COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

worldlibrary.sg
from worldlibrary.sg More from this publisher
20.06.2013 Views

OCEANIC DISCOVERIES. 619 Questi, clie m'b a dcstra piu vicino, ed esso Alberto Frate e maestro fummi ; E' di Cologna, ed io Thomas d'Aquino. 11 Paradiso, x. 97-99. In all that has directly operated on the extension of the natural sciences, and on their establishment on a mathematical basis, and by the calling forth of phenomena by the process of experiment, Roger Bacon, the contemporary of Albertus of Bollstadt, may be regarded as the most important and influential man of the middle ages. These two men occupy almost the whole of the thirteenth century; but to Roger Bacon belongs the merit that the influence which he exercised on the form of the mode of treating the study of nature, has been more beneficial and lasting than the various discoveries which, with more or less justice, have been ascribed to him. Stimulating the mind to independence of thought, he severely condemned the blind faith attached to the authority of the schools, yet, far from neglecting the investigations of the ancient Greeks, he directed his attention simultaneously to philological researches,* and the application of mathematics and of the Scientia experimentalis, to which last he devoted a special section of the Opus maj-us.] Protected and favoured by one Pope (Clement IV.), and accused of magic and im- prisoned by two others (Nicholas III. and IV.), he experienced the changes of fortune common to great minds in all ages. He was acquainted with the Optics of Ptoleniy,^ and with * So many passages of the Opus majus show the respect which Roger Bacon entertained for Grecian antiquity, that, as Jourclain has already remarked (p. 429), we can only interpret the wish expressed by him in a letter to Pope Clement IV., " to burn the works of Aristotle, in order to stop the diffusion of error among the scholars," as referring to the bad Latin translations from the Arabic. f Scientia experimentalis a vulgo studentium penitus ignorata; duo tamen sunt modi cognosccndi, scilicet per argumentum et experientiam (the ideal path, and the path of experiment). Sine experientia nihil sufficienter sciri potest. Argumentum concludit, sed non certificat, neque removet duditationem; et quiescat animus in intuita veritatis, nisi earn inveniat via experientise." (Opus majus, pars. vi. cap. 1.) I have collected all the passages relating to Roger Bacon's physical know ledge, and to his proposals for various inventions, in the Examen crit. de VHist. de la Geoyr., t. ii. pp. 295-299. Compare also Whewell, Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, vol. ii. pp. 323-337. % See vol. ii. p. 562. I find Ptolemy's Optics cited in the Opus

620 COSMOS. tlie Almagest. As lie, like the Arabs, always calls Ilip- parchus, Abraxis, we may conclude that he also made use of only a Latin translation from the Arabic. Next to Bacon's chemical experiments on combustible explosive mixtures, his theoretical optical works on perspective, and the position of the focus in concave mirrors, are the most important. His profound Opus majiis contains proposals and schemes of practicable execution, but no clear traces of successful optical discoveries. Profoundness of mathematical knovvledge cannot be ascribed to him. That which characterizes him is rather a certain liveliness of fancy, which, owing to the impression excited by so many unexplained great natural phenomena, and the long and anxious search for the solution of mysterious problems, was often excited to a degree of morbid excess in those monks of the middle ages who devoted themselves to the study of natural philosophy. Before the invention of printing, the expense of copyists, rendered it difficult, in the middle ages, to collect any large number of separate manuscripts, and thus tended to produce a great predilection for encyclopedic works after the extension of ideas in the thirteenth century. These merit special consider- ation, because they led to a generalisation of ideas. There appeared the twenty books de rerumnatura of Thomas Cantipratensis, Professor at Louvain (1230); The Mirror of Nature (speculum naturale), written by Vincenzius of Beauvais (Bellovacensis) for St. Louis and his consort Margaret of Provence (1250); The Book of Nature, by Conrad von Meygenberg, a and the Picture of the World (Imago- priest at llatisbon ( 1349) ; mundi) of Cardinal Petrus de Alliaco, Bishop of Cambray (1410), majus (ed. Jcbb, Lond. 1733), pp. 79, 288, and 404. It has been justly denied (Wilde, Geschichte der Optik, th. i. s. 92-96) that the knowledge derived from Alhazen, of the magnifying power of segments of spheres, was actually the means of leading Bacon to construct spectacles. This invention would appear to have been known as early as 1299, or to belong to the Florentine, Sidvino degli Armati, who Avas buried, in 1317, in the Church of Santa Maria Maggiore at Florence. If Roger Bacon, who completed Ms Opus majus in 1267, speaks of instruments by means of " which small letters appear large, utilcs senibns habentibus oculos debiles," his words prove, as do also the practically erroneous considerations which he subjoins, that he cannot himself have executed that which obscurely floated before his mind as possible.

OCEANIC DISCOVERIES. 619<br />

Questi, clie m'b a dcstra piu vicino,<br />

ed esso Alberto<br />

Frate e maestro fummi ;<br />

E' di Cologna, ed io Thomas d'Aquino.<br />

11 Paradiso,<br />

x. 97-99.<br />

In all that has directly operated on the extension of the<br />

natural sciences, and on their establishment on a mathematical<br />

basis, and by the calling forth of phenomena by the process<br />

of experiment, Roger Bacon, the contemporary of Albertus<br />

of Bollstadt, may be regarded as the most important and<br />

influential man of the middle ages. These two men occupy<br />

almost the whole of the thirteenth century; but to Roger<br />

Bacon belongs the merit that the influence which he exercised<br />

on the form of the mode of treating the study of nature, has<br />

been more beneficial and lasting than the various discoveries<br />

which, with more or less justice, have been ascribed to him.<br />

Stimulating the mind to independence of thought, he severely<br />

condemned the blind faith attached to the authority of the<br />

schools, yet, far from neglecting the investigations of the<br />

ancient Greeks, he directed his attention simultaneously to<br />

philological researches,* and the application of mathematics<br />

and of the Scientia experimentalis, to which last he devoted a<br />

special section of the Opus maj-us.] Protected and favoured<br />

by one Pope (Clement IV.), and accused of magic and im-<br />

prisoned by two others (Nicholas <strong>II</strong>I. and IV.), he experienced<br />

the changes of fortune common to great minds in all ages.<br />

He was acquainted with the Optics of Ptoleniy,^ and with<br />

* So many passages of the Opus majus show the respect which Roger<br />

Bacon entertained for Grecian antiquity, that, as Jourclain has already<br />

remarked (p. 429), we can only interpret the wish expressed by him in<br />

a letter to Pope Clement IV., " to burn the works of Aristotle, in order<br />

to stop the diffusion of error among the scholars," as referring to the bad<br />

Latin translations from the Arabic.<br />

f Scientia experimentalis a vulgo studentium penitus ignorata; duo<br />

tamen sunt modi cognosccndi, scilicet per argumentum et experientiam<br />

(the ideal path, and the path of experiment). Sine experientia<br />

nihil sufficienter sciri potest. Argumentum concludit, sed non certificat,<br />

neque removet duditationem; et quiescat animus in intuita veritatis,<br />

nisi earn inveniat via experientise." (Opus majus, pars. vi. cap. 1.) I<br />

have collected all the passages relating to Roger Bacon's physical know<br />

ledge, and to his proposals for various inventions, in the Examen crit.<br />

de VHist. de la Geoyr., t. ii. pp. 295-299. Compare also Whewell,<br />

Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, vol. ii. pp. 323-337.<br />

% See vol. ii. p. 562. I find Ptolemy's Optics cited in the Opus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!