APMP.M.H-S3 Final Report Comparison on Hardness ... - BIPM
APMP.M.H-S3 Final Report Comparison on Hardness ... - BIPM
APMP.M.H-S3 Final Report Comparison on Hardness ... - BIPM
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Revisi<strong>on</strong>: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Final</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Date: May 25, 2012<br />
Abstract<br />
The <str<strong>on</strong>g>APMP</str<strong>on</strong>g>.M.H-<str<strong>on</strong>g>S3</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rockwell hardness intercomparis<strong>on</strong> was initiated by NIMT,<br />
Thailand and the required protocol was prepared by NIMT and was checked by Dr.John<br />
Man, MNIA, Australia in 2009. In this comparis<strong>on</strong>, PTB, Germany, Standards and<br />
Calibrati<strong>on</strong> Laboratory (SCL), H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, Nati<strong>on</strong>al Physical Laboratory (NPLI), India,<br />
and Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Korea have<br />
participated. This comparis<strong>on</strong> exercise was focused in the measurement range of 25-100<br />
HRBW scale and 35-85 HRA scale. The Round Robin test was d<strong>on</strong>e during the period<br />
of April 2010 to October 2010. The participated NMIs have dem<strong>on</strong>strated the capability<br />
of the machine and the operating c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s according to ISO 6508 Part3 to perform the<br />
measurements. However, SCL, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g could dem<strong>on</strong>strate their capability to<br />
perform the measurements <strong>on</strong>ly according to ISO 6508 part2. The CMC declared by the<br />
different laboratories lie in the range of 0.30 HRA to 0.40 HRA and 0.40 HRBW to<br />
0.75 HRBW. The CMC declared by SCL for the Rockwell B scale is 1.5HRBW due to<br />
the reas<strong>on</strong> described above. It is observed from the results that the measurement<br />
uncertainty is estimated not less than the CMC declared by the laboratories. From the<br />
measurement results provided by all the participated laboratories, the En ratio was<br />
determined to establish the degree of equivalence. The En ratio was calculated by<br />
including as well as by excluding the results of the laboratory which has performed the<br />
test according to ISO 6508 Part2 in order to make sure that it does not affect the overall<br />
results. It is noticed that the En ratio still found to remain less than 1.<br />
Page 2 of 77