Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

That Jeremy Jones can speak of a ‘fair trial’ is symptomatic of his numerous
blind spots that flow directly from his Talmudic dialectic. Empathetic
understanding and symthetic analysis are foreign to him. When he cannot
play the dictator, he falls into the victim mode, all to just win the argument.
That is the affliction of one who retains the primitive eye-for-an-eye ethics
of Talmudic–Marxist dialectics rather than the Hegelian win–win dialectic.
Our legal wranglings since 1996 culminating in my imprisonment illustrate
so well how Jones was never prepared to open himself to any kind of
discussion. His aim was to stop us from functioning. Fortunately, with the
Internet he has lost that battle because it is an immoral battle.
In Germany where Holocaust persecution is rampant, the Horst Mahler,
Ernst Zündel, Sylvia Stolz and Germar Rudolf cases of 2005–07 pushed the
absurd development of legal precedent further along the line of reasoning
that would make Jones proud. For the German judiciary a specific crunchtime
in legal logic and procedural standards came when Kevin Käther,
following Dirk Zimmermann’s example of resisting this Holocaust dogma’s
legal force, self-indicted himself. The difference between a public and a
private act has been sharply delineated, but actual evidence at the matters of
fact stage of the proceedings is still not being allowed as part of a defence –
and that is scandalous and worrisome for German judges and prosecutors
and lawyers who value the rule-of-law as a basic civilising principle.
*
The Latest Judicial News from Absurdistan
By the authors of the National Journal
Translated by J M Damon
Like a true patriot, Kevin Käther has been fighting the modern Inquisition
tribunals on behalf of the German nation.
In an appeal hearing on 9th June 2009, Tiergarten District Court (Berlin)
initially sentenced him to a prison sentence of eight months without
probation.
The concerned citizen will ask: What brought about his guilty verdict and
prison sentence?
Kevin’s crime consisted of sending compact discs (CDs) of Germar
Rudolf’s proscribed book ‘Lectures On the Holocaust’ to three judges in
Berlin and then filing an official complaint against himself for violating
Germany’s notorious censorship laws.
His purpose in doing this was to judicially determine, in a court trial,
whether Rudolf’s factual conclusions are scientifically valid.
360