COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library
COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library
DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 731 nature, or notice the vivid burning of the flame. Hales had 110 idea of the importance of the substance he had prepared. The vivid evolution of light in bodies burning in oxygen, and its properties, were, as many persons maintain, discovered independently by Priestley in 1772-1774, by Scheele in 1774-1775, and by Lavoisier and Trudainc in 1775.* The dawn of pneumatic chemistry has been touched upon in these pages, with respect to its historical relations, because, like the feeble beginning of electrical science, it prepared the way for those grand views regarding the constitution of the atmosphere and its meteorological changes, which were mani- fested in the following century. The idea of specifically distinct gases was never perfectly clear to those who, in the seventeeth century, produced these gases. The difference between atmospheric air and the irrespirable light-extinguishing or inflammable gases, was now again exclusively ascribed to the admixture of certain vapours. Black and Cavendish first showed, in 1766, that carbonic acid (fixed air) and hydrogen (combustible air), are specifically different aeri- form fluids. So long did the ancient belief of the elementary simplicity of the atmosphere check all progress of knowledge. The final knowledge of the chemical composition of the atmosphere, acquired by means of the delicate discrimination of its quantitative relations, by the beautiful researches of Boussingault and Dumas, is one of the brilliant points of modern meteorology. The extension of physical and chemical knowledge, which we have here briefly sketched, could not fail to exercise an influence on the earliest development of geognosy. A great number of the geognostie questions, with the solution of which our own age has been occupied, were put forth by a man of the most comprehensive acquirements, the great Danish anatomist, Nicolaus Steno (Stenson), in the service of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinand II. ; by another physician, Martin Lister, an Englishman, and by Hobert Hooke, the " worthy rival" of Newton.f Of Steno's ser- * Priestley's last complaint of that which " Lavoisier is considered to have appropriated to himself," is put forth in his little memoir entitled, " The Doctrine of Phlogiston established" 1800, p. 43. j* Sir John Herschel, Discourse on the Study of Natural Philoso* phy. p. 116.
732 COSMOS. vices in the geognosy of position I have treated more circumstantially in another work.* Leonardo da Vinci, towards the close of the fifteenth century, (probably when he was planning the canals in Lombardy, which intersect the alluvial and tertiary formations,) Frascastoro, in 1517, on the occasion of the accidental exposure of rocky strata, containing fossil fishes, at Monte Bolca, near Verona, and Bernard Palissy, in his investigations regarding fountains, in 1563, had indeed recognised the existence of traces of an earlier oceanic animal world. Leonardo, as if with a presentiment of a more philosophical classification of animal forms, terms " conchylia animali die hanno I'ossa di fuora" Steno, in his work on the substances contained in rocks, (de Solido intra Solidum naturaliter contento,) distinguishes (1669) between (primitive?) rocky strata which have become solidified before the creation of plants and animals, and, therefore, contain no organic remains, and sedimentary strata (turbidi maris sedimenta sibi invicem imposita) which alternate with one another, and cover the first-named strata. All fossiliferous strata were originally deposited in horizontal beds. This inclination (or fall) has been occasioned partly by the eruption of subterranean vapours, generated by central heat (ignis in medio terra) and partly by the giving way of the feebly supported lower strata. f The valleys are the result of this falling in." Steno's theory of the formation of valleys is that of Deluc, whilst Leonardo da Vinci, like Cuvier, regards the valleys as the former beds of streams. 'j In the geognostic character of the soil of Tuscany, Steno recognised convul- sions which must, in his opinion, be ascribed to six great natural epochs. (Sex suiit distinct^} Etrurire facies ex prsesenti facie Etruria3 collecta3.) The sea had broken in at six successive periods, and after continuing to cover the interior of the land for a long time, had retired within its ancient limits. All petrefactions were not, however, according to * Humboldt, Essai geognostique sur le Gisement des Roches dans les deux Hemispheres, 1823, p. 38. f Steno de Solido intra Solidum naturaliter contento, 1669, pp. 2, 17, 28, 63, and 69 (fig. 20-25). t Venturi, Essai sur les Ouvrages physico-mathematiques de Leo nard de Vinci, 1797, 5, No. 124.
- Page 335 and 336: 680 COSMOS. feelings of those natio
- Page 337 and 338: 682 COSMOS. age of astronomy and ma
- Page 339 and 340: 684 COSMOS. Waisselrode of Allen, b
- Page 341 and 342: 686 COSMOS. the ideal links which c
- Page 343 and 344: 688 COSMOS. ignorant of all mathema
- Page 345 and 346: 690 COSMOS. the mathematical knowle
- Page 347 and 348: 692 COSMOS. quainted with the views
- Page 349 and 350: 694 COSMOS. fixed in a central poin
- Page 351 and 352: 696 COSMOS. tion of the apparent re
- Page 353 and 354: 698 COSMOS. of the world now appear
- Page 355 and 356: 700 COSMOS. Laprey in the important
- Page 357 and 358: 702 COSMOS. he first directed towar
- Page 359 and 360: 704 COSMOS. The knowledge of Jupite
- Page 361 and 362: 706 COSMOS. 1610, Galileo informed
- Page 363 and 364: 708 COSMOS. descent lime-ball appea
- Page 365 and 366: 710 COSMOS. cised a happy influence
- Page 367 and 368: 712 COSMOS. not on actual observati
- Page 369 and 370: 714 COSMOS, The use of the telescop
- Page 371 and 372: 716 COSMOS. understanding of its or
- Page 373 and 374: 718 COSMOS. the inflections of the
- Page 375 and 376: 720 COSMOS. observed at the magneti
- Page 377 and 378: 722 COSMOS. mometer, and the ration
- Page 379 and 380: 724 cosmos. more correct view was t
- Page 381 and 382: 726 COSMOS. 1600, under the title o
- Page 383 and 384: 728 COSMOS. perature, the alternati
- Page 385: 730 COSMOS. Men had now discovered
- Page 389 and 390: 734 CCSMOS. ancient inundations (ei
- Page 391 and 392: 736 COSMOS. The decrease of gravity
- Page 393 and 394: 738 RETROSPECT OF THE EPOCHS THAT H
- Page 395 and 396: 740 COSMOS. once explored, the numb
- Page 397 and 398: 742 COSMOS. If art may be said to d
- Page 399 and 400: 639; accidents which led to the nam
- Page 401 and 402: Cassius, Mount, the probable ' ambe
- Page 403 and 404: L El Tstachri, Arabian geographer,
- Page 405 and 406: L the satellites of Jupiter, 703; o
- Page 407 and 408: lack Asiatic races, 531; on the inc
- Page 409 and 410: Oxygen and its properties, first no
- Page 411 and 412: of mountains in early Italian lands
- Page 413 and 414: L Yemen, its natural products, 573
- Page 415: The End. World Public Library Assoc
DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 731<br />
nature, or notice the vivid burning of the flame. Hales<br />
had 110 idea of the importance of the substance he had prepared.<br />
The vivid evolution of light in bodies burning in oxygen,<br />
and its properties, were, as many persons maintain, discovered<br />
independently by Priestley in 1772-1774, by Scheele<br />
in 1774-1775, and by Lavoisier and Trudainc in 1775.*<br />
The dawn of pneumatic chemistry has been touched upon<br />
in these pages, with respect to its historical relations, because,<br />
like the feeble beginning of electrical science, it prepared the<br />
way for those grand views regarding the constitution of the<br />
atmosphere and its meteorological changes,<br />
which were mani-<br />
fested in the following century. The idea of specifically<br />
distinct gases was never perfectly clear to those who, in the<br />
seventeeth century, produced these gases. The difference<br />
between atmospheric air and the irrespirable light-extinguishing<br />
or inflammable gases, was now again exclusively ascribed<br />
to the admixture of certain vapours. Black and Cavendish<br />
first showed, in 1766, that carbonic acid (fixed air) and<br />
hydrogen (combustible air), are specifically<br />
different aeri-<br />
form fluids. So long did the ancient belief of the elementary<br />
simplicity of the atmosphere check all progress of knowledge.<br />
The final knowledge of the chemical composition of<br />
the atmosphere, acquired by means of the delicate discrimination<br />
of its quantitative relations, by the beautiful researches<br />
of Boussingault and Dumas, is one of the brilliant points of<br />
modern meteorology.<br />
The extension of physical and chemical knowledge, which<br />
we have here briefly sketched, could not fail to exercise an<br />
influence on the earliest development of geognosy. A great<br />
number of the geognostie questions, with the solution of<br />
which our own age has been occupied, were put forth by a<br />
man of the most comprehensive acquirements, the great<br />
Danish anatomist, Nicolaus Steno (Stenson), in the service<br />
of the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Ferdinand <strong>II</strong>. ; by another<br />
physician, Martin Lister, an Englishman, and by Hobert<br />
Hooke, the " worthy rival" of Newton.f Of Steno's ser-<br />
* Priestley's last complaint of that which " Lavoisier is considered to<br />
have appropriated to himself," is put forth in his little memoir entitled,<br />
" The Doctrine of Phlogiston established" 1800, p. 43.<br />
j* Sir John Herschel, Discourse on the Study of Natural Philoso*<br />
phy. p. 116.