COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

worldlibrary.sg
from worldlibrary.sg More from this publisher
20.06.2013 Views

DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 707 possess only very obscure and discrepant data on this subject. It is probable that he recognised the solar spots in April 1611, for he showed them publicly at Rome in Cardinal Bandini's garden on the Quirinal, in the months of April and May of that year. Hariot, to whom Baron Zach ascribes the discovery of the sun's spots, (16th of January, 1610), certainly saw three of them on the 8th of December, 1610, and noted them down in a register of observations but he was ; ignorant that they were solar spots ; thus, too, Flamstead, on the 23rd of December, 1690, and Tobias Mayer, on the 25th of Septem- ber, 1756, did not recognise Uranus as a planet when it passed across the field of their telescope. Hariot first observed the solar spots on the 1st of December, 1611, five months, therefore, after Fabricius had published his discovery. Galileo had made the observation that the " solar spots, many of which are larger than the Mediterranean, or even than Africa and Asia," form a definite zone on the sun's disk. He occasionally noticed the same spots return, and he was convinced that they belonged to the sun itself. Their differences of dimension in the centre of the sun, and, when they disappeared on the sun's edge, especially attracted his attention, but still I find nothing in his second remarkable letter of the 14th of August, 1612, to Marcus Welser, that would indicate his having observed an inequality in the ash-coloured margin on both sides of the black nucleus when approaching the sun's edge (Alexander Wilson's accurate observation in 1773). The Canon Tarde, in 1620, and Malapertus in 1633, ascribed all obscurations of the sun to small cosmical bodies revolving around it and intercepting its light, and named the Bourbon and Austrian stars* (Borbonia et Austriaca Sidera). Fabricius recognised, like Galileo, that the spots belonged to the sun itself;f he also noticed that the spots he had seen vanish all re-appear; and the observation of these phenomena taught him the rotation of the sun, which had already been conjectured by Kepler before the discovery of the solar spots. The most accurate determinations of the period of rotation were, however, made in 1630, by the diligent Scheiner. Since the strongest light ever produced by man, Drummond's incan- * Delambe, Hist, de VAstronomie moderne, t. i. p. 690. f The same opinion is expressed in Galileo's Letters to Prince Cesi (May 25, 1612); Venturi, P.i. p. 172. 2 z2

708 COSMOS. descent lime-ball appears inky black when thrown on the sun's disk, we cannot wonder that Galileo, who undoubtedly, first described the great solar faculce, should have regarded the light of the nucleus of the sun's spots as more intense than that of the full moon, or the atmosphere near the sun's disk.* Fanciful conjectures regarding the many envelopes of air, clouds, and light, which surround the black earth-like nucleus of the sun, may be found, in the writings of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, as early as the middle of the fifteenth century, f To close our consideration of the cycle of remarkable discoveries which scarcely comprised two years, and in which the great and undying name of the Florentine shines preeminent, it still remains for us to notice the observation of the phases of Venus. In February 1610, Galileo observed the cresoentic form of this planet, and, on the llth of December, 1610, in accordance with a practice already alluded to, he concealed this important discovery in an anagram, of which Kepler makes mention in the preface to his Dioptrica. "We learn also, from a letter of his to Benedetto Castelli (30th of December, 1610), that he believed, notwithstanding the low magnifying power of his telescope, that he could recognise changes in the illumined disk of Mars. The discovery of the moon-like or crescent shape of Venus was the triumph of the Copernican system. The founder of that sys- tem could scarcely fail to recognise the necessity of the existence of these phases ; and, we find, that he discusses circumstantially, in the tenth chapter of his first book, the doubts which the more modern adherents of the Platonic opinions advance against the Ptolemaic system on account of these phases. But, in the development of his own system, he does not speak expressly of the phases of Venus, as is stated by Thomas Smith in his Optics. The enlargement of cosmical knowledge, whose description cannot, unhappily, be wholly separated from unpleasant dissensions regarding the right of priority to discoveries, excited, * See some ingenious and interesting considerations on this subject by Arago, in the Annuaire pour Van 1842, pp. 481-488. Sir John 334, speaks of the experiments with Herschel, in his Astronomy, . Drummond's light projected on the sun's disk. f Giordano Bruno und Nic. von Cusa vergliclien, von J. Clemens, 1847, s. 101. On the phases of Venus, see Galilei, Opere, t. ii. p. 53, and Kelli, Vita, vol. i. pp. 213-215.

DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 707<br />

possess only very obscure and discrepant data on this subject.<br />

It is probable that he recognised the solar spots in April<br />

1611, for he showed them publicly at Rome in Cardinal Bandini's<br />

garden on the Quirinal, in the months of April and May<br />

of that year. Hariot, to whom Baron Zach ascribes the discovery<br />

of the sun's spots, (16th of January, 1610), certainly saw<br />

three of them on the 8th of December, 1610, and noted them<br />

down in a register<br />

of observations but he was ;<br />

ignorant that<br />

they were solar spots ; thus, too, Flamstead, on the 23rd of<br />

December, 1690, and Tobias Mayer, on the 25th of Septem-<br />

ber, 1756, did not recognise Uranus as a planet when it<br />

passed across the field of their telescope. Hariot first observed<br />

the solar spots on the 1st of December, 1611, five months,<br />

therefore, after Fabricius had published his discovery.<br />

Galileo<br />

had made the observation that the<br />

"<br />

solar spots, many of<br />

which are larger than the Mediterranean, or even than Africa<br />

and Asia," form a definite zone on the sun's disk. He occasionally<br />

noticed the same spots return, and he was convinced<br />

that they belonged to the sun itself. Their differences of<br />

dimension in the centre of the sun, and, when they disappeared<br />

on the sun's edge, especially attracted his attention,<br />

but still I find nothing in his second remarkable letter of the<br />

14th of August, 1612, to Marcus Welser, that would indicate<br />

his having observed an inequality in the ash-coloured margin<br />

on both sides of the black nucleus when approaching the sun's<br />

edge (Alexander Wilson's accurate observation in 1773). The<br />

Canon Tarde, in 1620, and Malapertus in 1633, ascribed all<br />

obscurations of the sun to small cosmical bodies revolving<br />

around it and intercepting its light, and named the Bourbon<br />

and Austrian stars* (Borbonia et Austriaca Sidera). Fabricius<br />

recognised, like Galileo, that the spots belonged to the<br />

sun itself;f he also noticed that the spots he had seen vanish<br />

all re-appear; and the observation of these phenomena taught<br />

him the rotation of the sun, which had already been conjectured<br />

by Kepler before the discovery of the solar spots. The<br />

most accurate determinations of the period of rotation were,<br />

however, made in 1630, by the diligent Scheiner. Since the<br />

strongest light ever produced by man, Drummond's incan-<br />

* Delambe, Hist, de VAstronomie moderne, t. i. p. 690.<br />

f The same opinion is expressed in Galileo's Letters to Prince Cesi<br />

(May 25, 1612); Venturi, P.i. p. 172.<br />

2 z2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!