COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library
COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library
DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 707 possess only very obscure and discrepant data on this subject. It is probable that he recognised the solar spots in April 1611, for he showed them publicly at Rome in Cardinal Bandini's garden on the Quirinal, in the months of April and May of that year. Hariot, to whom Baron Zach ascribes the discovery of the sun's spots, (16th of January, 1610), certainly saw three of them on the 8th of December, 1610, and noted them down in a register of observations but he was ; ignorant that they were solar spots ; thus, too, Flamstead, on the 23rd of December, 1690, and Tobias Mayer, on the 25th of Septem- ber, 1756, did not recognise Uranus as a planet when it passed across the field of their telescope. Hariot first observed the solar spots on the 1st of December, 1611, five months, therefore, after Fabricius had published his discovery. Galileo had made the observation that the " solar spots, many of which are larger than the Mediterranean, or even than Africa and Asia," form a definite zone on the sun's disk. He occasionally noticed the same spots return, and he was convinced that they belonged to the sun itself. Their differences of dimension in the centre of the sun, and, when they disappeared on the sun's edge, especially attracted his attention, but still I find nothing in his second remarkable letter of the 14th of August, 1612, to Marcus Welser, that would indicate his having observed an inequality in the ash-coloured margin on both sides of the black nucleus when approaching the sun's edge (Alexander Wilson's accurate observation in 1773). The Canon Tarde, in 1620, and Malapertus in 1633, ascribed all obscurations of the sun to small cosmical bodies revolving around it and intercepting its light, and named the Bourbon and Austrian stars* (Borbonia et Austriaca Sidera). Fabricius recognised, like Galileo, that the spots belonged to the sun itself;f he also noticed that the spots he had seen vanish all re-appear; and the observation of these phenomena taught him the rotation of the sun, which had already been conjectured by Kepler before the discovery of the solar spots. The most accurate determinations of the period of rotation were, however, made in 1630, by the diligent Scheiner. Since the strongest light ever produced by man, Drummond's incan- * Delambe, Hist, de VAstronomie moderne, t. i. p. 690. f The same opinion is expressed in Galileo's Letters to Prince Cesi (May 25, 1612); Venturi, P.i. p. 172. 2 z2
708 COSMOS. descent lime-ball appears inky black when thrown on the sun's disk, we cannot wonder that Galileo, who undoubtedly, first described the great solar faculce, should have regarded the light of the nucleus of the sun's spots as more intense than that of the full moon, or the atmosphere near the sun's disk.* Fanciful conjectures regarding the many envelopes of air, clouds, and light, which surround the black earth-like nucleus of the sun, may be found, in the writings of Cardinal Nicholas of Cusa, as early as the middle of the fifteenth century, f To close our consideration of the cycle of remarkable discoveries which scarcely comprised two years, and in which the great and undying name of the Florentine shines preeminent, it still remains for us to notice the observation of the phases of Venus. In February 1610, Galileo observed the cresoentic form of this planet, and, on the llth of December, 1610, in accordance with a practice already alluded to, he concealed this important discovery in an anagram, of which Kepler makes mention in the preface to his Dioptrica. "We learn also, from a letter of his to Benedetto Castelli (30th of December, 1610), that he believed, notwithstanding the low magnifying power of his telescope, that he could recognise changes in the illumined disk of Mars. The discovery of the moon-like or crescent shape of Venus was the triumph of the Copernican system. The founder of that sys- tem could scarcely fail to recognise the necessity of the existence of these phases ; and, we find, that he discusses circumstantially, in the tenth chapter of his first book, the doubts which the more modern adherents of the Platonic opinions advance against the Ptolemaic system on account of these phases. But, in the development of his own system, he does not speak expressly of the phases of Venus, as is stated by Thomas Smith in his Optics. The enlargement of cosmical knowledge, whose description cannot, unhappily, be wholly separated from unpleasant dissensions regarding the right of priority to discoveries, excited, * See some ingenious and interesting considerations on this subject by Arago, in the Annuaire pour Van 1842, pp. 481-488. Sir John 334, speaks of the experiments with Herschel, in his Astronomy, . Drummond's light projected on the sun's disk. f Giordano Bruno und Nic. von Cusa vergliclien, von J. Clemens, 1847, s. 101. On the phases of Venus, see Galilei, Opere, t. ii. p. 53, and Kelli, Vita, vol. i. pp. 213-215.
- Page 311 and 312: 656 COSMOS. oceanic enterprises con
- Page 313 and 314: 658 COSMOS. were continually beset
- Page 315 and 316: 660 COSMOS. in the atmosphere, and
- Page 317 and 318: 662 COSMOS. currents which traverse
- Page 319 and 320: 364 COSMOS. The important era of ge
- Page 321 and 322: 666 COSMOS. Nubecula major may be a
- Page 323 and 324: 668 COSMOS. plied, and as Christian
- Page 325 and 326: 670 COSMOS. ous with the extension
- Page 327 and 328: 672 COSMOS. like unto a prophetic v
- Page 329 and 330: 674 COSMOS. stance of its appearing
- Page 331 and 332: 676 COSMOS. closely bears upon the
- Page 333 and 334: , were < 678 COSMOS. and the improv
- Page 335 and 336: 680 COSMOS. feelings of those natio
- Page 337 and 338: 682 COSMOS. age of astronomy and ma
- Page 339 and 340: 684 COSMOS. Waisselrode of Allen, b
- Page 341 and 342: 686 COSMOS. the ideal links which c
- Page 343 and 344: 688 COSMOS. ignorant of all mathema
- Page 345 and 346: 690 COSMOS. the mathematical knowle
- Page 347 and 348: 692 COSMOS. quainted with the views
- Page 349 and 350: 694 COSMOS. fixed in a central poin
- Page 351 and 352: 696 COSMOS. tion of the apparent re
- Page 353 and 354: 698 COSMOS. of the world now appear
- Page 355 and 356: 700 COSMOS. Laprey in the important
- Page 357 and 358: 702 COSMOS. he first directed towar
- Page 359 and 360: 704 COSMOS. The knowledge of Jupite
- Page 361: 706 COSMOS. 1610, Galileo informed
- Page 365 and 366: 710 COSMOS. cised a happy influence
- Page 367 and 368: 712 COSMOS. not on actual observati
- Page 369 and 370: 714 COSMOS, The use of the telescop
- Page 371 and 372: 716 COSMOS. understanding of its or
- Page 373 and 374: 718 COSMOS. the inflections of the
- Page 375 and 376: 720 COSMOS. observed at the magneti
- Page 377 and 378: 722 COSMOS. mometer, and the ration
- Page 379 and 380: 724 cosmos. more correct view was t
- Page 381 and 382: 726 COSMOS. 1600, under the title o
- Page 383 and 384: 728 COSMOS. perature, the alternati
- Page 385 and 386: 730 COSMOS. Men had now discovered
- Page 387 and 388: 732 COSMOS. vices in the geognosy o
- Page 389 and 390: 734 CCSMOS. ancient inundations (ei
- Page 391 and 392: 736 COSMOS. The decrease of gravity
- Page 393 and 394: 738 RETROSPECT OF THE EPOCHS THAT H
- Page 395 and 396: 740 COSMOS. once explored, the numb
- Page 397 and 398: 742 COSMOS. If art may be said to d
- Page 399 and 400: 639; accidents which led to the nam
- Page 401 and 402: Cassius, Mount, the probable ' ambe
- Page 403 and 404: L El Tstachri, Arabian geographer,
- Page 405 and 406: L the satellites of Jupiter, 703; o
- Page 407 and 408: lack Asiatic races, 531; on the inc
- Page 409 and 410: Oxygen and its properties, first no
- Page 411 and 412: of mountains in early Italian lands
DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 707<br />
possess only very obscure and discrepant data on this subject.<br />
It is probable that he recognised the solar spots in April<br />
1611, for he showed them publicly at Rome in Cardinal Bandini's<br />
garden on the Quirinal, in the months of April and May<br />
of that year. Hariot, to whom Baron Zach ascribes the discovery<br />
of the sun's spots, (16th of January, 1610), certainly saw<br />
three of them on the 8th of December, 1610, and noted them<br />
down in a register<br />
of observations but he was ;<br />
ignorant that<br />
they were solar spots ; thus, too, Flamstead, on the 23rd of<br />
December, 1690, and Tobias Mayer, on the 25th of Septem-<br />
ber, 1756, did not recognise Uranus as a planet when it<br />
passed across the field of their telescope. Hariot first observed<br />
the solar spots on the 1st of December, 1611, five months,<br />
therefore, after Fabricius had published his discovery.<br />
Galileo<br />
had made the observation that the<br />
"<br />
solar spots, many of<br />
which are larger than the Mediterranean, or even than Africa<br />
and Asia," form a definite zone on the sun's disk. He occasionally<br />
noticed the same spots return, and he was convinced<br />
that they belonged to the sun itself. Their differences of<br />
dimension in the centre of the sun, and, when they disappeared<br />
on the sun's edge, especially attracted his attention,<br />
but still I find nothing in his second remarkable letter of the<br />
14th of August, 1612, to Marcus Welser, that would indicate<br />
his having observed an inequality in the ash-coloured margin<br />
on both sides of the black nucleus when approaching the sun's<br />
edge (Alexander Wilson's accurate observation in 1773). The<br />
Canon Tarde, in 1620, and Malapertus in 1633, ascribed all<br />
obscurations of the sun to small cosmical bodies revolving<br />
around it and intercepting its light, and named the Bourbon<br />
and Austrian stars* (Borbonia et Austriaca Sidera). Fabricius<br />
recognised, like Galileo, that the spots belonged to the<br />
sun itself;f he also noticed that the spots he had seen vanish<br />
all re-appear; and the observation of these phenomena taught<br />
him the rotation of the sun, which had already been conjectured<br />
by Kepler before the discovery of the solar spots. The<br />
most accurate determinations of the period of rotation were,<br />
however, made in 1630, by the diligent Scheiner. Since the<br />
strongest light ever produced by man, Drummond's incan-<br />
* Delambe, Hist, de VAstronomie moderne, t. i. p. 690.<br />
f The same opinion is expressed in Galileo's Letters to Prince Cesi<br />
(May 25, 1612); Venturi, P.i. p. 172.<br />
2 z2