascribed to six great natural epochs. (Sex suiit distinct^} Etrurire facies ex prsesenti facie Etruria3 collecta3.) The sea had broken in at six successive periods, and after continuing to cover the interior of the land for a long time, had retired within its ancient limits. All petrefactions were not, however, according to * Humboldt, Essai geognostique sur le Gisement des Roches dans les deux Hemispheres, 1823, p. 38. f Steno de Solido intra Solidum naturaliter contento, 1669, pp. 2, 17, 28, 63, and 69 (fig. 20-25). t Venturi, Essai sur les Ouvrages physico-mathematiques de Leo nard de Vinci, 1797, 5, No. 124.

DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 731<br />

nature, or notice the vivid burning of the flame. Hales<br />

had 110 idea of the importance of the substance he had prepared.<br />

The vivid evolution of light in bodies burning in oxygen,<br />

and its properties, were, as many persons maintain, discovered<br />

independently by Priestley in 1772-1774, by Scheele<br />

in 1774-1775, and by Lavoisier and Trudainc in 1775.*<br />

The dawn of pneumatic chemistry has been touched upon<br />

in these pages, with respect to its historical relations, because,<br />

like the feeble beginning of electrical science, it prepared the<br />

way for those grand views regarding the constitution of the<br />

atmosphere and its meteorological changes,<br />

which were mani-<br />

fested in the following century. The idea of specifically<br />

distinct gases was never perfectly clear to those who, in the<br />

seventeeth century, produced these gases. The difference<br />

between atmospheric air and the irrespirable light-extinguishing<br />

or inflammable gases, was now again exclusively ascribed<br />

to the admixture of certain vapours. Black and Cavendish<br />

first showed, in 1766, that carbonic acid (fixed air) and<br />

hydrogen (combustible air), are specifically<br />

different aeri-<br />

form fluids. So long did the ancient belief of the elementary<br />

simplicity of the atmosphere check all progress of knowledge.<br />

The final knowledge of the chemical composition of<br />

the atmosphere, acquired by means of the delicate discrimination<br />

of its quantitative relations, by the beautiful researches<br />

of Boussingault and Dumas, is one of the brilliant points of<br />

modern meteorology.<br />

The extension of physical and chemical knowledge, which<br />

we have here briefly sketched, could not fail to exercise an<br />

influence on the earliest development of geognosy. A great<br />

number of the geognostie questions, with the solution of<br />

which our own age has been occupied, were put forth by a<br />

man of the most comprehensive acquirements, the great<br />

Danish anatomist, Nicolaus Steno (Stenson), in the service<br />

of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinand <strong>II</strong>. ; by another<br />

physician, Martin Lister, an Englishman, and by Hobert<br />

Hooke, the " worthy rival" of Newton.f Of Steno's ser-<br />

* Priestley's last complaint of that which " Lavoisier is considered to<br />

have appropriated to himself," is put forth in his little memoir entitled,<br />

" The Doctrine of Phlogiston established" 1800, p. 43.<br />

j* Sir John Herschel, Discourse on the Study of Natural Philoso*<br />

phy. p. 116.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!