COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library COSMOS, VOL. II - World eBook Library

worldlibrary.sg
from worldlibrary.sg More from this publisher
20.06.2013 Views

PHYSICAL CONTEMPLATION OF THE UNIVERSE. 47tf the gradual development of the science of the Cosmos are, into the therefore, of very different kinds; viz., investigations structure of languages; the deciphering of ancient inscriptions and historical monuments in hieroglyphics and arrow- headed writing; the greater perfection of mathematics,, especially of that powerful analytic calculus by which the form of the earth, the ebb and flow of the sea, and the regions of space are brought within the compass of calculation. To> these aids must be further added the material inventions which have procured for us, as it were, new organs, sharpened the power of our senses, and enabled men to enter into a closer communication with terrestrial forces, and even with the remote regions of space. In order to enumerate only a few of the instruments, whose invention characterises great epochs in the history of civilisation, I would name the telescope,, and its too long delayed connection with instruments of measurement ; the compound microscope, which furnishes us with the means of tracing the conditions of the process of development of organisms, which Aristotle gracefully designates as "the formative activity the source of being;" the compass, and the different contrivances invented for measuring terrestrial magnetism the use of the pendulum as a measure of time ; the barometer * r the thermometer ; hygrometric and electrometric apparatuses ; and the polariscope, in its application to the phenomena of coloured polarisation, in the light of the stars, or in luminous regions of the atmosphere. The history of the physical contemplation of the universe,, which is based, as we nave already remarked, on a meditative- consideration of natural phenomena, on the connection of great events, and on inventions which enlarge the domain of sensuous perception, can only be presented in a fragmentary and superficial manner, and only in its leading features. I flatter myself with the hope that the brevity of this mode of treatment will enable the reader the more readily to apprehend the spirit in which a picture should be sketched, whose limits it is so difficult to define. Here, as in the picture of nature which is given in the former part of this work, it will be my object to treat the subject not with the completeness of an individual- ising enumeration, but merely by the development of leading ideas, that indicate some of the paths which must be pursued by the physicist in his historical investigations. The know-

474 COSMOS. ledge of the connection of events and their causal relations is assumed to be possessed by the reader, and it \vill consequently be sufficient merely to indicate these events, and determine the influence which they have exercised on the gradual increase of the knowledge of nature as a whole. Completeness, I must again repeat, is neither to be attained,' nor is it to be regarded as the object of such an undertaking. In the announcement of the mode in which I propose treating my subject, in order to preserve for the present work its peculiar character, I shall, no doubt, expose myself again to the animadversions of those who think less of what a book contains than of that which, according to their individual views, ought to be found in it. I have purposely been much more circumstantial with reference to the more ancient than the modern portions of history. Where the sources of information are less copious the difficulty of a proper combination is increased, and the opinions advanced then require to be supported by the testimony of facts less generally known. I would also observe that I have permitted myself to treat my subject with inequality, where the enumeration of individual facts afforded the advantage of imparting greater interest to the narrative. As the recognition of the unity of the Cosmos began in an intuitive presentiment, and with merely a few actual observa- tions on isolated portions of the domain of nature, it seems incumbent that we should begin our historical representation of the universe, from some definite point of our terrestrial planet. We will select for this purpose that sea basin, around which have dwelt those nations, whose knowledge has formed the basis of our western civilisation, which alone has made an almost uninterrupted progress. We may indicate the main streams from which Western Europe has received the ele ments of the cultivation and extended views of nature, but amid the diversity of these streams we are unable to trace one primitive source. A deep insight into the forces of nature, and a recognition of the unity of the Cosmos does not appertain to a so-called primitive race a term that has beep applied amid the alternations of historical views, sometimes to a Semitic race in Northern Chaldea Arpaxad(the Arrapachitis of Ptolemy)* and sometimes to a race of Indians and Ira- * Ewald, Geschichte des Volkes Israel, bd. i. 1843, s. 332-334; Las-

474 <strong>COSMOS</strong>.<br />

ledge of the connection of events and their causal relations is<br />

assumed to be possessed by the reader, and it \vill consequently<br />

be sufficient merely to indicate these events, and<br />

determine the influence which they have exercised on the<br />

gradual increase of the knowledge of nature as a whole.<br />

Completeness, I must again repeat, is neither to be attained,'<br />

nor is it to be regarded as the object of such an undertaking.<br />

In the announcement of the mode in which I propose treating<br />

my subject, in order to preserve for the present work its<br />

peculiar character, I shall, no doubt, expose myself again to<br />

the animadversions of those who think less of what a book<br />

contains than of that which, according to their individual<br />

views, ought to be found in it. I have purposely<br />

been much<br />

more circumstantial with reference to the more ancient than<br />

the modern portions of history. Where the sources of information<br />

are less copious the difficulty of a proper combination<br />

is increased, and the opinions advanced then require to be<br />

supported by the testimony of facts less generally known. I<br />

would also observe that I have permitted myself to treat my<br />

subject with inequality, where the enumeration of individual<br />

facts afforded the advantage of imparting greater interest to<br />

the narrative.<br />

As the recognition of the unity of the Cosmos began in an<br />

intuitive presentiment, and with merely a few actual observa-<br />

tions on isolated portions of the domain of nature, it seems incumbent<br />

that we should begin our historical representation of<br />

the universe, from some definite point of our terrestrial planet.<br />

We will select for this purpose that sea basin, around which<br />

have dwelt those nations, whose knowledge has formed the<br />

basis of our western civilisation, which alone has made an<br />

almost uninterrupted progress. We may indicate the main<br />

streams from which Western Europe has received the ele<br />

ments of the cultivation and extended views of nature,<br />

but amid the diversity of these streams we are unable to<br />

trace one primitive source. A deep insight into the forces of<br />

nature, and a recognition of the unity of the Cosmos does not<br />

appertain to a so-called primitive race a term that has beep<br />

applied amid the alternations of historical views, sometimes to<br />

a Semitic race in Northern Chaldea Arpaxad(the Arrapachitis<br />

of<br />

Ptolemy)* and sometimes to a race of Indians and Ira-<br />

* Ewald, Geschichte des Volkes Israel, bd. i. 1843, s. 332-334; Las-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!