19.06.2013 Views

Download PDF version of article - UCL

Download PDF version of article - UCL

Download PDF version of article - UCL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264 KAREN RADNER<br />

Shalmaneser III <strong>of</strong> Assyria (858-824 BC) deemed a visit to worship at the ‘Tigris source’ so important that he<br />

had his army take a detour on its march back from inner Anatolia to Assyria in 852 BC; he and his predecessor<br />

Tiglath-pileser I (1114-1076 BC) are known to have sacrificed at the ‘Tigris source’ and both had inscriptions<br />

and images fashioned at the site. 175 Furthermore his visit was illustrated in an exceptional double register<br />

depiction on the Balawat Gates (Fig. 17.09).<br />

Fig. 17.09. The Tigris Grotto depicted on Band X <strong>of</strong> the Balawat Gates <strong>of</strong> Shalmaneser III.<br />

Drawn by Cornelie Wolff.<br />

Assyrian practice and the fact that the Tigris was considered a major deity in the Hurrian world lead us<br />

to conclude that the ‘Tigris source’ was as famous and important a sanctuary as the temples <strong>of</strong> Haldi at Musasir<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the storm god at Kumme. It may be significant, then, that Esarhaddon composed a Letter to Assur,<br />

detailing the invasion <strong>of</strong> Subria, just as Sargon had done after the capture <strong>of</strong> Musasir and the looting <strong>of</strong> Haldi’s<br />

temple, the only other well-known example <strong>of</strong> this text genre. Esarhaddon’s text is broken where we expect<br />

the account <strong>of</strong> the invasion <strong>of</strong> Subria, but the spoils taken from that country are later given to the gods <strong>of</strong><br />

Assyria, and at least part <strong>of</strong> these riches must have originated from Subrian sanctuaries.<br />

Is it coincidence that both the sack <strong>of</strong> Musasir and the invasion <strong>of</strong> Subria are reported to Assyria’s divine<br />

overlord in a Letter to Assur, or is this the direct result <strong>of</strong> the underlying similarities between the cases – an<br />

existing alliance with Assyria, secured by a treaty, broken; a sanctuary sacred to and frequented by the Assyrians<br />

violated – that may have required the composition <strong>of</strong> such an account which one might then interpret<br />

as a defence statement forwarded to the divine court <strong>of</strong> law which decided the fate <strong>of</strong> all according to the<br />

Mesopotamian world view? How we see this matter influences how we judge the significance <strong>of</strong> Sargon’s and<br />

Esarhaddon’s actions in Musasir and Subria – and the importance <strong>of</strong> the ancient Hurrian cult centres in the<br />

wider world.<br />

175 For the Assyrian reliefs and inscriptions from the ‘Tigris source’ see the contributions <strong>of</strong> Radner and Schachner in Schachner (Hrsg.)<br />

2009.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!