Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

Yes, my mother did not like what I was doing though my father felt I was
honouring the dead by trying to break through the mental Berlin wall called
the Holocaust. But then I had not been a model son to her either, and it all
began when I was thrown out of Victoria’s state education system, much
dominated by Jewish influence.
I am reminded what Australia’s most active Jew, sometimes called the
Foreign Minister of Australian Jewry, had to say about my German
imprisonment 10 years ago. His gloating does not sit well with his attempt at
trying to play the victim to perfection.
For example, when Jones began to complain about Adelaide Institute’s
website contents, he discounted the free expression argument in favour of
playing the victim. He stated in court that someone happened to view the
material, that someone stumbled upon our website and was horrified at its
‘Holocaust denial’ material.
The question Justice Klaus Kern rightly asked himself at that Mannheim 10
November 1999 hearing was pertinent: Was the Internet material to be
taken into consideration when evaluating the action before him? He found
that I had written a letter and sent it to judges and prosecutors, wherein I
question matters Holocaust, and for that I was sentenced to 10 months
prison, but to be released immediately upon posting Kaution of DM5000.
He did not consider material appearing on the Internet, something the
public prosecutor deemed significant.
The push–pull argument – publish and purchase – was effected by Justice
Kern’s decision. This meant that I was not pushing the material into Germany
but that Germans had to pull it down to read from the Internet website.
The 2001 appeal and cross-appeal to the Karlsruhe Constitutional Court
gave effect to what the public prosecutor wished to see happen: German
law was now to extend globally and grip any Internet website that
diseminated so-called ‘Holocaust denial’, which so delighted Australia’s
prime ugly, Jeremy Jones, who in 1999 expressed his thoughts thus:
IN DENIAL
By Jeremy Jones, The Review, May 1999
At the mid-April meeting of the Adelaide City Council, a debate took
place on when and how the name ‘Adelaide’ could be used by
organisations and corporations. This extraordinary discussion was
357