19.06.2013 Views

[en] Landscape Ecological Survey of the Bipindi-Akom II ... - ITTO

[en] Landscape Ecological Survey of the Bipindi-Akom II ... - ITTO

[en] Landscape Ecological Survey of the Bipindi-Akom II ... - ITTO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.3 Soil physical physical characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nyangong, Nyangong, Ebom and Ebimimbang soils<br />

Soil type type Depth Texture Texture Texture Texture Bulk Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity AWe<br />

(clay%) (silt%) (silt%) (sand%) (g/cm3) (%)<br />

Nyangong I 35-70 10-20 10-40 1.03 10<br />

2 50-80 50-80 5-15 10-40 1.21 12<br />

3 1.26 7<br />

Ebom I 20-50 5-20 40-60 1.22 17<br />

2 35-60 35-60 5-15 30-50 1.37 16<br />

3 1.4 1.4 12<br />

Ebimimbang I 0-25 5-15 60-90 1.3 11<br />

2 20-45 5-15 40-80 1.55 15 15<br />

3 1.63 n.a.<br />

Soil depth classes: I = 0-20cm; 2 = 20-60 cm; 3 = 60-90cm. Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity values are <strong>the</strong> average <strong>of</strong> at least 4<br />

observations. A AWC= WC= Available Water Cont<strong>en</strong>t (one or two observations per soil depth class).<br />

The Valley Bottom soils are dominated by a sandy texture, but in fact all all texture texture classes classes may may<br />

occur in in all possible possible sequ<strong>en</strong>ces. Stratification is characteristic for <strong>the</strong>se soils. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, g<strong>en</strong>eral, <strong>the</strong><br />

Valley Valley Bottom soils have have 5-30% clay and 40-90% sand sand in <strong>the</strong> topsoil. The subsurface horizons<br />

g<strong>en</strong>erally are more sandy.<br />

5.3.2 Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity<br />

The ranges ranges in bulk bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> soils soils in <strong>the</strong> TCP research research area area are 0.8 to lA g/cm3 in in <strong>the</strong><br />

topsoils topsoils (0-10 cm) and 1.0 to 1.7 g/cm g/cm 3 in <strong>the</strong> subsoils (20-90 cm) (Table 5.3). The bulk<br />

d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> all three three main soil soil types increase strongly with depth, depth, as as effects effects <strong>of</strong> cultivation cultivation and and<br />

organic matter matter cont<strong>en</strong>t decrease. decrease. The The increase <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities with depth take place 'within<br />

25 25 cm from from <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface. The The bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nyangong/Ebom soils and <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang<br />

soils are within <strong>the</strong> normal range <strong>of</strong> 1.0 to 1.6 g/cm g/cm3 3 and 1.2 to 1.8 g/cm g/cm 3 as giv<strong>en</strong> by Landon<br />

(1991) for clayey and sandy soils, respectively.<br />

3 as giv<strong>en</strong> by Landon<br />

(1991) for clayey and sandy soils, respectively.<br />

Average values <strong>of</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities for <strong>the</strong> Nyangong, Ebom and Ebimimbang soils at three depths<br />

(0-20 cm, 20-60 cm and 60-90cm) are giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 5.3. The Nyangong topsoils have bulk<br />

d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> around 1.0 g/cm3, and below 20 cm <strong>the</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities increase to values <strong>of</strong> 1.2 to<br />

1.3 g/cm3. The topsoils and subsurface horizons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebom soils have bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities around<br />

1.2 and lA g/cm3 Average values <strong>of</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities for <strong>the</strong> Nyangong, Ebom and Ebimimbang soils at three depths<br />

(0-20 cm, 20-60 cm and 60-90cm) are giv<strong>en</strong> in Table 5.3. The Nyangong topsoils have bulk<br />

d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> around 1.0 g/cm3, and below 20 cm <strong>the</strong> bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities increase to values <strong>of</strong> 1.2 to<br />

1.3 g/cm<br />

, respectively. Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang soils are <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

TCP research area, i.e. 1.3 g/cm 3 for <strong>the</strong> topsoils and 1.5 to 1.7 g/cm 3 for <strong>the</strong> subsoils. There is<br />

thus an increasing bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity with a decreasing clay cont<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

3 • The topsoils and subsurface horizons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebom soils have bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities around<br />

1.2 and 1.4 g/cm3 , respectively. Bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang soils are <strong>the</strong> highest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

TCP research area, i.e. 1.3 g/cm3 for <strong>the</strong> topsoils and 1.5 to 1.7 g/cm3 for <strong>the</strong> subsoils. There is<br />

thus an increasing bulk d<strong>en</strong>sity with a decreasing clay cont<strong>en</strong>t.<br />

The Ebimimbang soils have less stable aggregates than <strong>the</strong> Ebom and Nyangong soils (Waterloo<br />

et al., 1997), resulting in vertical clay movem<strong>en</strong>t and lower permeability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang<br />

soils. The higher bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ebimimbang Ebimimbang soils are explained by <strong>the</strong> lower aggregate<br />

stability and higher sand sand cont<strong>en</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se soils.<br />

Topsoils under agriculture have decreased organic matter cont<strong>en</strong>ts and less roots resulting in<br />

higher bulk d<strong>en</strong>sities d<strong>en</strong>sities compared to id<strong>en</strong>tical soils soils under forest (pers. comm. comm. Yemefack, 1996). 1996).<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!