COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

worldlibrary.sg
from worldlibrary.sg More from this publisher
20.06.2013 Views

DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 687 attached to the work of Copernicus, and inscribed De Hyports ; but they are quite contrary to the opinions exjKvss.-.'d by Copernicus, and in direct contradiction with his dedication to Pope Paul III. The author of these prefatory remarks was, as Gassendi most expressly says, in his Life of the great astronomer, a mathematician then living at Nuremberg, and named Andreas Ossiander, who, together with Schoner, superintended the printing of the work De Rerolniioni'oiis, and who, although he makes no express declaration of any religious scruples, appears nevertheless to have thought it expedient to speak of the new views as of an hypothesis, truth. and, not like Copernicus, as of demonstrated The founder of our present system of the universe (for to him incontestibly belong the most important parts of it, and the grandest features of the design) was almost more and confidence distinguished, if possible, by the intrepidity with which he expressed his opinions, than for the knowledge to which they owed their origin. He deserves to a high degree the fine eulogium passed upon him by Kepler, who, in the introduction to the Rudolphine Tables, says of him, " Vir fuit maxima ingenio et quod in hoc exercitio (combating prejudices) magni momenti est, anww liber" When Copernicus is describing, in his dedication to the Pope, the origin of his work, he does not scruple to term the opinion generally expressed amongst theologians of the immobility and central position of the earth "an absurd acroama," and to attack the stupidity of those who adhere to so erroneous a " doctrine. If even," he writes, " any empty-headed babblers ( learned world the first accurate knowledge of the Copernican system. Bhseticus had resigned his professional chair at Wittenberg, in" order that he might enjoy the instructions of Copernicus at Frauenburg itself. (Compare, on these subjects, Gassendi, pp. 310319.) The explanation of what Osiander was induced to add from timidity, is given by Gassendi: "Andreas porro Osiander fuit, qui non modo operarum inspector (the superintendent of the printing) fuit, sed Prsefatiunculam quoque ad lectorem (tacito licet nomine) de Hypothesibus opens adhibuit, Ejus in ea consilium fuit, ut, tametsi Copernicus Motum Terras habuisset, non solum pro Hypothesi, sed pro vero etiam placito ; ipse tamen ad rem, ob illos, qui nine offenderentur, leniendam, excusatum eum faceret, quasi talem motum non pro dogmate, sed pro Hypothesi mera assumpsisset."^

688 COSMOS. ignorant of all mathematical science, should take upon themselves to pronounce judgment on his work through an inten- tional distortion of any passage in the holy Scriptures (propter aliqucm locum scripturce male ad situm proposition detortum,} he should despise so presumptuous an attack. It was, indeed, universally known that the celebrated Lactantius, who however could not be reckoned among mathematicians, had spoken childishly (pueriliter) of the form of the earth, deriding those who held it to be spherical. On mathematical subjects one should write only to mathematicians. In order to show that, deeply penetrated with the truth of his own deductions, he had no cause to fear the judgment that might be passed upon him, he turned his prayers from a remote corner of the earth to the head of the Church, begging that he would protect him from the assaults of calumny, since the Church itself would derive advantage from his investigations on the length of the year, and the movements of the moon." Astrology and improvements in the calendar long procured protection for astronomy from the secular and ecclesiastical powers, as chemistry and botany were long esteemed as purely subservient auxiliaries to the science of medicine. The strong and free expressions employed by Copernicus sufficiently refute the old opinion, that he advanced the system wrhich bears his immortal name as an hypothesis convenient for making astronomical calculations, and one which might be devoid of foundation. " By 110 other arrangement," he exclaims with enthusiasm, " have I been able to find so admirable a symmetry of the universe, and so harmonious a connection of orbits, as by placing the lamp of the world, (lucernam mundi,} the sun, in the midst of the beautiful temple of nature as on a kingly throne, ruling the whole family of circling stars that revolve around him (circumagentem gubernam astrorum familiam.y* Even the idea of universal gravitation or * Quis enim in hoc pulcherrimo templo lampadem hanc in alio vel meliori loco poneret, quam unde totum simul possit illuminare? Si- quidem non inepte quidam lucernam mundi, alii mentem, alii rectorem vocant. Trismegistus visibilem Deum, Soplioclis Electra intuentem omnia. Ita profecto tanquam in solio regali Sol residens circuma- gentem gubernat Astrorum familiam : Tellus quoque minime fraudatur lunari ministerio, sed ut .Aristoteles de animalibus ait, maximam Luna cum terra cognationem habet. Concepit interea a Sole terra, et impregnatur annuo partu. Invenimus igitur sub hac ordinatione admi-

DISCOVERIES IN THE CELESTIAL SPACES. 687<br />

attached to the work of Copernicus, and inscribed De Hyports<br />

; but they are quite contrary to the<br />

opinions exjKvss.-.'d by Copernicus, and in direct contradiction<br />

with his dedication to Pope Paul <strong>II</strong>I. The author of these<br />

prefatory remarks was, as Gassendi most expressly says, in<br />

his Life of the great astronomer, a mathematician then living<br />

at Nuremberg, and named Andreas Ossiander, who, together<br />

with Schoner, superintended the printing of the work De<br />

Rerolniioni'oiis, and who, although he makes no express declaration<br />

of any religious scruples, appears nevertheless to have<br />

thought it expedient to speak of the new views as of an<br />

hypothesis,<br />

truth.<br />

and, not like Copernicus, as of demonstrated<br />

The founder of our present system of the universe (for<br />

to him incontestibly belong the most important parts of it,<br />

and the grandest features of the design) was almost more<br />

and confidence<br />

distinguished, if possible, by the intrepidity<br />

with which he expressed his opinions, than for the knowledge<br />

to which they owed their origin. He deserves to a high<br />

degree the fine eulogium passed upon him by Kepler, who, in<br />

the introduction to the Rudolphine Tables, says of him,<br />

"<br />

Vir fuit maxima ingenio et quod in hoc exercitio (combating<br />

prejudices) magni momenti est, anww liber" When Copernicus<br />

is describing, in his dedication to the Pope, the origin<br />

of his work, he does not scruple to term the opinion generally<br />

expressed amongst theologians of the immobility and central<br />

position of the earth "an absurd acroama," and to attack the<br />

stupidity of those who adhere to so erroneous a<br />

"<br />

doctrine. If<br />

even," he writes, " any empty-headed babblers (<br />

learned world the first accurate knowledge of the Copernican system.<br />

Bhseticus had resigned his professional chair at Wittenberg, in" order<br />

that he might enjoy the instructions of Copernicus at Frauenburg itself.<br />

(Compare, on these subjects, Gassendi, pp. 310319.) The explanation<br />

of what Osiander was induced to add from timidity, is given by<br />

Gassendi: "Andreas porro Osiander fuit, qui non modo operarum<br />

inspector (the superintendent of the printing) fuit, sed Prsefatiunculam<br />

quoque ad lectorem (tacito licet nomine) de Hypothesibus opens<br />

adhibuit, Ejus in ea consilium fuit, ut, tametsi Copernicus Motum<br />

Terras habuisset, non solum pro Hypothesi, sed pro vero etiam placito ;<br />

ipse tamen ad rem, ob illos, qui nine offenderentur, leniendam, excusatum<br />

eum faceret, quasi talem motum non pro dogmate, sed pro<br />

Hypothesi mera assumpsisset."^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!